Hatrack River Writers Workshop   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Writers Workshop » Forums » Open Discussions About Writing » the middle....

   
Author Topic: the middle....
Zero
Member
Member # 3619

 - posted      Profile for Zero           Edit/Delete Post 
No, this is not about a Jimmy Eat World song, I have a rare (for me rare) problem with my WIp. I'm literally stuck in the middle. That may not seem so different, except I have the first third and final third perfectly outlines, and I have a sketch of the critical ideas that must happen in the middle, but I don't know how to actualize them into explicit events. I'm sur emore time and thinking will solve this problem, but I am curious how many of you suffer from the same thing.

I feel like a pre-schooler who knows where point A and point B are but I'm too stupid to draw the line that connects them.


Posts: 2195 | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
annepin
Member
Member # 5952

 - posted      Profile for annepin   Email annepin         Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I do have this problem. In fact, I had a terrible time with this in my first book because I knew where the story started (protag and antag in mortal combat) and where it should end (protag and antag have a truce) and vaguely the concepts that would get them there, such as a growing respect for the other, expansion of world perspective, but how does one actually play out something like "expansion of world perspective"? I think this is the danger in thinking in terms of ideas, concepts, and themes--it's hard to translate them into human action.

My solution is to try to answer the question, "What's the shortest or simplest route between A and B?" And then I'll just start writing it, no matter how stupid or inane if feels. Usually enough starts sparking in my head to give me more ideas.

Another thing I try to keep in mind is something that I learned from a writing teacher a while back: In general scenes work best when one scene directly causes the following scene (I'm not saying this eloquently--essentially, they are causally linked, one following as the direct, and possibly only outcome of the previous one). So I go back to whatever is the last scene I outlined out and think, so now what happens? What will the characters do? For the time being, I don't worry about the more complex ideas or concepts, or even dramatic tension. I just try to role play the characters, what they are likely to do at this point. Usually that sparks something, too.

[This message has been edited by annepin (edited August 10, 2007).]


Posts: 2185 | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lehollis
Member
Member # 2883

 - posted      Profile for lehollis   Email lehollis         Edit/Delete Post 
The book Plot and Structure by James Scott Bell offers some useful advice on middles (among many other things, including beginnings and endings). I struggled with middles until I read it.

Middles are often about raising the stakes. They are about a struggle, a back and forth between protagonist and antagonist--it's important that they try. For the escalation of intensity and stakes (even if only internal conflict), they often follow an action-reaction-action pattern. I think of the middle as throwing stones at the character, complicating things, making life as rough as I can.

You know the goal, so think of what your lead is doing to reach that goal. Then think of what the opposition is doing to stop your lead. Then think of how the lead reacts to that, and what he will do after that.

I also ask myself: can the lead back out of the conflict? If so, I need to find a way to tie her into the conflict better.

Are the emotional stakes high enough? If not, the ending may not be satisfying or the setup may be weak. (No matter how hard she struggles to finish the Sudoku puzzle, we're not going to care unless there is some reason to care.)

Each scene should accomplish something. Either it's an action or a reaction, or it's a setup or a deepening. Setup and deepening, I think, are minor elements that can be worked into the larger action and reaction scenes.

I'm actually working on the middle of my WiP right now, so this has all been fresh on my mind. I'm glad you brought it up.


Posts: 696 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rick Norwood
Member
Member # 5604

 - posted      Profile for Rick Norwood   Email Rick Norwood         Edit/Delete Post 
Excellent advice. If it doesn't raise the stakes, then it isn't a middle, it's a digression. Watch how often published writers skip over the dull parts that beginners think they have to put in.

Anything worth writing about is worth developing in a dramatic scene with things happening that the characters care about. If the protagonist has a bad marriage, and you don't want to write about that, understand that the reader doesn't want to read about that, either. Then look what Orson Welles did with that in Citizen Kane.

One of my favorite examples is "If" by Lord Dunsany. It's a play, not a novel. In Act One, John meets Miralda on a train in England. Act Two opens, "John's tent in Al Shaldomir."


Posts: 557 | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
arriki
Member
Member # 3079

 - posted      Profile for arriki   Email arriki         Edit/Delete Post 
Normally the middle is where the reader spends the most time in a novel. It should be interesting, not something to be skipped over quickly.
Posts: 1580 | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2