FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Questioning of Commanders Allowed in Abu Ghraib Trial

   
Author Topic: Questioning of Commanders Allowed in Abu Ghraib Trial
Dagonee
Member
Member # 5818

 - posted      Profile for Dagonee           Edit/Delete Post 
Breaking News: Army Judge Allows Defense Request, Rules Prison Is a Crime Scene

quote:
The order affectively compels Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the top U.S. general in Iraq, and Lt. Gen. Thomas Metz, the second-ranking commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, and their subordinates to participate in a deposition with defense attorneys and Army prosecutors unless they invoke their rights against self-incrimination.

The judge, Col. James Pohl, rejected defense requests for memos between justice department attorneys, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and other Pentagon officials regarding the use of interrogation tactics.

"Quite frankly what they do in Washington, D.C., you have to connect it," Pohl said.

Pohl also ordered that the Abu Ghraib prison, where the abuse occurred, be preserved as a crime scene, and he rejected defense requests to move the proceedings out of Iraq.


Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sndrake
Member
Member # 4941

 - posted      Profile for sndrake   Email sndrake         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The order affectively compels Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez,
Hah! Thought so. They rushed this out and did a sloppy edit job. That's why the original article has the word "affectively" instead of "effectively."

Apparently someone at the Post finally noticed, too. It's been fixed. [Wink]

Posts: 4344 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dagonee
Member
Member # 5818

 - posted      Profile for Dagonee           Edit/Delete Post 
When I posted it was "breaking news," so they likely rushed it.

This is significant. A lot of crimes go unprosecuted because of whom the defense could call and compel testimony from. With the publicity around this, dismissal or giving a plea isn't really an option, so he's going to have to testify under oath.

I'm not sure what 5th amendment right to remain silence he has in military court, either. Should be interesting.

Dagonee

Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2