FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Richard Dawkins' Growing up in the Universe

   
Author Topic: Richard Dawkins' Growing up in the Universe
Strider
Member
Member # 1807

 - posted      Profile for Strider   Email Strider         Edit/Delete Post 
This is a great 2 dvd set that has just recently been released. It's a lecture series called The Royal Institution Christmas Lectures for Children which is done every year, and back in 1991 Richard Dawkins was the lecturer. The lectures deal mostly with evolution and Richard Dawkins attempts(and succeeds I think) at explaining our universe in a way young people can understand(I wouldn't recommend it for children of too young an age, probably good for preteens and young teens). He uses animation, pictures, props, and simple experiments to explain many scientific principles. Even as an adult who is familiar with all this information, I thoroughly enjoyed the lectures. All proceeds benefit the Richard Dawkins Foundation For Reason and Science, which is mainly why I bought it.

Link

Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Euripides
Member
Member # 9315

 - posted      Profile for Euripides   Email Euripides         Edit/Delete Post 
I've placed my order. [Smile]
Posts: 1762 | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Strider
Member
Member # 1807

 - posted      Profile for Strider   Email Strider         Edit/Delete Post 
I thought you might. [Smile]
Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Teshi
Member
Member # 5024

 - posted      Profile for Teshi   Email Teshi         Edit/Delete Post 
Haha, my family watches these every Christmas. Most of them are pretty good [Smile] .
Posts: 8473 | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
enochville
Member
Member # 8815

 - posted      Profile for enochville   Email enochville         Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, I had heard about this and watched the trailer, but neither the trailer nor the website were all that informative. So, thank you for sharing a little more about it.
Posts: 264 | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Strider
Member
Member # 1807

 - posted      Profile for Strider   Email Strider         Edit/Delete Post 
no problem, just doing my part as an unofficial member of the Richard Dawkins fan club!
Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Leonide
Member
Member # 4157

 - posted      Profile for Leonide   Email Leonide         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm having trouble ordering through the website (which admittedly might be just my computer) -- question, though, how do you have the DVDs already when it says they won't be released til April 30th?
Posts: 3516 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Strider
Member
Member # 1807

 - posted      Profile for Strider   Email Strider         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm not really sure. I pre-ordered it not expecting to get it for a while, and then one day got an email saying it was shipping out.

Maybe that release date is the "official" release date but they're shipping out pre-orders early?

Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
aspectre
Member
Member # 2222

 - posted      Profile for aspectre           Edit/Delete Post 
The Self-Made Universe, which was proposed in it's first form as a question by Schroedinger,
"Is the World without an observer like a play without an audience: unseen and thus, quite properly, not existing?

And indications are reality is not exactly all it is cracked up to be.
http://www.upscale.utoronto.ca/GeneralInterest/Harrison/BellsTheorem/BellsTheorem.html
http://www.physorg.com/news96027669.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-theory
http://www.npl.washington.edu/TI/

Posts: 8501 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Strider
Member
Member # 1807

 - posted      Profile for Strider   Email Strider         Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting links. I'm not sure how they relate to this thread though.

Davies spoke at a conference recently called Beyond Belief. So I've heard his theories before.

Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Leonide
Member
Member # 4157

 - posted      Profile for Leonide   Email Leonide         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, my order went through finally! stupid computer. *eagerly awaits!*
Posts: 3516 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Euripides
Member
Member # 9315

 - posted      Profile for Euripides   Email Euripides         Edit/Delete Post 
This should be interesting but unpleasant and predictable.
Posts: 1762 | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nato
Member
Member # 1448

 - posted      Profile for Nato   Email Nato         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by aspectre:
[QB] And indications are reality is not exactly all it is cracked up to be.

quote:
the link said:
The articles describe results that show that quantum mechanics describes the behavior of a system better than a principle called "local realism."

Local realism can be understood fairly easily: the properties of particles can be completely described, and those properties remain localized, meaning that properties can't be transmitted to a different location faster than the speed of light. That probably sounds reasonable, but those of you familiar with quantum entanglement are probably already recognizing a problem here.

Two entangled items, which can include photons moving at the speed of light, have properties that are linked. Measuring the properties of one of these items will cause the other to instantly switch from an indeterminate state to one with properties defined by its entanglement with the other. Since the entangled items can be far apart when this occurs, the transfer of properties appears to be taking place faster than the speed of light.

Does this mean we might be able to build an ansible sometime?
Posts: 1592 | Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Strider
Member
Member # 1807

 - posted      Profile for Strider   Email Strider         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
This should be interesting but unpleasant and predictable.
I watched the Sam Harris interviews and was really surprised by how O'Reilly conducted himself both times. He didn't flip out at all and thanked Sam Harris both times for being honest and called his ideas provocative. I found myself not loathing the man as much as I usually do. I found it amusing that he called the beliefs of islamic suicide bombers ridiculous and crazy, but at the same time stuck up for his own religious beliefs. Sam Harris made the great point that while the behavior it produces may be different, the irrational logic and unquestioned faith that leads to it is the same.

Given that Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins have EXTREMELY similar ideas about religion's place in society, I wonder if O'Reilly will act in a similar vain towards Dawkins. I'm thinking no, and I'm thinking he's going to be more on the attack.

I think Dawkins will be fine on the show though. His razor sharp wit and logic should do fine against O'Reilly's bullying techniques.

Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nato
Member
Member # 1448

 - posted      Profile for Nato   Email Nato         Edit/Delete Post 
I just watched those Sam Harris interviews myself. That was a pretty good interview. I didn't even pull my hair out. I'll have to remember to watch the Dawkins interview on Monday.
Posts: 1592 | Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Euripides
Member
Member # 9315

 - posted      Profile for Euripides   Email Euripides         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Strider:
quote:
This should be interesting but unpleasant and predictable.
I watched the Sam Harris interviews and was really surprised by how O'Reilly conducted himself both times. He didn't flip out at all and thanked Sam Harris both times for being honest and called his ideas provocative. I found myself not loathing the man as much as I usually do. I found it amusing that he called the beliefs of islamic suicide bombers ridiculous and crazy, but at the same time stuck up for his own religious beliefs. Sam Harris made the great point that while the behavior it produces may be different, the irrational logic and unquestioned faith that leads to it is the same.

Given that Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins have EXTREMELY similar ideas about religion's place in society, I wonder if O'Reilly will act in a similar vain towards Dawkins. I'm thinking no, and I'm thinking he's going to be more on the attack.

I think Dawkins will be fine on the show though. His razor sharp wit and logic should do fine against O'Reilly's bullying techniques.

Agreed on all points. I was also pleasantly surprised by O'Reilly's conduct in the Sam Harris interviews. And despite Harris and Dawkins having pretty much the same ideas, Dawkins does have a more 'provocative' reputation.
Posts: 1762 | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nato
Member
Member # 1448

 - posted      Profile for Nato   Email Nato         Edit/Delete Post 
I just realized this morning that one of my friends gave me a disc with a blurry copy of these lectures on it a year or so ago, but I never watched them. It looks like they were taped off of TV or transferred from VHS, but I have been listening to the first part "Waking up in the Universe" for a little while now.

I found so far, that I am also familiar with the information he is talking about. I like the examples he uses. I wish I had seen them ten years ago. [Smile]

Posts: 1592 | Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Strider
Member
Member # 1807

 - posted      Profile for Strider   Email Strider         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I wish I had seen them ten years ago
ditto.
Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JumboWumbo
Member
Member # 10047

 - posted      Profile for JumboWumbo   Email JumboWumbo         Edit/Delete Post 
Empirical observations? Science is so overrated.
Posts: 213 | Registered: Jan 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Strider
Member
Member # 1807

 - posted      Profile for Strider   Email Strider         Edit/Delete Post 
Dawkins on O'Reilly

Well, it didn't go all that bad. I wish it was longer, and I wish O'Reilly would've let Dawkins get more than a few words in here and there.

O'Reilly's argument that we should believe in God because how else could life have happened was pretty weak, and I was upset that Dawkins didn't rip into it.

Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nato
Member
Member # 1448

 - posted      Profile for Nato   Email Nato         Edit/Delete Post 
I suppose you can't really have a Hatrack-depth discussion about something like this in three minutes.

I don't think they really got into anything of weight in the little segment they allowed.

Posts: 1592 | Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Strider
Member
Member # 1807

 - posted      Profile for Strider   Email Strider         Edit/Delete Post 
Fascinating lecture by Dawkins

Nothing to do with religion and only minimaly to do with evolution, Dawkins talks about the human mind in relation to the true nature(and weirdness) of the universe.

Coming in at 20 minutes it's not too long, and yet helped feed my Dawkins addiction(the O'Reilly interview was barely and appetizer).

Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Euripides
Member
Member # 9315

 - posted      Profile for Euripides   Email Euripides         Edit/Delete Post 
With the O'Reilly show, I was more disappointed that the Stalin-Hitler-Mao-Pol Pot argument was sort of left hanging. The moustache quip was completely appropriate, but I can imagine many people dismissing it off-hand as ridiculous.
Posts: 1762 | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2