FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Another Step Forward for James Webb Space Telescope

   
Author Topic: Another Step Forward for James Webb Space Telescope
Jay
Member
Member # 5786

 - posted      Profile for Jay   Email Jay         Edit/Delete Post 
A number of you have expressed interest in the NASA JWST project that I’m on and asked to be kept in the loop with anything. Just got this email today with this link included. Sort of an interesting article about the grinding and polishing of the mirrors. I don’t really have anything to do with this part of it since we’re verification of software, but still thought you might find this enjoyable. Happy Surfing.

Opening of Tinsley's New Large Optics Manufacturing Facility Marks Another Step Forward for James Webb Space Telescope

Posts: 2845 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jay
Member
Member # 5786

 - posted      Profile for Jay   Email Jay         Edit/Delete Post 
So is it nobody wanted to see this or is everyone mad at me?
Posts: 2845 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Noemon
Member
Member # 1115

 - posted      Profile for Noemon   Email Noemon         Edit/Delete Post 
Just didn't see it, myself. Glad to see the project is advancing.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bokonon
Member
Member # 480

 - posted      Profile for Bokonon           Edit/Delete Post 
Let's hope those mirrors don't suffer a similar defect as Hubble [Wink]

-Bok

[ April 05, 2005, 04:11 PM: Message edited by: Bokonon ]

Posts: 7021 | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Glenn Arnold
Member
Member # 3192

 - posted      Profile for Glenn Arnold   Email Glenn Arnold         Edit/Delete Post 
Hubble suffered from military contract syndrome. Perkin-Elmer offered a higher bid, but without testing the two mirrors together (they claimed that gravity would deform the mirrors and make any test invalid).

I think it was Kodak that gave a lower bid including testing the mirrors as a unit, but were turned down. I wonder why?

Posts: 3735 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Destineer
Member
Member # 821

 - posted      Profile for Destineer           Edit/Delete Post 
Good deal! Looks like a great project.
Posts: 4600 | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2