FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Mobility Rights in the People's Republic (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Mobility Rights in the People's Republic
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
I have not found any evidence that it is expliciitly supported in the PRC Constitution.

However I have not found it in the US Constitution Either, I've only found it explititly implied in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Now, if we take recent announcement by PRC officials that 300,000,000 peasants will leave the country side for the urban cities we can take take it that individual and even group movements are okay. However large groups of movements while "okay" legally are not allowed in reality only to prevent the flooding of services and is regulated, we can only assume this and I'll ask from recently immigrated Chinese citizens next time I goto school.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
if we take recent announcement by PRC officials that 300,000,000 peasants will leave the country side for the urban cities we can take take it that individual and even group movements are okay.
Wow. You're less cynical than I am. I'd assume that they're mandating it. [Wink]
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Originally I was aware they werent letting some 30,000,000 citizens move into one of the SEZ's because that it would upset the local economy or something. They were allowed originally but stopped when it became unstable.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
Three hundred million people will move? During what time period? And of course the big question is WHY are they moving? Are they moving because the government tells them to? Are they moving because the government flooded their homes, farms and villages to make a new hydro-electric plant? Are they moving to pursue a personal dream for a better life?

300,000,000 people is the equivalent of 45 New York Cities. Does China have urban areas that sum to that size already? If NYC (which has fairly dense population as human settlements go, was 45x larger than it is today, for example, it would be the equivalent of a single dense urban area the size of the entire state of Maryland.

Or, put another way, 45 of the 50 states in the US would each have a city as large as NY city, just from the EXTRA people moving into urban environments.

If I were a betting man, I'd bet that China will be the source of the next pandemic if they go through with this plan.

I don't care how good their santitation is (and I hear it's not all that good), the rapid influx of that many people into an urban environment is going to overwhelm their sanitation systems and provide a perfect breeding ground for disease.

If this is really what is being "planned" and it's over a short period of time, I'd be tempted to call it a hidden program of genocide.

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
By the way, 300,000,000 is 30 new Shanghais.
Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
300 mil will move not because they are told to but because the economic growth is reaching a point where it is predicted that the agricultural populace will leave the countryside to pursue work in the cities and other lesser urban areas.

Its planned that this will happen within the next 35 years gradually as the economic boom increases.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dagonee
Member
Member # 5818

 - posted      Profile for Dagonee           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
However I have not found it in the US Constitution Either,
Wrong. It is embodied in two different provisions.

The fourteenth amendment makes anyone a citizen of whichever state they reside in:

quote:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
The Article IV privileges and immunities clause provides that citizens of state A must be treated the same as citizens of state B while they are within state B:

quote:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
Because citizens of state B may reside in state B, citizens of state A may reside there. And because residing in a state makes one a citizen, one is free to move between states as one wishes.

Taken together, this guarantees an interstate right to travel with three components:

quote:
the right of a citizen of one State to enter and to leave another State, the right to be treated as a welcome visitor rather than an unfriendly alien when temporarily present in the second State, and, for those travelers who elect to become permanent residents, the right to be treated like other citizens of that State. Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489, 500 (1999).

Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
cheiros do ender
Member
Member # 8849

 - posted      Profile for cheiros do ender   Email cheiros do ender         Edit/Delete Post 
Shanghai has more people in it than New York City? [Eek!]
Posts: 1138 | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
By a couple of million, yes.


Blayne...we're talking almost 10 million people a year. That's not gradual.

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
In a country that has in its different boom years in history has managed similar population movements. During the Great Leap Forward the urban population increased from 2-15%
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Morbo
Member
Member # 5309

 - posted      Profile for Morbo   Email Morbo         Edit/Delete Post 
I heard recently that China builds urban area for the equivilent population of Philidelphia every month.

Arguing about Chinese demographics is tricky, and fairly pointless, except in the broadest terms. They havn't done censuses (censi?) on a consistent basis, and the government is well known for fabricating statistics of all kinds.

Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
Blayne:

Do you consider the Great Leap Forward as having been particularly successful, and therefore a good model of how the State should handle future mass movement of people?

