FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Justice Department Does the "Right" thing, sort of...too late...but still...

   
Author Topic: Justice Department Does the "Right" thing, sort of...too late...but still...
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:

U.S. to Seek Dismissal Of Terrorism Convictions

By Allan Lengel and Susan Schmidt
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, September 1, 2004; Page A02

The Justice Department will ask a federal judge in Detroit to dismiss the convictions of three men in a high-profile terrorism case last year, saying it has uncovered serious prosecutorial misconduct in the case.

Department lawyers have told U.S. District Judge Gerald Rosen and defense attorneys that the convictions should be thrown out because prosecutors failed to share potentially exculpatory evidence with the defense during last year's trial, legal sources said last night.

The convictions of two Moroccan immigrants for conspiracy to provide material support for terrorism and of a third man on document fraud charges represented one of the government's most significant victories in the war on terrorism in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The move to vacate the convictions comes in the midst of the Republican National Convention, where President Bush is highlighting his success in the war on terrorism as the centerpiece of his reelection campaign.

Rosen and the Justice Department have been investigating allegations that two assistant U.S. attorneys withheld information from the defense. The department is continuing an investigation of one of the prosecutors, Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Convertino, who has responded by suing the government. He alleges that Justice undermined the prosecution and sought to make him the scapegoat.

William Sullivan, Convertino's attorney, declined to comment yesterday, citing a gag order in the case. Other lawyers in the case also cited the order.

A filing from the Justice Department is expected as early as today seeking to have the convictions overturned and detailing the alleged misconduct. The department is expected to say that it will not seek reinstatement of the terrorism-related charges against defendants Karim Koubriti and Abdel-Ilah Elmardoudi but will seek to retry them and a third man, Ahmed Hannan, on document fraud charges.

Details of the government's request to vacate the convictions were first reported on U.S. News & World Report's Web site last night.

In the first terrorism-related trial since the Sept. 11 attacks, Elmardoudi, 37, of Minneapolis, and Koubriti, 26, of Detroit, were convicted in June 2003 of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists and document fraud. Hannan, 35, of Detroit was convicted of document fraud, and Farouk Ali-Haimoud, 22, of Detroit was cleared of all charges.

Justice Department officials, including Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, asserted the men were in a sleeper cell associated with al Qaeda and had plans to secure weapons and attack targets in the United States and abroad.

Authorities stumbled on some of the men when they raided a Detroit apartment shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks in a search for Nabil al-Marabh, who was on a terrorist watch list. They later termed the apprehension one of the most significant in the United States in the war against terrorism.

Throughout the trial, defense attorneys accused the prosecution of withholding key information and witnesses. Convertino admitted that prosecutors should have turned over information earlier but said it was not relevant. Rosen chastised Convertino in open court and said that was not his decision.

Rosen ordered a full review of the information available to the government. Last September, then-Detroit U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Collins removed Convertino and another assistant U.S. attorney, Keith Corbett, from the case, asking the Justice Department to investigate their handling of it.

Rosen also issued a rare rebuke of Ashcroft for exhibiting "a distressing lack of care" in public statements about the case.

In February, Ashcroft took the rare step of appointing a "special attorney," Craig S. Morford, to investigate the prosecutors' conduct. The same month, Convertino filed a lawsuit against Ashcroft and the Justice Department, alleging that he was the target of a smear campaign that resulted in the unmasking of a valuable informant.

Convertino alleged that the terrorism cases were undermined by "gross mismanagement" and a "lack of support and cooperation, lack of effective assistance, lack of resources and intradepartmental infighting."

A legal source familiar with the case said yesterday that the government also failed to turn over a photo it had of the route to a facility overseas that it considered the target of a potential terrorism attack. The source said the photo did not match a sketch it had introduced at trial.

The source said the government also withheld from the defense an interview with a retired CIA agent whose testimony was not as strong as the government had hoped.

One piece of information withheld from the defense was a December 2001 letter, obtained by prosecutors, from a convicted drug dealer who wrote that a key prosecution witness, Youssef Hmimssa, told him while they were in jail together "how he lied to the FBI, how he fool'd the Secret Service agent on his case."

Equally significant, one defense lawyer said, was an FBI interview with a former roommate of two defendants who said the men never talked about religion, were lazy, and often drank and smoked. That was in direct contrast to the picture painted by Convertino, who said they were devout Muslims.


My points:
1) Shouldn't have happened in the first place
2) They aren't doing anything to make up for the destruction they've caused in these men's lives. Instead, they're going to get them for lying on some paperwork. So it's still a "gotcha."

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Storm Saxon
Member
Member # 3101

 - posted      Profile for Storm Saxon           Edit/Delete Post 
*shakes head*
Posts: 13123 | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kwea
Member
Member # 2199

 - posted      Profile for Kwea   Email Kwea         Edit/Delete Post 
Yes and no. Forging documents is one of the ways they coudl be helping terrorism....even if they don't know about it at the time.

I am sure that any time already served will probably be credited to them, and they will probably file a lawsuit against the goverment for gross misconduct...or maybe just against the lawyers who violated their rights.

Kwea

Posts: 15082 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2