FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Arthur Question

   
Author Topic: Arthur Question
Book
Member
Member # 5500

 - posted      Profile for Book           Edit/Delete Post 
I've seen the ads for the new Arthur movie, and can't help but wonder at what I'm almost certain are extreme historical innaccuracies, and it galls me to see them write "THE TRUTH BEHIND THE LEGEND" when it's clear that all this is far from true.

What I'm asking about is something I read a while back, which is that Arthur is often confused with the Welsh legend of Macsen Wledig (I believe that's right), one of the many stories from the Mabigonion (I believe that's right, too, but who knows): the story of a Roman general who came to Wales, married a Welsh princess and then turned against the Romans. Here they seem to have mixed the two. Is this right? I mean, surely with all the money Bruckenheimer is fronting they could've done some research.

EDIT: Also, if they were really going for the historical accuracy of the damn thing, why would they throw Lancelot in there when everyone knows he never existed?

[ May 28, 2004, 02:53 PM: Message edited by: Book ]

Posts: 2258 | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Space Opera
Member
Member # 6504

 - posted      Profile for Space Opera   Email Space Opera         Edit/Delete Post 
Ooooh, I've been spending too much time with the kiddos lately. I automatically assumed that the "Arthur" was the Arthur from the cartoon on PBS.

space opera

Posts: 2578 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jim-Me
Member
Member # 6426

 - posted      Profile for Jim-Me   Email Jim-Me         Edit/Delete Post 
I didn't get the name, but I was under the impression that many scholars thought Arthur *was* a particular Welsh Warrior-King that sought to unite, and for a time succeeded in uniting, the celtic clans and Roman Imperial government under one rule... <shrugs> dunno if this is relevant to your post, but it's what I heard [Big Grin]
Posts: 3846 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Farmgirl
Member
Member # 5567

 - posted      Profile for Farmgirl   Email Farmgirl         Edit/Delete Post 
I thought all of the legend of King Arthur was just that -- legend. There is historical basis?

(history wasn't my primary subject)

FG

Posts: 9538 | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jim-Me
Member
Member # 6426

 - posted      Profile for Jim-Me   Email Jim-Me         Edit/Delete Post 
Legends are often based on particular people... for example, there probably was a real Robin Hood... and Davy Crockett, Daniel Boone, John Henry and others were real men about whom legends have grown.

Sorry, FG, I didn't read that very closely and for some reason I thought you were talking about legends in general, not just Arthurian legend.

I have heard theories for the "factual basis" behind the legend of Arthur and this movie appears to be running with one of them.

[ May 28, 2004, 03:24 PM: Message edited by: Jim-Me ]

Posts: 3846 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I mean, surely with all the money Bruckenheimer is fronting they could've done some research.
Yeah, but look at the other crap that Bruckheimer puts out.
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jeniwren
Member
Member # 2002

 - posted      Profile for jeniwren   Email jeniwren         Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, that tagline bugged me too, just looking at the costumes. Keira Knightly is wearing nothing more than braided leather straps. The historical "accuracy" of that is hilarious.
Posts: 5948 | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jalapenoman
Member
Member # 6575

 - posted      Profile for Jalapenoman   Email Jalapenoman         Edit/Delete Post 
There is also a belief that Arthur was actually based on a naval captain, and not actually on a real king. There was some archaeological evidence for this that we studied in one of my university classes 20+ years ago (and I don't remember any of the details).

Now, if you want to know the real story of Arthur, just go to your local Blockbuster and rent of copy of Monty Python and the Holy Grail!

Posts: 279 | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mr.Gumby
Member
Member # 6303

 - posted      Profile for Mr.Gumby   Email Mr.Gumby         Edit/Delete Post 
[ROFL]
Posts: 312 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jim-Me
Member
Member # 6426

 - posted      Profile for Jim-Me   Email Jim-Me         Edit/Delete Post 
Somehow, Jeniwren, I think you and I disagree on whether making Keira Knightly wear "nothing but braided leather straps" is an "error", whether or not it's historically accurate [Wink]
Posts: 3846 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Noemon
Member
Member # 1115

 - posted      Profile for Noemon   Email Noemon         Edit/Delete Post 
Isn't she only 16 or something like that? I remember reading something saying that her mother pretty much baby sat her on the set of PotC.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sarahdipity
Member
Member # 3254

 - posted      Profile for sarahdipity   Email sarahdipity         Edit/Delete Post 
I actually took a whole class on Arthurian ledgend. Like a lot of ledgends the Arthur tales as we know of them are actually probably the conglomeration of a bunch of different people's actions. However there is archelogical evidence to show that for a period of time after the Romans left that there was some type of orderly peace that existed. I can't remember all the details though.

As for the tag-line. Well I mean no one can really claim to know the *truth* behind the Arthurian ledgend. Unless of course they've built a time machine in which case one would hope they'd start with other historical instances before this one. I suspect that they're just doing what Jim-Me said, just running with one of the ideas behind the ledgend. And as for all the stuff they're going to get wrong, well if it's a good movie I'll probably forgive them.

Posts: 872 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
It seems that Kiera Knightly is now nineteen, not sixteen. So she was probably a minor while filming Pirates.
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dan_raven
Member
Member # 3383

 - posted      Profile for Dan_raven   Email Dan_raven         Edit/Delete Post 
There are many possible historical people who some have claimed were the source for the Arthur legends.

Here is a small list of what real historians have to say.

All that the movie is doing is trying to say, "Hey Read history and you might find we don't need all this magic garbage."

Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jim-Me
Member
Member # 6426

 - posted      Profile for Jim-Me   Email Jim-Me         Edit/Delete Post 
I had no idea she was THAT young... [Angst]

at least she's not anymore...

Posts: 3846 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lupus
Member
Member # 6516

 - posted      Profile for Lupus   Email Lupus         Edit/Delete Post 
movies love to claim that old stories are true, as it gets people more excited about it.

Hell, disney claimed that Hildago was a true story when it was just the ramblings of a know liar. They even found that out themselves when they did fact checking...they just chose to ignore the fact that the race that he entered never exsisted...and the long distance horse racing community concidered the main character to be a joke.

Posts: 1901 | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Zamphyr
Member
Member # 6213

 - posted      Profile for Zamphyr           Edit/Delete Post 
My mind is totally out in left field because I kept rereading Book's first paragraph and thinking, "Dudley Moore's dead ! How are they making another one ??"
Posts: 349 | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
eslaine
Member
Member # 5433

 - posted      Profile for eslaine           Edit/Delete Post 
I thought it was a thread about a famous children's PBS cartoon.
Posts: 2506 | Registered: Jul 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Eaquae Legit
Member
Member # 3063

 - posted      Profile for Eaquae Legit   Email Eaquae Legit         Edit/Delete Post 
I wasn't aware that Macsen Wledig was in the Mabinogion. The Roman name for him is "Magnus Maximus," which seems a really silly name to me, and makes me think his story is mythological. But supposedly he was a Roman general in Britannia who decided to challenge the Emperor. He withdrew his troops, and was successful for a time but was eventually defeated. This would have been at least a hundred years before "Arthur," at my best guess. Something in the back of my mind is telling me Maximus was in the 300s, but I can't verify that so it may just be my imagination.

As for Arthus, this movie has me caught between hysterical laughter and tears. If they could have resisted billing it as "the HISTORICAL story," I'd go see it, munch my popcorn, and enjoy it as a fun movie. But by billing it as historical they've killed it in my mind. Oh well.

I'll go watch Monty Python now...

Posts: 2849 | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jerryst316
Member
Member # 5054

 - posted      Profile for Jerryst316   Email Jerryst316         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Somehow, Jeniwren, I think you and I disagree on whether making Keira Knightly wear "nothing but braided leather straps" is an "error", whether or not it's historically accurate
Well to be completely historically accurate, the group that knightley leads in the movie went to battle naked.

So I think you really want them to be historically accurate!

Posts: 107 | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Shan
Member
Member # 4550

 - posted      Profile for Shan           Edit/Delete Post 
Wow.

Can you imagine Brad Pitt as a Pict battling the hordes that scream and cry . . .

Posts: 5609 | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
amira tharani
Member
Member # 182

 - posted      Profile for amira tharani   Email amira tharani         Edit/Delete Post 
The only King Arthur stories I've read are the ones by Stephen Lawhead and the ones by T.H. White. Apparently the White ones are closer to Malory's Le Morte D'Arthur which I haven't read, but I preferred the Lawhead ones - they seemed more culturally authentic. For those who've read them and know the Arthur legends better than I do, how close are they to people's interpretations of the legends that sparked them off?
Posts: 1550 | Registered: Jun 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jeniwren
Member
Member # 2002

 - posted      Profile for jeniwren   Email jeniwren         Edit/Delete Post 
TAK, probably not. [Smile]

I confess, though, that it'll be a real detraction for me if the movie is taking itself seriously, and yet makes no effort to be reasonably accurate on the costumes. One of my favorite medieval-style movies is "First Knight", solely because the costuming in it is the worst I've ever seen. When I saw it in the theater, I was rolling with laughter -- literally. I suspect that this was the beginning of the end of my first marriage, as we were divorced shortly after seeing the movie together. Poor Sean Connery looks like he's doubling as a couch in most of the scenes. At least, however, "First Knight" doesn't have pretensions to accuracy on any level, and so may be considered comic. "Arthur", with a tagline purporting historical accuracy, figuring that the costuming was simply for comic relief (or other purposes [Wink] ) might be difficult for me to reach.

Posts: 5948 | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JonnyNotSoBravo
Member
Member # 5715

 - posted      Profile for JonnyNotSoBravo   Email JonnyNotSoBravo         Edit/Delete Post 
I think Mary Stewart talks about the Arthurian legend's source in the introduction to one or more of her Merlin series books(The Crystal Cave, The Hollow Hills, The Last Enchantment and The Wicked Day)...

[ May 29, 2004, 04:01 PM: Message edited by: JonnyNotSoBravo ]

Posts: 1423 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2