Hatrack River Writers Workshop   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Writers Workshop » Forums » Open Discussions About Writing » flying creatures and suspension of disbelief

   
Author Topic: flying creatures and suspension of disbelief
annepin
Member
Member # 5952

 - posted      Profile for annepin   Email annepin         Edit/Delete Post 
I've got some flying creatures in a fantasy story I'm working on. There's no magic in their flight though there is magic elsewhere in the world (the rules of the magic currently do not allow the ability to fly). Of course, engineering flying creatures is tricky. While pterodactyls are speculated to be up to 200 lbs, they were skinny and small in comparison to their wing spans (up to 33 feet). Nor do I think that most people know this.

My creatures aren't all that skinny or light. So, would your skepticism on their abilities to fly pull you out of the story?


Posts: 2185 | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
InarticulateBabbler
Member
Member # 4849

 - posted      Profile for InarticulateBabbler   Email InarticulateBabbler         Edit/Delete Post 
If it's a fantasy, I'm already suspending my belief of the natural order of things. If you tell me there are fl;ying things, describe them, and use them as the characters would, I'm good. However, if you begin to explain why or how they could--unless it's relevant, or through a character's eyes that would naturally be thinking about that--it will not only make me wonder about the logistics, it will tear me out of the story.

Just write it, see if you feel it looks right afterwards. (Don't worry about it until someone points your fears out.)


Posts: 3687 | Registered: Jan 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rommel Fenrir Wolf II
Member
Member # 4199

 - posted      Profile for Rommel Fenrir Wolf II   Email Rommel Fenrir Wolf II         Edit/Delete Post 
Well how long are they? Can the people in your story ride them?
Or are they just flying creatures that have not been tamed?

RFW2nd


Posts: 856 | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tiergan
Member
Member # 7852

 - posted      Profile for Tiergan   Email Tiergan         Edit/Delete Post 
Nope.

In fantasy, it takes a lot, I mean a lot, for me to disbelieve if the story captures me. If a house got up and flew, yeah maybe, but a creature, no, not in the least.


Posts: 1168 | Registered: Mar 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jericho
Member
Member # 8073

 - posted      Profile for Jericho   Email Jericho         Edit/Delete Post 
I really liked the question and the concept of the limits of the laws of physics in a world where even magic has laws. I think you could get away with the 'willy suspension' angle. I also think you can engineer a world that would allow for your flying beasties. If gravity were less and/or the atmo lighter or maybe even some organic material that these creatures were made from that allowed for stronger and hollower bones or they could even produce helium or something. I think there are a lot of ways to make it work if it is important for you or the reader to have it work.
Posts: 47 | Registered: Jul 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TaleSpinner
Member
Member # 5638

 - posted      Profile for TaleSpinner   Email TaleSpinner         Edit/Delete Post 
We don't entirely understand how birds fly. Nor do we know how they find their way across thousands of miles when they migrate.

Until recently, we would not have believed craft of metal flying through the air. Even airships and balloons were a bit of a surprise to some.

I think that if flying is presented as a done deal, we'll accept it as long as it's consistent with the rest of the story. (It's totally daft, but who doesn't believe that Superman can fly, or that HP can play Quidditch on a broomstick?)

When I read fantasy I want to suspend my disbelief and will do so willingly provided the author doesn't give me a reason not to. Yes, that's a fragile thing, and it's part of the art IMHO.

Cheers,
Pat


Posts: 1796 | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bent Tree
Member
Member # 7777

 - posted      Profile for Bent Tree   Email Bent Tree         Edit/Delete Post 
*Rubs crystal ball*

I am seeing extends massive wings in your prose


Posts: 1888 | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tommose
Member
Member # 8058

 - posted      Profile for tommose   Email tommose         Edit/Delete Post 
Mathematically, a bumblebee cannot fly. There's no reason that the flying creatures in your world cannot be huge. Hollow bones, A fast flap cycle, deep wings, with more lift area...

If it's a fantasy world in the traditional non-technological world, the reason why would never come into question. They're big flying beasties is all. And good eating!

[This message has been edited by tommose (edited July 12, 2008).]


Posts: 60 | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, Superman started by being "able to leap tall buildings in a single bound." Flying came later...

I suppose it's one of man's oldest dreams to fly like the birds. But airplanes don't "fly like the birds" by any means.

