FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Shoplifting

   
Author Topic: Shoplifting
Alexa
Member
Member # 6285

 - posted      Profile for Alexa           Edit/Delete Post 
Scenario:

A man walks into a store and buys a twinkie. On the way to his register he steals a magazine, stuffs it down his pants. He goes home and feels sorry. He decides to return, pay for the magazine, and accept any jail time he must pay.

Suddenly his older brother steps in and and offers to do the jail time.

What kinda *explicitive* would let his/her older brother do that? Why not accept all responisbility for your own actions and suffer the consequences?

Help me understand this.

[ March 18, 2004, 10:00 PM: Message edited by: Alexa ]

Posts: 1034 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Xavier
Member
Member # 405

 - posted      Profile for Xavier   Email Xavier         Edit/Delete Post 
Did this actually happen? Makes no sense to me.

The better question is why would the brother offer to take the jail time? and why go back to the store in the first place?

[ March 18, 2004, 09:54 PM: Message edited by: Xavier ]

Posts: 5656 | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ClaudiaTherese
Member
Member # 923

 - posted      Profile for ClaudiaTherese           Edit/Delete Post 
Alexa, welcome to Hatrack. [Smile]

Is this something that actually happened? I'd be skeptical of whomever told you about it, since I can't imagine a jail sentence for stealing a magazine.

How old were these siblings?

What is your relationship to this? (a story you heard, the topic of a school paper you are writing, etc)

[Happy to be deleted!]

[ March 18, 2004, 10:04 PM: Message edited by: ClaudiaTherese ]

Posts: 14017 | Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ludosti
Member
Member # 1772

 - posted      Profile for ludosti   Email ludosti         Edit/Delete Post 
I think Alexa is using this analogy in reference to Christian belief that Jesus "paid the price" for mankind's sins.....

Do I win a twinky?

[ March 18, 2004, 09:59 PM: Message edited by: ludosti ]

Posts: 5879 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Alexa
Member
Member # 6285

 - posted      Profile for Alexa           Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you for the reminder, and I apologize for the cursing. I have since edited my original post.
Posts: 1034 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ClaudiaTherese
Member
Member # 923

 - posted      Profile for ClaudiaTherese           Edit/Delete Post 
No worries. (Thanks for the quick edit!)

Ah ... so, you have questions about the philosophical basis of Christianity, then? Makes more sense.

You're likely to get a lot of takers for the conversation. Hope you find some answers. [Smile]

Posts: 14017 | Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Alexa
Member
Member # 6285

 - posted      Profile for Alexa           Edit/Delete Post 
I do too. Since the atonement is central to Christianity, it behooves me to understand it better. But no matter how much I appreciate the Savior, I keep wondering why I can't pay for my own sins.
Posts: 1034 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ludosti
Member
Member # 1772

 - posted      Profile for ludosti   Email ludosti         Edit/Delete Post 
Here's some of my own thoughts:

We all sin. By sinning we separate ourselves from God (we make ourselves "unclean" and nothing that is unclean can be with God). Nothing we can/could ever do can get us "clean" again - to the point where we *deserve* to be back in God's presence.

Now, I don't completely understand why this next part is the case, but I believe it to be so: God had known that we would need a Savior - someone to save us by doing for us that which we could not do ourselves - so He sent His most precious Son, Jesus, to earth to be our Savior. By some miraculous means, Jesus was able to suffer every ache and pain that every human being will every suffer. He suffered all the anguish caused of every sin that ever had been or ever would be committed. Somehow, he was able to "pay the price" of all our sins and, if we accept Him as our Savior (and do what he asks of us in return for his paying our debt), His sacrifice makes us "clean" again. Now, like I said up above, I don't know why or how this works. But, it is my sincere belief and hope that it is the case. I have done many things in my life that I am not proud of - things that were wrong, things that were sins in the eyes of God. I have felt like those things were "stains" on my soul, as it were. Regardless of what I did, how sorry I was, never repeating them again, etc. they still happened. I knew they happened and God knew they happened. But, I have faith that, when I have done all I can do to forsake my sins, Jesus' sacrifice can somehow clean my soul of that stain so that God and I can forget it was ever there. But it does make me ashamed and causes me pain to know that things that I have done and things that I continue to do caused my older brother to suffer beyong that which I can imagine. I cannot understand how He could do what He did. I cannot understand the amount of love He must have had (and still has) to do something like that.

