FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Thuggery & drug pushers

   
Author Topic: Thuggery & drug pushers
aspectre
Member
Member # 2222

 - posted      Profile for aspectre           Edit/Delete Post 
Should the law be abused as extortion on parents to dose their kids with psycho-active drugs to please quacks anxious to please the drug companies' desire to make ever greater profits.
Posts: 8501 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Icarus
Member
Member # 3162

 - posted      Profile for Icarus   Email Icarus         Edit/Delete Post 
Wow. Sickening in both cases. Barring some massive other side of the story, charging a parent with child neglect for taking their kid off of Ritalin . . . well, I can't find the words. Mind boggling. Scary. Orwellian, even.
Posts: 13680 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ClaudiaTherese
Member
Member # 923

 - posted      Profile for ClaudiaTherese           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
John Francis, a detective for the Rio Rancho Department of Public Safety, said that Taylor was not threatened but told KOAT-TV that parents could be charged in situations like his.

"People can be charged with child abuse, child neglect or various other crimes involving a child," he said.

I can see why people can be charged with child abuse and/or neglect for taking their children off some medications on their own and against medical advice. I don't see why this would be the case for Ritalin.

I'd like to see more information about what is actually going on in this case. We know the father states that he was threatened if he did this (and he may well have been threatened, or he may have misunderstood, or who knows?), but at this point the officials are "continuing to monitor" the case. That does seem appropriate.

Regarding the second article, such lies are indeed abominable. In fact, I can't believe that my colleagues will take even free pens and pencils, much less money and free trips, from drug company representatives. Some do, though, and they think nothing of it, almost as if it were a joke or a game. However, the conflict of interest is astronomical.

Still, beware of reading too much into the phrasing of "off-label" or "unapproved" use. Much of standard of care prescribing involves "off-label" use, and this may be entirely appropriate practice. For example, one anti-allergy drug touts itself as being the only one "approved" for both indoor and outdoor allergies. This is a reflection of the parenting company's gamble on the payoff from investing in extra studies, not a reflection of the actual effectiveness of the various drugs (as the physiological mechanism of "indoor" and "outdoor" allergies is exactly the same).

Posts: 14017 | Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2