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lyrhawn
Member
Member # 7039

 - posted      Profile for Lyrhawn   Email Lyrhawn         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
300,000,000 people is the equivalent of 45 New York Cities.
Might just be easier to say that 300,000,000 is the equivalent of one United States of America.
Posts: 21898 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Morbo
Member
Member # 5309

 - posted      Profile for Morbo   Email Morbo         Edit/Delete Post 
Look out, BB, my "trick question" sense is tingling! Don't answer Bob! [Angst]
Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Noemon
Member
Member # 1115

 - posted      Profile for Noemon   Email Noemon         Edit/Delete Post 
Truly, Morbo, your powers of perception are honed to a razor's edge.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
aspectre
Member
Member # 2222

 - posted      Profile for aspectre           Edit/Delete Post 
"Out of 194 Asian cities with populations of more than one million, 98 are on the Chinese mainland and on Taiwan."
with 3 being on Taiwan.
Of the 299 most populous cities in the world, 97 are on the China mainland: the smallest has a population of 987thousand.

[ February 03, 2006, 02:45 AM: Message edited by: aspectre ]

Posts: 8501 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
And India STILL has a larger population.

[Eek!]

Really, I applaud their ability to plan for this kind of thing...if they can do it. I just worry about super-high population densities because they aren't good for people. I used to think they'd at least be good for the environment (pack the people in high-rises and you at least aren't destroying the rural areas for housing), but the pollution coming from urban dwellers is typically more per-capita than for urban dwellers, so I consider it kind of wash. Maybe it's different in China where the lower-tech rural dwellers are probably still burning fires for heat, in comparison to their urban counterparts who might use electricity and natural gas more.

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rakeesh
Member
Member # 2001

 - posted      Profile for Rakeesh   Email Rakeesh         Edit/Delete Post 
I think given the PRC's history in effective life-saving planning for this sort of thing, skepticism about their abilities in that area are totally justified.
Posts: 17164 | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
I've heard that their city dwellers burn coal mostly but I'm not sure I heard it second hand. As for the GLF, steel production did increase by 45% and the population did go from 450 mil to 600 mil people and according to Paul Kennedy in "The Rise and Fall of the great Powers" China's economic growth was amazing between 1949 to 1968(?) until the Cultural Revolution, inwhich with Deng's Reforms Paul geustimated that their total economic strength would've been 20 years ahead, this given that his initial estimate of China overcoming France in GDP terms happens 25 years ahead of schedual well...

Now I am not argueing that millions did die of starvation but lets at least be glad that it wasn't intentional starvation like Stalin did, at least it was because zeal overcame good judgement plus the lack of a suitable scientific community to tell them that their goals (overcoming the steel production of the world in 30 years) was absolutely impossible and insane. And all this because of the Soviets launched Sputnik. [Roll Eyes]

Its not that its planned its just an economic prediction as Modernization and economic growth continues at its average current rate.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Morbo
Member
Member # 5309

 - posted      Profile for Morbo   Email Morbo         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
As for the GLF, steel production did increase by 45% and the population did go from 450 mil to 600 mil people and according to Paul Kennedy in "The Rise and Fall of the great Powers" China's economic growth was amazing between 1949 to 1968(?) until the Cultural Revolution, inwhich with Deng's Reforms Paul geustimated that their total economic strength would've been 20 years ahead, this given that his initial estimate of China overcoming France in GDP terms happens 25 years ahead of schedual well...

Now I am not argueing that millions did die of starvation but lets at least be glad that it wasn't intentional starvation like Stalin did, at least it was because zeal overcame good judgement plus the lack of a suitable scientific community to tell them that their goals (overcoming the steel production of the world in 30 years) was absolutely impossible and insane. And all this because of the Soviets launched Sputnik. [Roll Eyes]

Its not that its planned its just an economic prediction as Modernization and economic growth continues at its average current rate.

Deng was purged twice in the Cultural Revolution, they were hardly "Deng's reforms," Blayne.
quote:
During the Great Leap, the Chinese economy initially grew, and iron production increased 45% in 1958 and a combined 30% over the next two years, but plummeted in 1961, and would not reach the level it was at in 1958 until 1964.
edit: corrected wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward
And most of that "increase" in iron production was just iron products melted in villages. Hence the rapid plunge in production in 1961. Any country could artificially increase it's iron "production" by melting much of it's iron products into useless iron blobs...but it's pretty pointless and stupid.

