FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Phobos, wherefore art thou

   
Author Topic: Phobos, wherefore art thou
Ewin
Member
Member # 5402

 - posted      Profile for Ewin   Email Ewin         Edit/Delete Post 
Mrrrr. How long do they usually take past the given date, again? I'm sick of checking the webpage every day already.

"No later than October 15th".... *grumble grumble mutter mutter whyIoughta*

Posts: 11 | Registered: Jul 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rivka
Member
Member # 4859

 - posted      Profile for rivka   Email rivka         Edit/Delete Post 
*pat pat*
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Annie
Member
Member # 295

 - posted      Profile for Annie   Email Annie         Edit/Delete Post 
Just for the record, "wherefore" means "why."
Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rivka
Member
Member # 4859

 - posted      Profile for rivka   Email rivka         Edit/Delete Post 
*has a sudden urge to go stand on a balcony in the moonlight*
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ana kata
Member
Member # 5666

 - posted      Profile for ana kata   Email ana kata         Edit/Delete Post 
Annie, I think maybe she was asking why they're afraid to write.
Posts: 968 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dude Love
Member
Member # 2437

 - posted      Profile for Dude Love   Email Dude Love         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm pretty pathetic. I have my brother checking out the phobos site while I'm at work, to see if they've finally updated.

I don't handle uncertainty well.

Oh, and I think that what Ewin meant was wherefore the hell is Phobos and whence are they going to update thier damned site, forsooth the love of all that is Holy?

Posts: 86 | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
eslaine
Member
Member # 5433

 - posted      Profile for eslaine           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Just for the record, "wherefore" means "why."
So, just why is Phobos?

That's what you meant, right? Why Phobos? Why is Diemos?

This was intended to be an existentialist thread, right?

Posts: 2506 | Registered: Jul 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Der Grammatikfuehrer
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Don't make me come in here.

Oh. Too late.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
eslaine
Member
Member # 5433

 - posted      Profile for eslaine           Edit/Delete Post 
Wasn't it intended to be a planetary science thread?
Posts: 2506 | Registered: Jul 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BannaOj
Member
Member # 3206

 - posted      Profile for BannaOj   Email BannaOj         Edit/Delete Post 
So did Shakespeare have it wrong? I thought it was "wherefore art thou, O Romeo"

I thought she already knew who Romeo was.

AJ

Posts: 11265 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
Wherefore means why. Juliet said, "Wherefore art thou Romeo?" meaning "Why are you Romeo?" She was musing about names and why he had been born into the family they were fighting with. They were only separated by their names, not by any real differences.

[ October 21, 2003, 02:37 PM: Message edited by: Jon Boy ]

Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
fugu13
Member
Member # 2859

 - posted      Profile for fugu13   Email fugu13         Edit/Delete Post 
Dang it, Jon Boy both beat me to it and edited his post before I even had a chance to reply. Stupid dialup.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Zalmoxis
Member
Member # 2327

 - posted      Profile for Zalmoxis           Edit/Delete Post 
From the OED:

quote:
1. For what? esp. for what purpose or end? (Often scarcely distinguishable from 2.)
2. For what cause or reason? on what account? why? (Freq. with ellipsis; often coupled with why for emphasis.)

Annie is essentially correct. 'Why?' is perhaps not the best formulation because we tend to think of it in the mechanistic or motive sense.

Why is the sky blue? Why did OJ run?

Whereas 'wherefore' is more the 'why' in the existentialist sense as eslaine points out.

Juliet is not asking where Romeo is:

quote:
ROMEO
He jests at scars that never felt a wound.

JULIET appears above at a window

But, soft! what light through yonder window breaks?
It is the east, and Juliet is the sun.
Arise, fair sun, and kill the envious moon,
Who is already sick and pale with grief,
That thou her maid art far more fair than she:
Be not her maid, since she is envious;
Her vestal livery is but sick and green
And none but fools do wear it; cast it off.
It is my lady, O, it is my love!
O, that she knew she were!
She speaks yet she says nothing: what of that?
Her eye discourses; I will answer it.
I am too bold, 'tis not to me she speaks:
Two of the fairest stars in all the heaven,
Having some business, do entreat her eyes
To twinkle in their spheres till they return.
What if her eyes were there, they in her head?
The brightness of her cheek would shame those stars,
As daylight doth a lamp; her eyes in heaven
Would through the airy region stream so bright
That birds would sing and think it were not night.
See, how she leans her cheek upon her hand!
O, that I were a glove upon that hand,
That I might touch that cheek!

JULIET
Ay me!

