The central library branch of our local library was set on fire by an arsonist Sunday night. The sprinkler system put out the fire, but at least 6,000 books were damaged, and the library's closed for a week while cleanup goes on.
Friends told me about this and I couldn't believe it, I wondered if they were playing some kind of cruel joke on me... I just can't understand why anyone would set fire to a library... I know other kinds of vandalism goes on, but, a library???
One good thing = thanks to the huge amount of books I had checked out, that many less books were in the building at the time of the fire to get damaged...
Posts: 2911 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
It reminded me, though, of the way our local library saved money when they moved into their new building. To save moving costs, they asked everyone to check out 10 books, and check them in at the new building.
Posts: 5948 | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
jeniwren, that's a great way of handling it, at least in theory. To what degree did people participate?
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Significantly enough that it worked, I think. It was before I moved here. I heard about it last year when they started talking about moving again.
Posts: 5948 | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
That's a great solution to the problem! I'll have to recommend that to the local library if they ever need to move a lot of books.
It's really sad that someone would burn a library. Is there any indication whether the person was actually upset at the contents of the library or whether it was a thrill-seeker wanting to cause trouble?
By the way, I'm all for burning individual books. It raises book sales. Thank you, paranoid fundamentalists, for helping to make Harry Potter a best-seller!
posted
The article makes reference to cataloging the damaged books for insurance purposes, so I'd assume that they do.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
The only upside to the burning of the Downtown L.A. library (how many years has it been now? 15?) is that the rebuilt library is incredibly cool.
I don't understand arson of any building; but I agree that burning a library is particularly incomprehensible.
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
The things people do to get out of paying an overdue book fee.
There is also the possibility that the arsonist was stealing some valuable rare books, and lit the fire so that no one would know what had been taken.
This would be especially helpful if the theif was an insider and stole books over a long period of time to sell to book dealers. Then when they were about to be discovered, they set fire to the library. Any missing books would then be assumed to have burnt away.
I read a book on book collectors. Such things have happened. When a Guttenberg bible sells for millions, and other collectors will buy no questions asked, and you are holding one small book no one ever reads, that can net you $50,000, some librarians have been known to succumb to the temptation.
Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah, you know what... This guy should become a REAL arsonist and try to burn down an asbestos factory.
Posts: 4816 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |