Hatrack River Writers Workshop   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Writers Workshop » Forums » Open Discussions About Writing » The end of the short story

   
Author Topic: The end of the short story
pantros
Member
Member # 3237

 - posted      Profile for pantros   Email pantros         Edit/Delete Post 
I have always thought that a short story did not have to end with the last word written. I seem to get a lot people wanting to know what happens next even though my plot has closed.

Is this bad?


Posts: 370 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Silver3
Member
Member # 2174

 - posted      Profile for Silver3   Email Silver3         Edit/Delete Post 
Hum. Hard to say. Usually, yes. There's what you call "open-ended" stories in which it is up to the reader to decide what is going to happen to the character. But that ending has to bring some sense of resolution and be coherent with the rest of the story.
Example: a policeman investigates a murder. He solves it, but becomes so weary of seeing the dark side of human nature that he resigns from the forces.
This is open-ended in the sense that you don't know what he will do with his life. But he did solve the murder.
You could get away with his not solving the murder if you dropped lots of hints about humans not making sense, and the impossibility of establishing guilt.
I guess in the end, it boils down to an implicit promise you made to the reader in your first few lines (or pages for longer stuff). At the end, you have to deliver on that promise. If you promised a murder investigation, you have to solve it. If the focus of your story is on the relationship between the protag and her husband, you have no right to switch to an emotional ending about her long-lost son. That's cheating.
Most readers know when they've been cheated. Generally, it's at that point that they ask that question. You simply did not resolve enough for them.
My two cents.

[This message has been edited by Silver3 (edited November 03, 2005).]


Posts: 1075 | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pantros
Member
Member # 3237

 - posted      Profile for pantros   Email pantros         Edit/Delete Post 
No I specifically meant when the main plot had been completed.

For instance:

Character wants to get pregnant
At the end of the story the character gets pregnant.

Then people tell me that they wished they knew more about how she raises the kid.

[This message has been edited by pantros (edited November 03, 2005).]


Posts: 370 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Beth
Member
Member # 2192

 - posted      Profile for Beth   Email Beth         Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe you thought you were writing a story about a character who wants to get pregnant, but what came through to the reader were other issues that weren't resolved by the pregnancy story line. Maybe the way you wrote it brought up issues of a much larger story.

I dunno. Hard to say in the abstract.


Posts: 1750 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BuffySquirrel
Member
Member # 2780

 - posted      Profile for BuffySquirrel           Edit/Delete Post 
I think it's normal for a reader who's engaged with a character or a world to want to know more, even if a particular story has a satisfactory ending. Some fan fiction (although nowhere near all) is inspired by the question 'but what happened next?', and there are markets for sequels and prequels by other authors (viz the eternal Foundation and Dune series).
Posts: 245 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pantros
Member
Member # 3237

 - posted      Profile for pantros   Email pantros         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm of the mindset that the reader should be interested in the characters enough to want to know what happens next even when the storyline finishes. Any character with any depth will have other questions that people want answered.

Is it bad to create characters who are interesting enough that people want to know more about them than the writer can tell in the chosen venue?

From what Beth has said I wonder if there is a point where raising more questions than the story answers is a bad thing even when the major plot is resolved. Is it bad to leave these doors open when opening them is important to the setting but stepping through them is not required to resolve the plot?


Posts: 370 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Liadan
Member
Member # 2967

 - posted      Profile for Liadan   Email Liadan         Edit/Delete Post 
Then you're doing it right. Short stories are just that. Wrap up the main theme and leave the reader wanting a bit more.

As an editor of an online magazine, those are the ones I enjoy most. It's nice to tie up all loose ends, but not necessary.

Liadan


Posts: 18 | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pixydust
Member
Member # 2311

 - posted      Profile for pixydust   Email pixydust         Edit/Delete Post 
I think Beth may have hit the nail on the head. And I say: Don't open any doors that you don't close at the end. Especially if they have to do with character development. You don't want your reader to be unsatisfied, and I've learned the hard way that this is what happens. You're narrative may be awesome but they just have too many left over questions at the end to feel content. Tying up the biggest thread just isn't enough. You've got to get them all set straight--for the most part--at the end.

Keep in mind there are exceptions to every rule. This is just something I've discovered in my own writing over the years.


Posts: 811 | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pantros
Member
Member # 3237

 - posted      Profile for pantros   Email pantros         Edit/Delete Post 
Wow, just seeing the name 'Liadan' totally threw me. I have a character with that name in a series of fifteen or sixteen serial chapters that I wrote by request for my wife because she was dissatisfied with some of Laurel K Hamilton's work and wanted more/better.

Just an unusal (historical irish) name. But my Liadan is an elven assassin.

Sorry for the off topic

[This message has been edited by pantros (edited November 03, 2005).]


Posts: 370 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Beth
Member
Member # 2192

 - posted      Profile for Beth   Email Beth         Edit/Delete Post 
If your readers aren't satisfied with the story, then yeah, I'd say you're doing it wrong, if your objective is to write stories that satisfy your readers.
Posts: 1750 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2