ROMEO
She speaks:
O, speak again, bright angel! for thou art
As glorious to this night, being o'er my head
As is a winged messenger of heaven
Unto the white-upturned wondering eyes
Of mortals that fall back to gaze on him
When he bestrides the lazy-pacing clouds
And sails upon the bosom of the air.

JULIET
O Romeo, Romeo! wherefore art thou Romeo?
Deny thy father and refuse thy name;
Or, if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love,
And I'll no longer be a Capulet.

ROMEO
[Aside] Shall I hear more, or shall I speak at this?

JULIET
'Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
What's Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot,
Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What's in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name,
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself.

ROMEO
I take thee at thy word:
Call me but love, and I'll be new baptized;
Henceforth I never will be Romeo.

JULIET
What man art thou that thus bescreen'd in night
So stumblest on my counsel?

She doesn't know that he's there until after her 'wherefore' speech. What she's doing is ruminating on the difficult decision his existence forces her to make -- for what purpose does he exist when he is the son of her family's enemies?

EDIT: Jon Boy beat me, but my post is thoroughly documented. Therefore, I win. [Wink]

[ October 21, 2003, 02:47 PM: Message edited by: Zalmoxis ]

Posts: 3423 | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
[Hail] Zal's throrough documentation
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BannaOj
Member
Member # 3206

 - posted      Profile for BannaOj   Email BannaOj         Edit/Delete Post 
Well I'm not a Shakespeare scholar so all I ever knew was the common quotation that apparently most average people interpret incorrectly. In one of the two formal English classes I ever took, we did Hamlet instead, so I missed that bit.

Now I know!

AJ

Posts: 11265 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Zalmoxis
Member
Member # 2327

 - posted      Profile for Zalmoxis           Edit/Delete Post 
That reminds me, JB. Do you know if there is a section on smilies and graemlins in the new edition of Chicago? I'd hate to think that I'm doing these wrong. [Wink]

Or is it:

I'd hate to think that I'm doing these wrong [Wink] .

Or is it:

I'd hate to think that I'm doing these wrong. [Wink] .

Posts: 3423 | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dkw
Member
Member # 3264

 - posted      Profile for dkw   Email dkw         Edit/Delete Post 
I hate to think what it says about me that I have actually fretted over the issue that zal just raised. [Angst]
Posts: 9866 | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
That's an interesting question, but unfortunately it's not covered in the new edition of Chicago. In my opinion, it depends on whether the emoticon bears a syntactic or semantic relationship to the sentence. If it does, then I think it should be included before the period. If not, then it should go afterward. Of course, if there's another sentence after the emoticon, it may appear to be a part of that following sentence. In that case, you should probably put the emoticon before the period of the previous sentence. But I don't think it would warrant a second period like your second example.
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Zalmoxis
Member
Member # 2327

 - posted      Profile for Zalmoxis           Edit/Delete Post 
" [Angst] ."

So am I quoting dkw or making light of (ironicalizing?) her pain?

Normally quotes are in some sort of context, but smilies don't really need context -- not entirely at least. I mean their meanings can be changed by context, but they also have meaning by themselves.

Posts: 3423 | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
I'm sorry, Zalmoxis. I can't have a meaningful conversation with someone who makes up words like "ironicalizing."
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Zalmoxis
Member
Member # 2327

 - posted      Profile for Zalmoxis           Edit/Delete Post 
That was entirely for your benefit, you know.

Just to make you cringe.

-----
Bonus post: best Shakespearean word that's not a noun --> perforce!

Posts: 3423 | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
That was low. But I'll excuse it this time because of that cool bonus word.
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Annie
Member
Member # 295

 - posted      Profile for Annie   Email Annie         Edit/Delete Post 
I have often wondered about the proper syntaxtual (that's a word!) use of the graemiln. The rules will have to be adapted, I fear, for use of graemlins after colons and withing parentheses. An additional space will have to become standard to avoid confusing the encoding mechanism in which the graemlin is typed.

Hopefully, after years of training, schoolchildren will know that it is proper to :: peek :: into a chatroom, and we will avoid all occurances of : [Razz] eek::ing

[ October 21, 2003, 04:00 PM: Message edited by: Annie ]

Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Zalmoxis
Member
Member # 2327

 - posted      Profile for Zalmoxis           Edit/Delete Post 
Low.

----
Aside for OJ: Don't never not say that us Jatraqueros didn't ever try to edumacate ya real good.

Posts: 3423 | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BannaOj
Member
Member # 3206

 - posted      Profile for BannaOj   Email BannaOj         Edit/Delete Post 
I believe wherefore is in the Bible a couple times too. I'll have to go back and look for those verses now that I am more enlightened.

