posted
I just recently reread Pastwatch, and after reading it for the first time in a few years, one big thing struck me. How valid is the theory that slavery emerged from human sacrifice? Did OSC simply formulate this theory based entirely on the evidence he presents in the book, or are there actual historians/anthropologists/etc who actually support this(and if there are, could you please point me toward them)?
Posts: 76 | Registered: Aug 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Is that what he says in the book? I haven't read it in years. Might have to pick it up again.
As a very, very, very amateur historian, it has always been my guess that slavery emerged as a natural consequence of war. Which you might be able to argue is an abstract form of human sacrifice, if you believe you're fighting to satisfy a deity.
Posts: 3852 | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's been years since I read it as well, but I don't recall OSC formulating this theory in the book. I recall that the slavery conquest of Europe over the New World was a result of removing the human sacrifice conquest of the New World over the East, but not that slavery arose from human sacrifice directly.
But like I said, it's been years so I could be wrong.
Posts: 1080 | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I remember that idea from OSC's story "Atlantis", which was significantly shortened to become a chapter in Pastwatch.
Posts: 16551 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
The idea was more that in Atlantis, which is discovered via Pastwatch, one innovative thinker decided not to kill the human sacrifices but instead use them for labor, as a result this thinker started gaining status in the society with the new source of labor, and the practice caught on and replaced human sacrifice. The argument put out in the book, among other arguments, is that this was the reason the tribes in the America did not adopt slavery - they retained human sacrifice and as such never stepped away from it.
I'm curious if that theory holds any actual weight - are there anthropologists who support the idea that human sacrifice is what evolved into slavery?
Also, I was wondering if the whole potential invasion of europe that is put forth in the book also has any actual basis.
Posts: 76 | Registered: Aug 2009
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
