Hatrack River
Home   |   About Orson Scott Card   |   News & Reviews   |   OSC Library   |   Forums   |   Contact   |   Links
Research Area   |   Writing Lessons   |   Writers Workshops   |   OSC at SVU   |   Calendar   |   Store
E-mail this page
Hatrack River Forum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » GOP Once again hold normal governance hostage

Author Topic: GOP Once again hold normal governance hostage
Elison R. Salazar
Member # 8565

 - posted      Profile for Elison R. Salazar   Email Elison R. Salazar         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 

Because apparently they want sanctions on Iran to torpedo Obama's foreign policy achievements.

WASHINGTON — The prospects for an election-year Senate bill aimed at beefing up benefits for America's veterans are caught in the dispute over whether to impose sanctions on Iran.

Democrats resumed trying to push legislation through the Senate on Wednesday that would allow more veterans to get treatment at Veterans Affairs Department facilities, expand dental care and fertility treatment, and bolster education and job-training benefits. A showdown vote was expected Thursday.

Helping veterans is popular with both parties. But Republicans are demanding a vote on an amendment that would reduce the costs of the $21 billion legislation — and also impose fresh sanctions on Iran if ongoing negotiations over curbing that country's nuclear program fail.

President Barack Obama opposes those sanctions, saying international talks should be given a chance to succeed. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has blocked attempts to hold a vote on the sanctions — which mirrors earlier bipartisan legislation that garnered 59 co-sponsors and had the potential to pass the chamber and embarrass Obama.

If Reid denies Republicans a vote on the amendments, GOP senators may use procedural moves to block the veterans measure from reaching final passage.

Harsh words from both sides Wednesday made that outcome seem increasingly likely — a day after senators voted 99-0 to allow debate on the legislation to begin.

Reid said the GOP push to include Iran sanctions in the veterans bill was "obstruction at its best" and added, "Republicans obviously have no intent of doing anything for the veterans."

Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said it would be "extremely disrespectful" to veterans to use the legislation "as nothing more than a political pawn for other issues."

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said attaching the Iran sanctions to the veterans bill would enhance the prospects for sanctions and added, "There is no excuse for muzzling the Congress on an issue of this importance to our own national security" and the security of other countries.

"If he doesn't allow Republican amendments, I think the path forward is probably going to kill the bill," Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina, top Republican on the Veterans committee, said of Reid.

Posts: 12398 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Member # 12181

 - posted      Profile for capaxinfiniti           Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Why is Reid blocking a vote on the sanctions? Let both votes happen and move on...
Posts: 532 | Registered: Sep 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Why is Reid blocking a vote on the sanctions?
Because he doesn't want to let a bunch of idiots undermine our foreign policy, probably.
Posts: 36838 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Member # 480

 - posted      Profile for Bokonon           Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
He isn't, the GOP is using it to poison pill other votes that would otherwise pass (veteran's benefits).

The sanctions bill's chances were pretty much killed a few weeks ago, when it turned out there were not enough votes to end any potential filibuster of it, as well as to make it veto-proof (Obama was no doubt going to veto a bill he believes would destroy any positive outcomes from the current diplomacy [EDIT: which is an understandable position for him to take, even if you believe it wrong]).


Posts: 6870 | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator

Quick Reply

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
UBB Code™ Images not permitted.
Instant Graemlins

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2