FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Infinity Debates - Papa Moose? Hobbes? Math geeks?

   
Author Topic: Infinity Debates - Papa Moose? Hobbes? Math geeks?
imogen
Member
Member # 5485

 - posted      Profile for imogen   Email imogen         Edit/Delete Post 
In his very sweet thread on Hobbes' and Annie's 1 year anniversary, Hobbes said

quote:
Contrary to popular opinion, infinity is not an actual number, it is the concept of a number. A true number can never be infinite, because a true number has a defined value, and as soon at is defined it is finite, it does not extend past all other possible numbers. When dealing with infinity the word is often used to mean the concept of forever, but in math, the best way of representing it in an equation, to obtain a meaningful result one must use limits.

lim x-> infinity, and then use x where you want infinity to be. You treat x as a number that approaches infinity; due to not being a number itself, infinity can not actually be reached, but “approaching” means “if it ever did reach that illustrious number, this would be it”. A very handy concept, one used frequently in math.

a definition which Pop described as "limited".

So what is a proper (unlimited [Smile] ) definition of infinity?

As a number I guess you can simply define it as 1/0 (or x/0 for that matter).

Posts: 4393 | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Boris
Member
Member # 6935

 - posted      Profile for Boris   Email Boris         Edit/Delete Post 
I thought that was an imaginary number...Or am I thinking of something else? (I'm an English/Computer geek, not a math geek)
Posts: 3003 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
imogen
Member
Member # 5485

 - posted      Profile for imogen   Email imogen         Edit/Delete Post 
Naw, imaginary numbers are the square roots of negatives and are represented by i.
Posts: 4393 | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MEC
Member
Member # 2968

 - posted      Profile for MEC   Email MEC         Edit/Delete Post 
imaginary number = i = (-1)^1/2

you cannot put 0 in the denominator. so it would be the limit of 1/x as x approches 0.

Posts: 2489 | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Hobbes
Member
Member # 433

 - posted      Profile for Hobbes   Email Hobbes         Edit/Delete Post 
Well actually, techinically, infinity can be treated as a number, it's just very difficult to deal with in an equation. An example:

(x^2+2x)/(4x^2-54x+2)

Where x is infinity. What does that equal? The only way to tell is to put a limit on it, as x approaches infinity. See, x^2 is a bigger inifinity than x, so just using the "number" infinity is insufficent, how big is the infinity? In this case, the answer is actually 1/4 if you're curious, but I'm not going to venture to far into limit theory.

Anyways, yes, Papa is right, and I'm sure when he sees this he'll give you a much more detailed explenation, since he's like 90 bajillion times smarter than I am (why do you think we call him Papa? [Wink] ) but for now, that's my input.

Hobbes [Smile]

Posts: 10602 | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Hobbes
Member
Member # 433

 - posted      Profile for Hobbes   Email Hobbes         Edit/Delete Post 
Ohh, and something to keep in mind, limits aren't the actual number. So this:

lim y-> infinity lim x->0 x^(y) is very different than 0^inifinty. The latter would be 0, since zero to any number is always zero, but the former isn't 0, since x is only approaching zero, it isn't actually zero.

Hobbes [Smile]

Posts: 10602 | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
The best example I ever came up with to explain this to someone:

The number of natural numbers is infinite.
The number of whole numbers is one larger than the number of natural numbers.
The number of integers is two times the number of natural numbers, plus one.
The number of real numbers, as there are an infinite number of fractions between each integer, is the square of the number of integers.

So "infinity," while useful as a concept, cannot be said to be a value.

Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Hobbes
Member
Member # 433

 - posted      Profile for Hobbes   Email Hobbes         Edit/Delete Post 
As a side note, all the number sets Tom listed are the same size of infinitey, but all real numbers is a larger infinitey than any of those.

Hobbes [Smile]

Posts: 10602 | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mike
Member
Member # 55

 - posted      Profile for Mike   Email Mike         Edit/Delete Post 
Tom:

quote:
The number of real numbers, as there are an infinite number of fractions between each integer, is the square of the number of integers.
You mean the rational numbers, yes? those that can be written as p/q, with p and q both integers? There are more real numbers than rational numbers, in the sense that you can't put the reals and rationals in a one-to-one correspondance. Which, incidentally, you can with the rationals and the naturals. One such mapping is:

  • 1 -> 0
  • 2 -> 1
  • 3 -> -1
  • 4 -> 2
  • 5 -> -2
  • 6 -> 1/2
  • 7 -> -1/2
  • 8 -> 3
  • 9 -> -3
  • 10 -> 1/3
  • 11 -> -1/3
  • 12 -> 4
  • 13 -> -4
  • 14 -> 3/2
  • 15 -> -3/2
  • 16 -> 2/3
  • 17 -> -2/3
  • 18 -> 1/4
  • 19 -> -1/4
  • ...
A proof of why this works is left as an exercise for the reader. [Big Grin]
A set is called countable if such a one-to-one correspondance exists. The rationals are countable, as are the gaussian integers. Reals are not, nor are p-adic numbers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countable

As for whether infinity is a number, that is really a matter of definition. As are many things in math. But keep in mind that there are many kinds of infinities, and the kind you mean when talking about limits is only one example.

Posts: 1810 | Registered: Jan 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
saxon75
Member
Member # 4589

 - posted      Profile for saxon75           Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, there are different types of infinities. Integers, natural numbers, and whole numbers are countable infinities. Real numbers and (I think) rational numbers are uncountable infinities.

I think I remember hearing or reading somewhere that there are specific orders of infinity, but I never learned what they are.

[Edit: You all should pay attention to that smart Mike up there. This one down here doesn't know what he's talking about.]

[ October 22, 2004, 11:20 AM: Message edited by: saxon75 ]

Posts: 4534 | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mike
Member
Member # 55

 - posted      Profile for Mike   Email Mike         Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks, saxon. [Blushing]

If I had gone to the trouble of actually reading the link I posted, I wouldn't have bothered to write out that list. But the link might be a little too dense for some.

Posts: 1810 | Registered: Jan 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2