How you can nonchalantly try to argue away what some have called the largest famine in human history is very telling.

[ February 03, 2006, 02:58 PM: Message edited by: Morbo ]

Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:

Now I am not argueing that millions did die of starvation but lets at least be glad that it wasn't intentional starvation like Stalin did, at least it was because zeal overcame good judgement plus the lack of a suitable scientific community to tell them that their goals (overcoming the steel production of the world in 30 years) was absolutely impossible and insane.

*blink* Do you think the people would have continued to starve by focusing their efforts on melting down iron if the government hadn't forced them to do so, while preventing them from growing food?
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
No one was forced to do it, millions left towns and cities to work on communal farms for the very purpose of smelting iron, and for those thatdidnt know how instead from that sources they could find tried to do so.

Deng was purged twice yes but in 1978 it was HIS reforms that allowed the countries GDP to QUADROUPLE between 1978-1987 around the time "The Rise and Fall" was published.

Deng was in countrol of the party from behind the scenes after 1978.

Also dontyou think a reason for that plummet aside from much of the useless Pig Iron could've been because of the starvations which have been reasonably accosiated with the string of natural disasters and draughts? Sure the huge distraction from agriculture is a large factor but be aware it is a good deal better then Stalins deliberate and organized Famines.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
No one was forced to do it, millions left towns and cities to work on communal farms for the very purpose of smelting iron
Yes, Blayne. Now let's fill in the other blank: WHY would people leave a place with food to go smelt iron? Smelting iron is very unpleasant. And many of the people who went to smelt iron starved.

What reason did they have for melting down their own stuff in order to meet ridiculous iron quotas, do you think?

Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Morbo
Member
Member # 5309

 - posted      Profile for Morbo   Email Morbo         Edit/Delete Post 
But 1978 is considerably after the Cultural Revolution. And so were Deng's reforms.
Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rakeesh
Member
Member # 2001

 - posted      Profile for Rakeesh   Email Rakeesh         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
What reason did they have for melting down their own stuff in order to meet ridiculous iron quotas, do you think?
Probably due to American anti-Communist propaganda, distributed into the PRC, stating that the average Chinese had a massive iron deficiency in their diets.
Posts: 17164 | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Wrong, the reforms started in 1978, 2 years after Mao's death. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deng_Xiaoping
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BaoQingTian
Member
Member # 8775

 - posted      Profile for BaoQingTian   Email BaoQingTian         Edit/Delete Post 
While the amount of facts you know about the PRC continues to amaze and impress me Blayne, the almost inversely proportionate relationship of those facts to your knowledge of the PRC stuns me in a different sort of way.
Posts: 1412 | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Morbo
Member
Member # 5309

 - posted      Profile for Morbo   Email Morbo         Edit/Delete Post 
Ahh, I misread this sentence:"until the Cultural Revolution, inwhich with Deng's Reforms"

I assumed you meant Deng's reforms during the Cultural Revolution.

Carry on with the agitprop. [Wink]

Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
I did not mean DURING the cultural revolution, that was a simple grammar mistake.

"While the amount of facts you know about the PRC continues to amaze and impress me Blayne, the almost inversely proportionate relationship of those facts to your knowledge of the PRC stuns me in a different sort of way."

wtf, I'm afraid I don't understand what you meant.

I consider myself more knowledgeable then most people I know. I'm planning on going to China myself to double check + to stake out the grounds so when I become a trained programming and graphics designer I'll have a job.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Morbo
Member
Member # 5309

 - posted      Profile for Morbo   Email Morbo         Edit/Delete Post 
He means that you seem blind to the faults and motives of the Chinese Communist Party and Mao in particular, while knowing a lot of facts about them. Also, you integrate the facts in odd ways, that don't seem logical to most westerners.
Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
That's just me I geuss. :/
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Morbo
Member
Member # 5309

 - posted      Profile for Morbo   Email Morbo         Edit/Delete Post 
Let me rephrase that: that don't seem logical to me. I can hardly speak for most westerners.
Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Morbo
Member
Member # 5309

 - posted      Profile for Morbo   Email Morbo         Edit/Delete Post 
Blayne, have you read much of dissidents, critics and exiles of the PRC? (I have not.)

If not, why not try to get a more balanced view of China before you make up your mind? What have you got to lose? By balanced, I don't mean agreeing with me or anyone, just more facts will help you understand China even better, it's triumphs and failures.

Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
In many cases I have and even revised my opinion of the GLF and the Cultural Revolution somewhat but I have yet to reach that Chapter in Mao Biography in a book called "Mao: A Life" by I think Phillip Short.

But however, I see more in China then just "ChiComms" I also see many accomlishments, as welll as some collasol failures but I prefered to find explanations for them rather then fixing the blame on single individuals or gorups but willing to allow them to share the blame with other possible mitigating circumstances, I also factor in intent. It was Stalins intent to Starve his peasants, it was Mao's intent to modernize and to build values not to starve them.

I have read some of those testimonials but I have seen similar cases within the United States so i wasn't impressed and the more inflamatory ones, were placed in VERY biased newspapers who seem to make a living on announcing to the world that the "CCP are evil and must be crushed" kind of think, blindly ignoring the many millions who would die and the very few who would benefit.

Also, some of those newspapers such as the Teipai Times if I'm not mistaken are heavily influenced by the Falun Gong who to the consensus reached by some of the local Christians and other religious people at my school (who dont always share my opinions btw) agree that its a cult, why? Because its leader has been known to say hes the creator of the Universe and that you do not need to go to hospitols for cancer treatment etc.

Alot of the "Anti-PRC/CCP" news sources have all managed to make their way predominantly into the realm of wild eye wacko's, racists, and those with an interest to see that the PRC finds trouble with its peaceful development. And of course, fringe groups, political exiles, and other interest groups.

Now lets look at some of the political exiles, I know of one famous case where a PRC "spy master" in the PRC Embassy in Australia was said to have defected and brought with him the information of "thousands of spies" etc etc.

Yet, if we look closer he was facing trial for corruption charges, stole millions of dollars of tax payers money and fled at the first sign of trouble. The Aussies never mentioned what sort of information he recieved and I've found no news from my Australian contact of ANY arrests of Chinese Nationals/Spies and nothing came out of this story.

You, alot of the Counter-PRC arguements I've found were very faulty, and others can be attributed to China's large size. The 10,000 executions per year statistic though I've found no information supporting it yet (I haven't really looked to confirm it but I'm assuming its true for the sake of the arguement) so there's 10k per year, now this is a country that has a population of 1.3 billion people, with a population density though I'm not sure that is obviously bigger then the United States, and because they've culturally never known a laisser-faire system of justice as known in the west simply prefer capitol punishment for severe crimes, which btw include drug abuse.


Now as for mobility rights, I've no clue. I've found nothing with the constituion of the People's Republic that points to it though I haven't looked very hard.

http://english.people.com.cn/constitution/constitution.html

My eyes very good if anyone can find it for me I'ld be appreciative.

Maybe its just assumed?

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kwea
Member
Member # 2199

 - posted      Profile for Kwea   Email Kwea         Edit/Delete Post 
By you, perhaps.
Posts: 15082 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Morbo
Member
Member # 5309

 - posted      Profile for Morbo   Email Morbo         Edit/Delete Post 
Have you read anything by political exiles not accused of corruption?
quote:
Now lets look at some of the political exiles, I know of one famous case where a PRC "spy master" in the PRC Embassy in Australia was said to have defected and brought with him the information of "thousands of spies" etc etc.Yet, if we look closer he was facing trial for corruption charges, stole millions of dollars of tax payers money and fled at the first sign of trouble.

That actually is a black mark against the Party, not exiles in general. The Party is said to be rife with corruption that is not properly investigated by the authorities. For example, lots of the money that was supposed to pay for relocating villagers affected the Three Gorges Dam was stolen by corrupt officials, with villagers forcibly relocated yet left homeless while the officials (the ones who got away, anyway) often going into exile with state money.