I remember the late Poul Anderson came up with a forced-draft intake as a next-evolutionary step, and used that to produce massive (and intelligent) flying creatures. You gotta come up with something to provide the necessary energy...


Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Noele
Member
Member # 8081

 - posted      Profile for Noele   Email Noele         Edit/Delete Post 
I'd say as long as you do the research into flying creatures to get a good idea of the mechanics then you're good to go. It sounds like you've already done that or started it at least. As long as it wasn't something as big as a horse with wings as tiny as a bee, I'd believe it. Heck, I could potentially believe that if given the right context.
Posts: 26 | Registered: Jul 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
wetwilly
Member
Member # 1818

 - posted      Profile for wetwilly   Email wetwilly         Edit/Delete Post 
I've never heard of anybody dropping "The Hobbit" when they find out that Smaug can fly, and he's got to weigh a couple tons. I wouldn't worry about it. Giant flying creatures are a staple of fantasy, so I don't think they require an explanation. It's like space travel in a sci-fi book...it's just part of the genre and doesn't require plausibility or an explanation.
Posts: 1528 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tommose
Member
Member # 8058

 - posted      Profile for tommose   Email tommose         Edit/Delete Post 
Smaug could fly? What a ripoff!
Posts: 60 | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
halogen
Member
Member # 6494

 - posted      Profile for halogen   Email halogen         Edit/Delete Post 
Nah, I think the dragon concept has been beaten down to the point where the average person wont think twice about whether or not a two-ton lizard really should be able to fly. I wouldn't give it a second thought.

With that said it would be interesting to read a story that took some fact in with its fantasy.

That is to say, (using dragons as an example) perhaps the two-ton-lizard-with-wings isn't the best at flying, really more of a glider as opposed to all that swooping and twirling.

That or the lizard can fly at a young age and as it ages and increases in size the wings become less useful. The lizard could go through three stages; flying (the size of a dog), gliding (size of a horse), walking (size of an elephant). At the last stage the wings are old, useless appendages.

[This message has been edited by halogen (edited July 14, 2008).]


Posts: 207 | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jericho
Member
Member # 8073

 - posted      Profile for Jericho   Email Jericho         Edit/Delete Post 
Halogen, that is where I was. I was intrigued by the idea of there being limited magic and trying to make the rest conform to the physics of the world. I'd like to hear from annepin the intent.
Posts: 47 | Registered: Jul 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
annepin
Member
Member # 5952

 - posted      Profile for annepin   Email annepin         Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting spectrum of thoughts. Thanks to all who weighed in here.

My reason for asking is twofold. First, I'm sometimes amazed by the kinds of details that seem to bother people. They might believe in, say, FTL, but not in a weapon that could destroy an entire planet (this example is purely hypothetical! Any resemblance to real or actual opinions is unintentional).

The second reason is something close to what Jericho pointed out. I'm trying to create a "realistic" fantasy world, odd as that seems. The rules of magic i decided on don't allow for flying, so things who fly have to do so strictly on the rules of physics. I'm comfortable fudging the physics a bit, but I did want to try to make it as plausible as possible. So I was curious how people would interpret as plausible, give a fantasy setting where there is some ability to bend physics, but not entirely. There's a sort of spectrum of fantasy, I guess, and I wanted to investigate where the ability to fly, given wings, falls with people. If that makes any sense at all.


Posts: 2185 | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tommose
Member
Member # 8058

 - posted      Profile for tommose   Email tommose         Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, I think I need to reverse my opinion, based on the comments I've read, as well as some thought about the great fantasy stuff I've read.

If your rules for magic don't allow for the suspension of physical laws allowing the flight of non-aerodynamic bodies, then large non-aerodynamic creatures shouldn't be able to fly.

When I think about the great fantasy pieces I've read, there's been consistency and realism. If you want a believable setting, then there shouldn't be "exceptions" provided for literary fancy or convenience.

A situation where nobody flies, except for creature / character / object X leads to the big "huh" moment that can throw off the reader. Any time that you choose to ignore the rules of physics, there should be some explanation of how this is done, not necessarily written, but at least in your mind.

Tom


Posts: 60 | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Doc Brown
Member
Member # 1118

 - posted      Profile for Doc Brown   Email Doc Brown         Edit/Delete Post 
There are still ways to make your creature fly. Heavier than air flight requires a bunch of energy (muscles) and a way to direct the energy (aerodynamics).

