FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Federal Prosecutor Sues Ashcroft

   
Author Topic: Federal Prosecutor Sues Ashcroft
sndrake
Member
Member # 4941

 - posted      Profile for sndrake   Email sndrake         Edit/Delete Post 
Not a good day for Ashcroft or anti-terrorism efforts. Not sure there's a way for the administration to put a good spin on this one.

Prosecutor in Terror Case Sues Ashcroft

quote:
WASHINGTON - The Justice Department has exaggerated its performance in the war on terrorism, interfered with a major terror prosecution and compromised a confidential informant, a federal prosecutor has alleged in an extraordinary lawsuit against Attorney General John Ashcroft.

The lawsuit by Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Convertino is the latest twist in the Bush administration's first major post-Sept. 11 terrorism prosecution, a Detroit case jeopardized over allegations of prosecutorial misconduct.


Posts: 4344 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lalo
Member
Member # 3772

 - posted      Profile for Lalo   Email Lalo         Edit/Delete Post 
Ha! You GO, girl!
Posts: 3293 | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm a little confused by the article. It sounds as if Convertino himself is on trial for something (obstruction perhaps) based on not turning over evidence to defense attorneys but he now says blames the Justice Department for that lapse?

Am I misreading this?

I just want to be careful here. It sounds like maybe this guy might be hiding behind whistle-blower statutes.

However, I think Ashcroft is still to blame.

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sndrake
Member
Member # 4941

 - posted      Profile for sndrake   Email sndrake         Edit/Delete Post 
Bob,

I agree it's hard to tell exactly what the facts are, but it kind of looks like a "lose-lose" situation for the administration.

No matter what, it's not exactly an advertisement for an effective war against terrorism. So, even if the blame for the apparent problems with the prosecution fall on the prosecutor, it calls attention to one more conviction that could be overturned.

Either way, not the kind of thing public relations people like to work with.

Posts: 4344 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, it sure looks that way. I found a better article in the Washington Post. Unfortunately, you have to join to view, so I'm not going to link to it. It gives more particulars about the case that prompted all this. Apparently, what's at stake is that a judge is threatening to toss out convictions of people whose cases were affected by this guy not giving over information about a note stating that some original informant testimony was a lie. This prosecutor is in turn suing the Justice Department for delaying in getting him that information.

The end result is the fear that it could spill over to lots of other anti-terrorism prosecutions across the US.

Lose-Lose is right.

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2