Actually, your very use of the word "defect" undermines any case for "Mobility Rights in the People's Republic." Whether or not citizens have mobility rights in the PRC, they certainly do NOT have the right to enter or leave the PRC at will--it's strictly controlled by the government.

Whereas in the US and other democracies, any citizen not a wanted criminal is free to enter or leave the US whenever they wish (with some caveats, like Cuba, visas, etc.)

Which system seems more fair to it's citizens, Blayne?

Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Except the ones who as far as we can tell weren't allowed to leave were criminals, I know plenty of other emmigrants who left of their own free will.

And here; Numbers don't lie: http://english.people.com.cn/200602/04/eng20060204_240126.html

and here: http://english.people.com.cn/200602/04/eng20060204_240123.html

seems to be part of the move.

[ February 04, 2006, 02:31 PM: Message edited by: Blayne Bradley ]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Morbo
Member
Member # 5309

 - posted      Profile for Morbo   Email Morbo         Edit/Delete Post 
You are quite right, Blayne. Apparently foreign travel restrictions have eased considerably in the past 20 years.
quote:
Compared with 20 years ago, the number of citizens going abroad with a private passport has jumped 50-fold.
But there are still defections by people afraid to return to China.
quote:
Now lets look at some of the political exiles, I know of one famous case where a PRC "spy master" in the PRC Embassy in Australia was said to have defected and brought with him the information of "thousands of spies" etc etc.Yet, if we look closer he was facing trial for corruption charges, stole millions of dollars of tax payers money and fled at the first sign of trouble.
Are you talking about the diplomat Chen Yonglin? If so, could you provide links detailing his corruption? The main thing I found was a Chinese official claiming he defected because Austraila has a higher standard of livingAlso, note that denouncing defectors is a standard practice of the PRC and the former USSR, charges that are frequently shown to be complete BS.
Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Oh God, its going to take me years to find it, its part of a thread that lasted 178 pages in another forum that is the online version of a soup opera. [Big Grin]
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
answer to ender, remember the hundreds of millions of migrant workers???

people are allowed to work in other cities and provinces, especially if their home province is poor and can't support them. but the problem is that their ID still identify them as from that province, and different rules apply to people from different area. for example the national university exam. if you are from my province of jiangsu, the marks needed are extremly high, but if you are from shanghai, which is just across the river, you can be an idiot and get in good universities like beijing and tsinghua.

immigration to other countries is a different story. some groups are not allowed to emmigrate such as military officers, some scientists, but generally emmigrating to other countries is a lot more relaxed now than before, but is still harder than say Canada.

btw, i was born in the PRC, but i spend most of my life in Canada.

He lives in Edmonton Alberta.... [Mad] the little runt with no income tax grr.

That was his anwser to my question about mobility rights here's his anwser to some other more touchy questions.

The questions are:
quote:
I have some questions...As most of you know I'm not Chinese..

1. Can any citizen of the PRC establish a church of his own choice reguardless of religion?

2. Can any citizen of the PRC buy a home?

3. Can any citizen buy a car?

4. Is the internet as "free" (open) as it is in the USA or does the PRC government censor some sites?

5. Can any citizen of the PRC stand on any "street corner" and and say anti-government sayings ina non threating manner?

quote:
well, i do not think you can just establish a church of your own in china, unless you got a ok form the government. but you can easily estabalished a 'underground' reglion, and the CCP doesn't really care as long as you don't try to spread anti-government idea. that's how FaLunGong group expanded before the government announce them as a cult.
the things may change a little after FLG riot. govenment defintely will be more strict on reglious matter now i think.

of course we can, otherwise where we could live? on street? actually, you can buy as many home as you like as long as you have the money. nowadays, more chinese choose to get a installment plan since the house/apartment price is ridiculous high!
PS. in 2006, the chinese government forbid all the estate agent to build villas, since they consume more land.

