posted
Eh, looks good enough to go see, if nothing else just because the other two really were freaking hiiilarious. This one will have to be really bad to ruin the legacy of the other two, and it doesn't look all that bad. We shall see though.
Posts: 2827 | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The first two were very good. A sequel that's the equal of the first without making a significant change is a pretty impressive achievement in my view.
Anymore without significant change to the plot? Useless! The second one stretched credibility. But it was good enough to pull it of successfully. It was the end, after all, the second big ending, and two is enough.
But, this being Hollywood, there is a lot of money at stake. I understand and thus don't find it loathesome anymore, actually. They're spending a LOT of money to make a movie, and if the movie fails they don't get it back. It's gone, thrown away, and movies these days cost a lot of money.
So, a sequel to a popular movie is a good bet to them, because they can make money from all the "I know nothing about its quality, but I loved the previous one!" crowd.
Thus why we get, like, 2,000 Jason movies.
Posts: 1577 | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm only saddened by the fact that I know they already have two more in the pipeline...and a Puss in Boots spinoff....and a television show....
I mean for the love of God, let it go out in style!
I'm going to go see it, because if nothing else I think it will entertain ment for two hours, but I think this will be the last one I see in theater.
Posts: 21898 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
