posted
Huh. I'll ask my brother once hes back on MSN. The first third of it (all I could listen to before my computer went snoopy loopy on me) the gist of the oppositions argument I think was through a Libertarian argument of rights. And makes the assumption that a democratic government "always" assures that the rights of all citizens are protected at all times. Something that is patently false by historical precedent.
IP: Logged |
Blayne Bradley
unregistered
posted
http://mcgilldu.mypodcast.com/ Here's the page my brother linked me but I don't see a transcript I will enquire once hes online.
IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
