FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » A long time coming.

   
Author Topic: A long time coming.
kmbboots
Member
Member # 8576

 - posted      Profile for kmbboots   Email kmbboots         Edit/Delete Post 
Widgery Report overturned. Victims exonerated.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/northern_ireland/10320609.stm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jun/15/bloody-sunday-report-saville-inquiry

Posts: 11187 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lisa
Member
Member # 8384

 - posted      Profile for Lisa   Email Lisa         Edit/Delete Post 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXnO_FxmHes
Posts: 12266 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Luet13
Member
Member # 9274

 - posted      Profile for Luet13   Email Luet13         Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for posting this. I am happy to see that the Brits finally admitted what happened that day.
Posts: 511 | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kmbboots
Member
Member # 8576

 - posted      Profile for kmbboots   Email kmbboots         Edit/Delete Post 
If you are interested in reading the report it is posted here: http://report.bloody-sunday-inquiry.org/

Interesting reading. Colonel Wilford (rightly from what I can tell) gets a hefty share of blame. Major General Ford gets a bit of a pass though he was responsible for sending the paras in the first place. (Angry potentially violent civilians, aggressive angry paras with guns who see the civilians as vermin - what could go wrong?) I found this bit to be particularly damning (bolding mine).

quote:
We have concluded that the explanation for such firing by Support Company soldiers after they had gone into the Bogside was in most cases probably the mistaken belief among them that republican paramilitaries were responding in force to their arrival in the Bogside. This belief was initiated by the first shots fired by Lieutenant N and reinforced by the further shots that followed soon after. In this belief soldiers reacted by losing their self-control and firing themselves, forgetting or ignoring their instructions and training and failing to satisfy themselves that they had identified targets posing a threat of causing death or serious injury. In the case of those soldiers who fired in either the knowledge or belief that no-one in the areas into which they fired was posing a threat of causing death or serious injury, or not caring whether or not anyone there was posing such a threat, it is at least possible that they did so in the indefensible belief that all the civilians they fired at were probably either members of the Provisional or Official IRA or were supporters of one or other of these paramilitary organisations; and so deserved to be shot notwithstanding that they were not armed or posing any threat of causing death or serious injury. Our overall conclusion is that there was a serious and widespread loss of fire discipline among the soldiers of Support Company.
The important thing that I think the families are taking away from this is that, without exception, the victims have finally been cleared from the smears of the Widgery Tribunal.
Posts: 11187 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2