[ March 18, 2004, 10:26 PM: Message edited by: ludosti ]

Posts: 5879 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ClaudiaTherese
Member
Member # 923

 - posted      Profile for ClaudiaTherese           Edit/Delete Post 
I don't mean to derail your thread, Alexa, but I found this fascinating:

quote:
Some people say that adam had to choose between 2 evils..disobey God and not have kids, or disobey God and get kicked out of the garden.

I don't see it that way. I think God often gives us 2 contrary commandments to see how we will choose.

Ie. Garden of Eden
Ie. When Jesus commands his disciples to leave their families to join him (otherwise they are not worthy). That seems at odds with believing in Jesus to stay with your family.

We are forced to choose, I think, so we can learn about consequences and what we believe. It is not a choice betweeen two evils, but two goods.

A leader MUST deal with limited resources and unlimited demand, the process of making choices shapes character. Pleasing everyone is not the criteria of a moral person in my mind. [emphasis added]

I'd never considered this interpretation, and I wondered if the theme of personal responsibility you raise in this thread forms the basis for how you view the world.

Is this why you find external atonement troubling (that is, is it because you see it as diminishing what is of central value to a a human life)?

*fascinated

Posts: 14017 | Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Alexa
Member
Member # 6285

 - posted      Profile for Alexa           Edit/Delete Post 
Claudia,

I must say I am flattered. To have someone think about your posts, well, it makes me feel good. But you go one step further and made a correct analysis of the foundation of my world view.

As a mormon, I am very grateful for the savior. MY gratitude is rooted in Him subjecting himself to understand my sins. I believe suffering can lead to compassion and understanding. In fact, the highest form of compassion has always been based in empathy. For me anyways.

So here I am weeping in the Passion of the Christ, and yet, I have never felt I remorse for my sins. By remorse, I mean the feeling of driving the nails in the Messiah's hands or feeling like I am offending God.

I have felt remorse and made changes in my life, but besides the emotional support of the Christ, I don't feel guilty.

I take responsibility and accept my consequences. If I have to feel the pain of my consequences that the D&C talks about (blood and pores), well, I welcome that moment to purify myself.

That being said, I don't understand the Atonement at it's core level--having someone else vicariously pay for my actions. It feels mean spirited to me.

Posts: 1034 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ClaudiaTherese
Member
Member # 923

 - posted      Profile for ClaudiaTherese           Edit/Delete Post 
Alexa, I look forward to seeing you puzzle through this. I wish I had answers, but I don't.
Posts: 14017 | Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dagonee
Member
Member # 5818

 - posted      Profile for Dagonee           Edit/Delete Post 
I think part of the problem with regards to understanding the Atonement is that we can only speak of it in imperfect metaphors. The atonement is not merely "Jesus being punished for our sins." It stems from the Incarnation, which is God becoming human so as to be able to serve as a mediator to make us one with God again.

There are many different theories as to the exact mechanism of the Atonement, even within individual denominations. Here's a link that explains several Catholic views on the subject.

quote:
It was by this inward sacrifice of obedience unto death, by this perfect love with which He laid down his life for His friends, that Christ paid the debt to justice, and taught us by His example, and drew all things to Himself; it was by this that He wrought our Atonement and Reconciliation with God, "making peace through the blood of His Cross".
This touches on most of the important aspects of the atonement, including obedience, sacrifice, love, debt, and justice.

Dagonee

Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2