FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Mandate

   
Author Topic: Mandate
The Pixiest
Member
Member # 1863

 - posted      Profile for The Pixiest   Email The Pixiest         Edit/Delete Post 
http://vote2003.ss.ca.gov/Returns/gov/00.htm
http://vote2003.ss.ca.gov/Returns/recall/00.htm

With 98.6% reporting

Arnold: 48.1% 3,577,278
Davis (No On Recall): 45.2% 3,488,465
Mecha Member: 32.2% 2,388,314
McClintock: 13.3% 985,394

So Arnold out polled Davis despite splitting the vote with McClintock. 61.4% of the vote went to a Republican.

Democrats could vote No on recall AND vote for Bustamonte so there was no split to that vote.

Democrats are threatening a revenge recall but with 7.5 million votes cast plus an estimated 2 million absentee ballots, they will have to collect apx 1.14 million signatures. Much more than the recall Davis team needed (but far less than they got.)

Pix

[edit: fixed bad math. Added No On Recall votes by accident.]

[ October 08, 2003, 11:28 AM: Message edited by: The Pixiest ]

Posts: 7085 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Irami Osei-Frimpong
Member
Member # 2229

 - posted      Profile for Irami Osei-Frimpong   Email Irami Osei-Frimpong         Edit/Delete Post 
How does he have 3.75 million out of ten million votes cast, and still show up with 48.1 percent?
Posts: 5600 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robespierre
Member
Member # 5779

 - posted      Profile for Robespierre   Email Robespierre         Edit/Delete Post 
The votes listed above total 6,950,986. You should not count the "Davis" votes, as most of those who voted no on the recall, voted for Bustamonte.
Posts: 859 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Pixiest
Member
Member # 1863

 - posted      Profile for The Pixiest   Email The Pixiest         Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, but I SHOULD count all the non-listed votes for governer like Peter Comejo, Gary Coleman, Larry Flint, etc.

Also bare in mind that only 98.6% of precincts had reported as of the above numbers.

Posts: 7085 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dan_raven
Member
Member # 3383

 - posted      Profile for Dan_raven   Email Dan_raven         Edit/Delete Post 
And before proclaiming this a mandate for Republican's remember that Arnold is a fiscal conservative, but a social moderate, almost liberal. This made him acceptable to many of the Democratic voters.

Not all the people who voted for Arnold will vote for Bush.

Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
fugu13
Member
Member # 2859

 - posted      Profile for fugu13   Email fugu13         Edit/Delete Post 
Hehehe, I can't wait until everyone sees what Arnold's fiscal policy is really like. I predict it will be not as conservative as you might think. To understand more of why I am predicting this, take a look at his advisors.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Storm Saxon
Member
Member # 3101

 - posted      Profile for Storm Saxon           Edit/Delete Post 
If anyone wants to post the vote breakdown by race/age/income, that would be cool.
Posts: 13123 | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Pixiest
Member
Member # 1863

 - posted      Profile for The Pixiest   Email The Pixiest         Edit/Delete Post 
Dan, it's a Mandate for Arnold.
Posts: 7085 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, I think it's a mandate for famous people. [Smile]
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Pixiest
Member
Member # 1863

 - posted      Profile for The Pixiest   Email The Pixiest         Edit/Delete Post 
Such a generality, Tom. You should know better.
Posts: 7085 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think it's general at all. I think people were voting for something -- anything -- different, and responded like lemmings to the media.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MaureenJanay
Member
Member # 2935

 - posted      Profile for MaureenJanay   Email MaureenJanay         Edit/Delete Post 
No way, Tom. I'm sure they voted for him because of his strong stance on...uhhh....well, I mean, he's a great supporter of...

Okay, maybe it WAS his super-stardom.

Posts: 264 | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sarfa
Member
Member # 579

 - posted      Profile for sarfa   Email sarfa         Edit/Delete Post 
Now come on, it was not his super stardom that won him the election at all. It is the fact that he is a robot. Everyone knows that robots make better than governors than regular people.
Posts: 748 | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JonnyNotSoBravo
Member
Member # 5715

 - posted      Profile for JonnyNotSoBravo   Email JonnyNotSoBravo         Edit/Delete Post 
I agree that he's a robot. I think Maria Shriver programs him every week, and when Californians elected Arnold, they really elected Maria (we have another Kennedy in office). She stocks him with lots of good catch phrases, but he doesn't have a lot of positions on anything because he wasn't programmed to have any but a few of the basics. I mean hey, she's got kids and a household to run, and a career in journalism. She doesn't have a whole lotta time for programming!

Edited for clarity...

[ October 08, 2003, 11:34 PM: Message edited by: JonnyNotSoBravo ]

Posts: 1423 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Scott R
Member
Member # 567

 - posted      Profile for Scott R   Email Scott R         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
And before proclaiming this a mandate for Republican's remember that Arnold is a fiscal conservative, but a social moderate, almost liberal.
[Confused]

The worst of both worlds. . .

Posts: 14554 | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Annie
Member
Member # 295

 - posted      Profile for Annie   Email Annie         Edit/Delete Post 
ha ha ha! I totally agree with you there, Scott
Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BannaOj
Member
Member # 3206

 - posted      Profile for BannaOj   Email BannaOj         Edit/Delete Post 
See, that is what I personally (though no longer a resident of CA) would vote for, a fiscal conservative but a social liberal.

How many "moderates" out there would go exactly the opposite and want a social conservative but a fiscal liberal?

AJ

Posts: 11265 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2