Give any creature powerful enough muscles and it can fly. Even a human could fly by flapping his/her arms, if the arms have tough enough skin & bones, and the muscles have enough power.

Normal metabolic muscles probably cannot provide that much power. In that case you can give your creature a nuclear power source. Maybe it eats uranium.


Posts: 976 | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rstegman
Member
Member # 3233

 - posted      Profile for rstegman   Email rstegman         Edit/Delete Post 
one could use magic to modify physics

magic could make bones stronger so they can br lighter.

magic could make the body more energy efficient.

magic provide more energy or power than physics normally possible.

combine these and one could have a flying T-Rex with the wings of a Sesna plane


Posts: 1008 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tommose
Member
Member # 8058

 - posted      Profile for tommose   Email tommose         Edit/Delete Post 
Now, that's interesting. With those rules, while you cannot directly use magic to create flight, you can use magic to alter individual physical properties in order to allow a creature to fly.

Using those rules, one could not only have "a flying T-Rex with the wings of a Cessna (sic) plane", but one could have a flying person wearing webbed finger gloves.

If, as stated, "the rules of the magic currently do not allow the ability to fly", then the question is, is it that magic allows no direct provision for flight, or no indirect provision. If flight is disallowed in either direct or indirect usage, then you can't have flying beasties who don't adhere to the laws of physics. You can, however, tinker with the laws of physics. A low density world with very light gravity, for example. A world along the lines of Niven's "The Integral Trees"?

If flight through magic is disallowed directly only, then you can have magical flying creatures, violating physical laws, AND you leave open a great story line about people in such a fantasy setting trying to figure out how to fly. Which spells, in which combination...

Tom


Posts: 60 | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Crystal Stevens
Member
Member # 8006

 - posted      Profile for Crystal Stevens   Email Crystal Stevens         Edit/Delete Post 
That's already been done, more-or-less, in the Xanth series. The flying centaurs of Xanth flick themselves with their tails to make their bodies lighter so they can use their wings to fly. They can also use a flick of their tail to make other things light. Say like the people they might be tranporting from one place to another.
Posts: 1320 | Registered: May 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rommel Fenrir Wolf II
Member
Member # 4199

 - posted      Profile for Rommel Fenrir Wolf II   Email Rommel Fenrir Wolf II         Edit/Delete Post 
Or the creature can be filled with a lighter than air element like Hydrogen or Helium. Like the Hindenburg or Graf Zeppelins in the 1930’s, ahh the golden days of air travel.

I wonder when they will build the next zeppelin, and name it Hindenburg II. I should build my own and name it the LED ZEPPELIN, zeppelin.

RFW2nd


Posts: 856 | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
Smaug can't fly...but dragons do not appear "on stage" in The Lord of the Rings...the Nazgul do but Tolkien was aware they resembled (in size if nothing else) flying creatures that once existed.

*****

On Zepplins---not long ago, the Zepplin company made a small Zepplin for possible use in the tourist trade. I was hoping it would lead to more, but I haven't heard. (The company of course still exists in Germany---they make aluminum products.)


Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rommel Fenrir Wolf II
Member
Member # 4199

 - posted      Profile for Rommel Fenrir Wolf II   Email Rommel Fenrir Wolf II         Edit/Delete Post 
Do they make Titanium aluminum aircraft framing?

I need to find some for my plane that I want to build

But should I build my own zeppelin and call it The Led Zeppelin zeppelin

RFW2nd


Posts: 856 | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
wetwilly
Member
Member # 1818

 - posted      Profile for wetwilly   Email wetwilly         Edit/Delete Post 
Woops. My mistake. Been a while since I read "The Hobbit." I thought I remembered the human guy at the end shooting an arrow into Smaug's soft spot while Smaug flew overhead, ravaging the city. Faulty memory, I guess. I still stand by the idea of what I was saying, though, even if my example was bad.
Posts: 1528 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
Should'a said the Nazgul's steeds, not the Nazgul themselves, the Ringwraiths...the Nazgul and their steeds appeared together, but the Nazgul also appeared separately...
Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
Y'know, sometimes I type things without reading them before hand. This time I posted it, waited a day, posted something else---then noticed it.

Smaug can fly---did fly---did just as "wetwilly" said.

I meant to put "can" but somehow put "can't."


Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2