of course we can, chinese automoblie production has just became the second-largest in the world one month ago. my family currently own two cars, my father drive a toyota,and my mother drive a mazada, although i strongly support the idea of boycott japanese product,they do not listen to me [Mad]

no chinese internet is not as 'free' as America's, censorship is strict those days!(actually one of my friend's adult webpage has just been blockade yesterday! ) anti-chinese government webpage and pornographic webpage are blockade for chinese users. but there are some softwares that could crack CCP's 'fire wall'.
chinese internet user is currently the second largest in number.over 100 milion chinese people using internet everyday, internet is international, that's something the CCP could not possibiliy gain fully control, the idea of chinese people being 'brainwash' by 'western propaganda' really scare them.
but if you ever visit china,just try talk to the ordinary people, you will find out that this censorship is acutally quite useless, their information accessibility is no less than rest of the world.

why? it a pretty senseless and a stupid thing to do. the economy is booming, many people are getting rich. no one will trade them all just because the USA tell them the CCP is evil! china needs to be industrialized, the people need to earn more money, as long as CCP is still doing the right job, why do we want a revolution?
ok, back to your question,if you saying anti-govenment saying on the street, i don't know, you might end up getting some attentions and then policeman might come and ask you to stop. they are not going to arrest you unless you doing something 'too much'.
i am not defending CCP's reputation here, and i am not denying china is still lack of freedom, all i am saying here is,the people's everyday life in china is no different from people who live in UK or US(i don't see people say anti-govenment saying on the street in UK everyday,why chinese should do that? [Confused] ),we are not bunch of slaves that driven by the government like some western media's horrific describation!


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
i don't see people say anti-govenment saying on the street in UK everyday
This is clearly someone who hasn't been to Britain. [Smile]
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BaoQingTian
Member
Member # 8775

 - posted      Profile for BaoQingTian   Email BaoQingTian         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, the evil CCP wouldn't allow people living there to see it on TV or over the internet either...you wouldn't want to give your citizens any ideas like that [Wink]
Posts: 1412 | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
*twitch*
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BaoQingTian
Member
Member # 8775

 - posted      Profile for BaoQingTian   Email BaoQingTian         Edit/Delete Post 
It was just a joke Blayne, no worries [Smile]
Posts: 1412 | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Thats why all I did was *twitch*. I remember all to well that on abovetopsecret.com there are many idiots who rant about it, its like they're getting paid to troll.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rakeesh
Member
Member # 2001

 - posted      Profile for Rakeesh   Email Rakeesh         Edit/Delete Post 
I think it's indicitive of a deep problem that someone would say, "Why? It's a stupid thing to do," in response to someone asking, "Can you make public statements critical of the government?"

You routinely trust your buddies more than you trust organizations such as Human Rights Watch, Blayne. Your buddies-the few you actually know and the many you speak to online, that font of accuracy-probably know better than stupid organizations like HRW.

Posts: 17164 | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
HRW is a large organization dedicated to keeping track of human rights abuses, there there just to document it not to determine the circumstances I trust people actually living and working or who come from China then from a faceless organization.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rakeesh
Member
Member # 2001

 - posted      Profile for Rakeesh   Email Rakeesh         Edit/Delete Post 
So...under what "circumstances", exactly, would you permit your right to peacefully assemble be abridged?

Wait, I forgot your basic principle for talking about the PRC: it's OK for them to have their basic political and human rights violated, because they live in spiffy China. But if that happened to me, here in Canada?! By God there'd be hell to pay!

It's that fundamental hypocrisy which makes nearly every single thing you say about the PRC so contemptible. It's not that you so blatantly disregard any information that comes from anyone critical of the PRC, it's that you're so in love with the mystique that is the PRC, you're willing to actually applaud that part of the mystique which you personally would not bear for even a second where you live today.

Posts: 17164 | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Umm since when was I a hypocrit? The cultural and historical circumstance between Canada and China are lightyears different, its justified to maintain social order if it means China can catch up to the west even a decade faster.

As for peaceably assemble...

http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/showthread.php?t=1284

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
its justified to maintain social order if it means China can catch up to the west even a decade faster
Blayne, here's the thing: I do NOT want China to "catch up to the West" any faster at ALL unless it manages to catch up ethically just as fast.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2