posted
Mossad's at it again. Or maybe the CIA this time. I think it has to be related to Stuxnet though.
Posts: 1158 | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I highly doubt that the US was behind Stuxnet, but I can believe that they may have played a role (albeit a very minor one), in this strike. The way the mainstream media has kept mum about this leads me to believe something is up. Apparently this happened a couple weeks ago, and I haven't heard anything on it until now. Interesting times we live in, wouldn't you say?
Posts: 1158 | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
While the subject is still totally interesting, I want everyone to remember that this is an article by Debka, which wantonly sensationalizes and won't even bother to differentiate fact from rumor.
quote:In the same way, the regime went to great lengths to cover up the ravages wrought to their nuclear and military control systems by the Stuxnet virus - which is still at work.
quote:Originally posted by fugu13: BlackBlade: did you mean "in tandem"?
Yes, and I had to read my statement twice more before the tandem illusion disappeared revealing tangent. Thanks.
Posts: 14316 | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I wonder how much, if any of what was reported, was misinformation. Was it really "hand-rigged" bombs, or a bunker buster?
Posts: 21898 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
A bunker buster (presumably dropped from an over-flying bomber) would certainly have sparked more public outrage than a hand-rigged bomb designed to look like an accident.
Posts: 692 | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged |
Some more sources. All these really confirm however, is that a fire took place at the base and that quite a few soldiers died as a result. I don't doubt that this wasn't a coordinated strike however. It's just that whoever's behind it is doing a great job of covering it up.
Posts: 1158 | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
