FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Anuther Grammer Qwestion

   
Author Topic: Anuther Grammer Qwestion
BunnV
Member
Member # 6816

 - posted      Profile for BunnV   Email BunnV         Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe a grammar savant can help me figure this out. I have a question about the use of past tenses of "show." Which of these are correct or incorrect or can they all be used interchangeably?

"You have shown me this."
"You had shown me this."
"You have showed me this."
"You had showed me this."

And if there is a rule for the word "show" does that same rule apply for the past tenses of "shine"? (shone and shined)

Posts: 326 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Chungwa
Member
Member # 6421

 - posted      Profile for Chungwa   Email Chungwa         Edit/Delete Post 
I may be wrong, but I'd go for:

"You have shown me this."

"John had shown me this."

"Bill showed me this."


You'll certainly want to wait for someone with more knowledge to reply, though.

Posts: 367 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kojabu
Member
Member # 8042

 - posted      Profile for kojabu           Edit/Delete Post 
One of those makes me quiver. But I'm not actually sure which, I keep changing my mind.
Posts: 2867 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Boris
Member
Member # 6935

 - posted      Profile for Boris   Email Boris         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by kojabu:
One of those makes me quiver. But I'm not actually sure which, I keep changing my mind.

That's because all of the sentences are incorrect. They use variations of "show" correctly, but this is what they have to look like to be grammatically correct.

"You have shown this to me"
"John has shown this to me"
"You will show this to me"
"Bill showed this to me"

That "to" really has to be in there to make it grammatical.

edit: Sorry about being vague. I can't remember the exact rule that says that. Basically, you have two nouns in the sentence. "This" and "Me". There has to be something there to seperate the two nouns.

Posts: 3003 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Boon
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Look here, a little less than halfway down.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Boris
Member
Member # 6935

 - posted      Profile for Boris   Email Boris         Edit/Delete Post 
Heh, I love the Present Continuous section. It's like Jamaican slang [Smile]

"I be showing you, mon!"

Posts: 3003 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dante
Member
Member # 1106

 - posted      Profile for Dante           Edit/Delete Post 
"You show me this."

"You showed me this."

"You have shown me this."

You don't need a "to." In the above phrases, "this" is the direct object and "me" is the indirect object. It doesn't require a preposition and works fine as is.

Posts: 1068 | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
BunnV: Showed is the correct simple past form, and both showed and shown are correct as past participles. Thus, all your example sentences are correct. Dante is also correct in saying that you don't need to phrase it like "this to me." Indirect objects can go with a to, but they don't have to.
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dante
Member
Member # 1106

 - posted      Profile for Dante           Edit/Delete Post 
While both "showed" and "shown" are okay, the OED points out that
quote:
for the pa. pple. shown is now the usual form
Plus, "showed" sounds kind of clunky as a past participle.
Posts: 1068 | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
This is also true.
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tante Shvester
Member
Member # 8202

 - posted      Profile for Tante Shvester   Email Tante Shvester         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Present Continuous_______Past Continuous
I be showing______________I were showing

Do native speakers ever use this?
Posts: 10397 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
Speakers of black English use the first one, but I've never heard the second one. Of course, I'm not an expert on black English.
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Annie
Member
Member # 295

 - posted      Profile for Annie   Email Annie         Edit/Delete Post 
It's also important to point out that "have shown" is a totally different tense than "had shown."
Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
I think BunnV was asking which ones were correct, the first two or the last two. I also forgot to point out that the same thing holds true with shined and shone: both are correct, but there may be regional differences in usage.
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tatiana
Member
Member # 6776

 - posted      Profile for Tatiana   Email Tatiana         Edit/Delete Post 
BunnV, Jon Boy's always right about these things, about grammar questions. And since he confirms exactly what I said in all particulars, my already high confidence in him is now even higher. [Wink]
Posts: 6246 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jonathan Howard
Member
Member # 6934

 - posted      Profile for Jonathan Howard   Email Jonathan Howard         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
both showed and shown are correct as past participles.
I always use "shown". Since when is "showed" past participle?
Posts: 2978 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dagonee
Member
Member # 5818

 - posted      Profile for Dagonee           Edit/Delete Post 
Since pretty much forever? It's divided usage. In fact, Bartleby uses it as an example of divided usage for past participles.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Tatiana:
BunnV, Jon Boy's always right about these things, about grammar questions. And since he confirms exactly what I said in all particulars, my already high confidence in him is now even higher. [Wink]

*beams*

Jonathan: You have much to learn, my young padawan.

Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BunnV
Member
Member # 6816

 - posted      Profile for BunnV   Email BunnV         Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for having shown me these rules you guys! Really appreciate it. [Big Grin]

(Hmm, I hope I used it right that time.)

::doubts himself::

Posts: 326 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jon Boy
Member
Member # 4284

 - posted      Profile for Jon Boy           Edit/Delete Post 
For questions like this, it never hurts to check a dictionary. If you go to www.m-w.com and look up a word, you'll see a list of inflected forms. The first is the simple past ("I showed"), the second is the past participle ("I have shown"), and the last is the present participle ("I am showing"). When there's more than one option, they list the most common one first. This is what it looks like:
quote:
showed \shod\; shown \shon \; or showed; show·ing
The "or" there means that "showed" is an alternate form for the past participle. For shine, this is what you get:
quote:
shone \shon, especially Canadian and British shän \; or shined; shin·ing
For this one, it doesn't list separate simple past and past participle forms. This means they're the same, and there's also variation in both of them between shone and shined.
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2