posted
It appears that folks are expecting Pres. Bush to announce a new effort to get the US back to the Moon. Some sites have announced that he is expected to make the announcement on the 100th anniversary of the Wright Brothers' First Flight, which is two days shy of the 30th anniversary of our last lunar landing.
There's still a lot of speculation involved, including the possibility of planning a manned base on the moon. Who knows what will happen, though. I'm thinking that Bush took note of the Chinese announcement that they were aiming to have a Chinese lunar landing by 2020.
posted
I am all for returning to the moon, and going beyond.
However, this seems like such an Un-Republican thing to do.
Massive budget deficit, calls for more tax cuts and smaller government, etc. What could make the Republican officials to back such a massive addition to our already overtaxed bank account?
A drop in the Presidential polls?
The Democrats were labeled, "Tax & Spend liberals" by Bush Republicans.
See, that is what the Democrats did wrong. They made an effort to appear to pay the bills.
The Bush Republicans are being labeled as Spend & Spend Republicans.
or perhaps, "Borrow & Spend, we'll be dead when the bill arrives anyway."
or worse, "Go bankrupt with unneeded spending as an excuse to cut frivolous entitlement programs like foodstamps, Republicans."
or most likely, "Pimp our principles to get relelected Republicans."
The Real Republicans won't stand for it much longer.
Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Unrepublican? This is one of the sad fallacies of my party is that it often spends just as much as the Democrats do. In fact during the Bush administration goverment has expanded greatly. Homeland Security did not only add agenices together it added new positions. Not to mention now a $400 Billion dollar Drug plan for medicare. Also during the 80's the Democrats and Regan had a "sweet" deal going. He would let them spend massive amounts of money if they would give him the tax cuts he wanted.
In any case Republicans have very often been supporters of such projects. Few know that Nixson signed the endangered species act. He also added massive funding for goverment research. Bush also just recently signed a 1.3 billon (over 5 years) bill to support nano technology. All good things in my mind.
I tend to be a GOP who wants to tighten the belt on many things But I think research, transportation, judical, and education should be funded better than they are currently.
Posts: 134 | Registered: Jun 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
There's no awe in going to the moon -- we did it half a century ago. If Bush declares a new trip, it'll be as a publicity stunt on the coattails of JFK, nothing awe-inspiring.
What might catch my attention is a base on Mars, but fat chance...
Posts: 3293 | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged |
quote: which is two days shy of the 30th anniversary of our last lunar landing.
From CNN:
quote: One thing is for certain. For at least another 15 years or so, astronaut Eugene Cernan's bootprint from December 1972 will remain the last legacy of man on the moon.
Did Bush make this announcment last year?
Posts: 2506 | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I am not too worried, or excited, about us going to the Moon. Its not going to happen. Why do I say that? Gut reaction I guess, but regardless of announcing the possibility, I haven't heard any fanfair either by Politicians or the Press. Most of the talk has come from Sci-Fi readers and space travel enthusiasts. The idea is stradling the fence of rumination and rumor.
Considering the lack of reasons to go back -- there isn't anything there to make it productive -- I would be against going without a clear purpose beyond "because why not." I say we work harder on getting people to Mars.
Posts: 2207 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm not really sure what gains in basic science are to be made by going to the moon itself. But maybe Bush got that email about owning acreage on the moon. Maybe McDonald's is paying for the venture provided they get to label the moon.
I guess if they are looking at setting up a shuttle base on the moon, that could generate a lot of research. I do think that China shouldn't be up there alone.
Posts: 11017 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Taunt]](graemlins/taunt.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
