WMDs? found, forgotten, should I check underneath my bed tonight?
flish
Posted by filetted (Member # 5048) on :
G "dub" was a zero, prior to birth.
Posted by Ryan Hart (Member # 5513) on :
I still trust our president. Why would we still send inspectors to Iraq if there wasn't a good idea that there were weapons of mass destruction there? I think that Hussein hid them well before he left power. Remember weapons of mass destruction were only a part of the reason for going to Iraq. There was also the issue of terrorist training camps (which we found), freeing an opressed people (the Kurds), and removing a dangerous man and his two demented sons. I think those are still good reasons to go to Iraq.
Posted by Ralphie (Member # 1565) on :
Sometimes I think flish posts after watching a ten-hour marathon of The Joy of Painting.
::insert hypnotized smilie::
Posted by eslaine (Member # 5433) on :
I believe that smile should be applied with a palette knife instead. Posted by filetted (Member # 5048) on :
*chuckles. good' un*
Posted by ClaudiaTherese (Member # 923) on :
(Ralphie, I'm now snorting whole tortilla chips out me nose. But I would've suspected Ryan, not flish.)
Posted by filetted (Member # 5048) on :
no, seriously.
Is there a war on? Are we in it?
Posted by eslaine (Member # 5433) on :
I thought it was a police action. Like Vietnam...
Posted by filetted (Member # 5048) on :
Really?!
Posted by eslaine (Member # 5433) on :
I do mean Libya.
Posted by filetted (Member # 5048) on :
we're at war with Libya?!
Posted by eslaine (Member # 5433) on :
No, we're just sending troops. I don't know where it stands, I haven't read a newspaper since Wednesday... Sorry.
Posted by filetted (Member # 5048) on :
Me neither.
who else are we at war with?
Posted by eslaine (Member # 5433) on :
This link might help: DICK! Posted by filetted (Member # 5048) on :
Iraq, yeah, and who else?
I'm not so sure I'm comfortable with being at war with everyone. It doesn't sound like a good place to position the nation.
flish
Posted by eslaine (Member # 5433) on :
No arguments here. Bottom line: our bottom line is negative again.
Posted by filetted (Member # 5048) on :
No doubt.
The war didn't help.
flish
Posted by jenny (Member # 5551) on :
There hasn't been much news on the war on terrorism lately, it seems more focused on the California recall and the Kobe Bryant case.
Posted by filetted (Member # 5048) on :
well said, jenny.
Posted by jenny (Member # 5551) on :
Thank you Posted by filetted (Member # 5048) on :
I don't know who we're at war with, though, and this is unsettling.
Posted by jenny (Member # 5551) on :
Since many troops are returning from Iraq, perhaps the government believes that the war there has settled somewhat. Also, I think the government has captured an Al Queda official. Bush also stated that we are winning the war on terrorism, but I'm not sure what he's basing that on.
Posted by Audeo (Member # 5130) on :
I heard that we trained (or are training) 50 Iraqis for the new Iraqi militia to replace the thousands of troops currently being supplied by various countries, especially Canada, UK, and USA. The Liberians are asking us to come help save them and we haven't really answered them yet, while we have Peace Talks with North (or is it South?) Korea with China and the other side South (or possibly North) Korea and Russia adding their two cents. Oh, yeah and I guess there was a power outage somewhere that made the Canadians mad at us or something; nothin to worry about. That's the overall rumors of the United States current Foreign Affairs policy, but it's liable to change suddenly and without warning...usually for the worse. Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
When Libya is mentioned above, do the people mean Liberia? Or are the Americans sending people to both L-Countries.
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Monkeys]](graemlins/monkeys.gif)