AJ

Posts: 11265 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
Annie, don't think that you can get away with making up words just because you're my triplet.

My old roommate had one of Low's Where Are Going? t-shirt, and I'd buy one if it weren't for the fact that I've only ever heard one song by Low.

AJ, whenever wherefore is used in the Bible, it either means why or therefore.

[ October 21, 2003, 05:02 PM: Message edited by: Jon Boy ]

Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Zalmoxis
Member
Member # 2327

 - posted      Profile for Zalmoxis           Edit/Delete Post 
I love that they sell pillowcases.
Posts: 3423 | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Destineer
Member
Member # 821

 - posted      Profile for Destineer           Edit/Delete Post 
I just received an email from Sandra Schulberg at Phobos announcing the 2003 contest finalists. She didn't say anything about keeping this secret, so here's the list (note that there are 25 of them):

“A Timely Education”
“All the Rage This Year”
“And Cry the Name of David”
“Big Shot, The”
“Come to Dust”
“Dissident”
“Earl Billings and the Angels of the Lord”
“End of the Beginning, The”
“Forgotten War, The”
“Future Games: 2050”
“Golden Town”
“Incomplete”
“Man Who Moved the Moon, The”
“Man Who Murdered Himself, The”
“Merge”
“Noah’s Children”
“Second Chance of Clevon Walker, The”
“Sounds of a Future”
“Travelogue”
“Tried as an Adult”
“Truth Will Not Save You,The ”
“Two Rooms and all the Electricity…”
“Veil Of Ignorance”
“Walls Within, The”
“Waterfall”

Hope some of these were from Hatrack people, I can't tell by the titles. [Smile]

Posts: 4600 | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
docmagik
Member
Member # 1131

 - posted      Profile for docmagik   Email docmagik         Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks a lot. I'm glad to know.

:: mutters and swears under his breath ::

:: kicks violenty at some unseen object on ground, misses, falls on butt, gets up and rubs butt, embarressed, hopes nobody saw ::

:: walks away ::

Posts: 1894 | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tristan
Member
Member # 1670

 - posted      Profile for Tristan   Email Tristan         Edit/Delete Post 
So, is anyone of those yours, Destineer?
Posts: 896 | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tristan
Member
Member # 1670

 - posted      Profile for Tristan   Email Tristan         Edit/Delete Post 
Come on, people, no-one who recognise their title? Since I couldn't submit a story of my own, I'm living vicariously here and this lack of responsiveness is frustrating.

[ November 12, 2003, 03:41 PM: Message edited by: Tristan ]

Posts: 896 | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Destineer
Member
Member # 821

 - posted      Profile for Destineer           Edit/Delete Post 
No, I didn't submit to Phobos this year. I'm trying out some other markets before submitting to them again.
Posts: 4600 | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
docmagik
Member
Member # 1131

 - posted      Profile for docmagik   Email docmagik         Edit/Delete Post 
So they're emailing random non-participants the names of the finalists, but not any of the actual people who submitted entries?

Or are you somehow not a random non particpant? [Wink]

Posts: 1894 | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
EricJamesStone
Member
Member # 5938

 - posted      Profile for EricJamesStone           Edit/Delete Post 
I haven't participated on this forum, but I've been active over in the Writers Workshops forum.

One of those titles is mine. Two belong to someone else active in the writers' forum.

So at least three of the finalists were written by Hatrack writers.

Posts: 99 | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ae
Member
Member # 3291

 - posted      Profile for ae   Email ae         Edit/Delete Post 
Congratulations and best of luck to all.
Posts: 2443 | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Destineer
Member
Member # 821

 - posted      Profile for Destineer           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
So they're emailing random non-participants the names of the finalists, but not any of the actual people who submitted entries?

Or are you somehow not a random non particpant?

Sorry, I didn't notice this before. I'm a former winner (last year).

quote:
I haven't participated on this forum, but I've been active over in the Writers Workshops forum.

One of those titles is mine. Two belong to someone else active in the writers' forum.

So at least three of the finalists were written by Hatrack writers.

That's great! Better than other years, I guess -- last year we had two (myself and Scott R) and the year before I think AndrewR was the only one (he ended up winning).

[ November 21, 2003, 05:33 PM: Message edited by: Destineer ]

Posts: 4600 | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tristan
Member
Member # 1670

 - posted      Profile for Tristan   Email Tristan         Edit/Delete Post 
And now the list is up on the official site too.
Posts: 896 | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2