posted
Just want some comments. This is a 13,000 word story. Fantasy genre. This is the very beggining.
"Blind, mute...can't even play an instrument...no wonder you sold him for so cheap! What use can he be!"
This mistress was a fiery one and the way she wringled her silken hankerchief, it might as well have been the bald, stuttering, slave merchant's neck.
"Now, now, My Lady, we...we already signed the contract and--"
"Spitting into eachother's hands' is not a legal document!" She screeched, gathering the attention of serveral beggars who had been figting over the carcass of a dead rat.
The man waved his hand through the air, dismissing her words, "You say whore, I say lover--it's all the same. Besides," the merchant pointed over to the two scrawny figures who had gone back to wrestling in the green sludge and grinned, "we had witnesses."
[This message has been edited by M.D. Westbrook (edited November 09, 2005).]
[This message has been edited by Kathleen Dalton Woodbury (edited November 09, 2005).]
"Sold him for so cheap" - should either be "sold him so cheap" (strictly, it should be "cheaply" in that instance, but people don't always distinguish adverbs and adjectives in dialogue), or "sold him for so cheap a price".
"What use can he be!" should be "What use can he be?"
Wringled is not a word. I assumed you may mean "wrung", which is the past tense of "wring".
"Serveral" is spelt (or spelled...) "several".
That said; there's colour here, and a kind of morbid delight in squalor, that has a certain promise. But I think you either need to proofread your piece thoroughly before asking for readers, or else polish up your grammar and spelling basics. Were I an editor, there's no way I'd read on any further.
[This message has been edited by tchernabyelo (edited November 09, 2005).]
posted
The mood is great: the squalor and the humor.
We need to know whose POV we're in, immediately.
About legal document: if we're in a medeival setting, literacy was rare enough that it would not be reasonable to expect non-specialists to use documents for anything.
posted
I think POV is the only issue I see with this piece. Like wbriggs said, let us know right away whose head we're in. Otherwise it kind of feels like we're floating over it instead of experiencing it.
Edited to say: I forgot to say I like the mood too. You set the scene well.
[This message has been edited by pixydust (edited November 09, 2005).]
posted
I really like this opener. I imedialty want to know about the slave (does he have anythign to do with he story or not). I do agree that the i am lost on the POV but I would not have noticed if i wasnt told. ( Cause i am a dufus!)Still i would read more, infact i would love to.
[This message has been edited by W. G. Tryndale (edited November 10, 2005).]
posted
Looks good. I agree with many of the above points. The POV issue isn't so bad as long as you establish it soon. Keep it up.
Posts: 17 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The blind mute is the first character introduced here. I'd like some sense of who/what he is. Just a single line of description inserted into the line of the mistress's dialogue? Tell me something about him. Otherwise he--being the subject of the entire discussion--is lost in the shuffle.
Posts: 1672 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |