quote:One thing I disliked about the movies is that they showed Aragorn's character incorrectly, in that they showed him as reluctant to take up the quest and the burden of fighting against Sauron and returning his line to kingship over humans in Middle Earth. This is slander. Aragorn from his earliest youth (he grew up in Rivendell with Elrond) was an enemy of Sauron and embraced his destiny.
quote:Part of that was the whole "Galadriel as Large Marge" bit when she's offered the ring
Amen. Actually, I think PJ did a pretty poor job with his interpretations of most of the characters. Some of them he got mostly right, but still robbed them of--in my opinion--crucial moments. Others were just plain wrong. I think Boromir was about the only character I was completely satisfied with, with Gandalf and Gollum as close seconds.
And may I just say, Jake, that I think that was a truly awesome pop culture reference.
Posts: 4534 | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
i always pictured boromir being bigger that what they portrayed. By that i mean more muscular and powerful. But I was very satisfied with the character anyway.
Posts: 1401 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Here is an article I compiled from several different sources talking about the nature of the spirits of Elves and Humans and why the Elves that remain in our mortal world seem more interested in just existing rather than the energetic Elves of the Ages of the Trees or the First Age of the Sun... and why the Rings of Power project was started...
quote: "...the longevity of the Quendi[Elves] was derived primarily from their fëar[souls], whose nature or 'doom' was to abide in Arda[Earth] until its end. Therefore, after the vitality of the hröa[body] was expended in achieving full growth, it began to weaken or grow weary. Very slowly indeed, but to all the Quendi perceptibly. For a while it would be fortified and maintained by its indwelling fëa, and then its vitality would begin to ebb, and its desire for physical life and joy in it would pass ever more swiftly away. Then an Elf would begin (as they say now, for these things did not fully appear in the Elder Days) to 'fade', until the fëa as it were consumed the hröa until it remained only in the love and memory of the spirit that had inhabited it.
But in Aman[Valinor], since its blessing descended upon the hröa of the Eldar[another name for the Elves], as upon all other bodies, the hröa aged only apace with the fëar, and the Eldar that remained in the Blessed Realm endured in full maturity and in undimmed power of body and spirit conjoined for ages beyond our mortal comprehension."
Text XI Myths Transformed
***
This does not necessarily mean that Men would live forever - they might live longer (or not cf the example of Lúthien :the wise have said that the Silmaril hastened their end; for the flame of the beauty of Lúthien as she wore it was too bright for mortal lands.) as do the creatures of Aman (all those creatures that were thither transplanted or were trained or bred or brought into being for the purpose of inhabitation in Aman were given a speed of growth such that one year of the life natural to their kinds on Earth should in Aman be one Valian Year.), but despite a possible prolongation of life, the fëar of Men was not intended for eternal life within Arda. [As this was a post-Lord of the Rings essay, the Valian year was 144 years of the Sun. Thus a human body in Aman might be able to live for up to 144 times its Natural span in Middle-earth] However this is not as straight-forward as it appears. Tolkien addresses the possibility of Men dwelling in Aman in the continuation of the cited text:Quote: But let us suppose that the 'blessing of Aman' was also accorded to Men.* What then? Would a great good be done to them? Their bodies would still come swiftly to full growth. In the seventh part of a [Valian] year a Man could be born and become full-grown, as swiftly as in Aman a bird would hatch and fly from the nest. But then it would not wither or age but would endure in vigour and in the delight of bodily living. But what of that Man's fëar? Its nature and 'doom' could not be changed, neither by the health of Aman nor by the will of Manwë[King of the gods/Valar] himself. Yet it is (as the Eldar hold) its nature and doom under the will of Eru Iluvatar[God] that it should not endure Arda for long, but should depart and go elsewhither, returning maybe direct to Eru for another fate or purpose that is beyond the knowledge or guess of the Eldar.
Very soon then the fëar and hröa of a Man in Aman would not be united and at peace, but would be opposed, to the great pain of both. The hröa being in full vigour and joy of life would cling to the fëa, lest its departure should bring death; and against death it would revolt as would a great beast in full life either flee from the hunter or turn savagely upon him. But the fëa would be as it were in prison, becoming ever more weary of all the delights of the hröa, until they were loathsome to it, longing ever more and more to be gone, until even those matters for its thought that it received through the hröa and its senses became meaningless. The Man would not be blessed, but accursed; and he would curse the Valar and Aman and all the things of Arda. And he would not willingly leave Aman, for that would mean rapid death, and he would have to be thrust forth with violence. But if he remained in Aman, what should he come to, ere Arda were at last fulfilled and he found release? Either his fëa would be wholly dominated by the hröa, and he would become more like a beast, though one tormented within. Or else, if his fëa were strong, it would leave the hröa, Then one of two things would happen: either this would be accomplished only in hate, by violence, and the hröa, in full life, would be rent and die in sudden agony; or else the fëa would in loathing and without pity desert the hröa, and it would live on, a witless body, not even a beast but a monster, a very work of Melkor in the midst of Aman, which the Valar themselves would fain destroy.
Now these things are but matters of thought, and might-have-beens; for Eru and the Valar under Him have not permitted Men as they are to dwell in Aman. Yet at least it may be seen that Men in Aman would not escape the dread of death, but would have it in greater degree and for long ages. And moreover, it seems probable that death itself, either in agony or horror, would with Men enter into Aman itself. * [Footnote] Or (as some Men hold) that their hröar are not by nature short-lived, but have become so through the malice of Melkor over and above the general marring of Arda, and that this hurt could be healed and undone in Aman.
Myths Transformed, Text XI, Aman, HOME X, Morgoth's Ring.
Thus at best, the animal nature of the human hröa would dominate the entrapped fëa and the 'prolonged' Man would live as a beast; or else he would either die in agony or his hröa would live as a mindless shell after his fëa abandoned it. This would not apply to Tuor, who had his 'kind' changed by the express action of Eru; or the Ringbearers, who would eventually choose to accept the Gift of Ilúvatar with estel long before their fëar and hröar became 'disunited'.
[The Akallabêth, it must be remembered, is a Númenórean text, and thus (to my mind) of lesser credibility than JRRT writing as Editor and Redactor of all available Middle-earth lore, as he does in his Essays. Thus while Elendil might record in that work:Quote: The Eldar reported these words to the Valar, and Manwë was grieved, seeing a cloud gather on the noontide of Númenor. And he sent messengers to the Dúnedain, who spoke earnestly to the King, and to all who would listen, concerning the fate and fashion of the world.
'The Doom of the World,' they said, 'One alone can change who made it. And were you so to voyage that escaping all deceits and snares you came indeed to Aman, the Blessed Realm, little would it profit you. For it is not the land of Manwë that makes its people deathless, but the Deathless that dwell therein have hallowed the land; and there you would but wither and grow weary the sooner, as moths in a light too strong and steadfast.'
'Akallabêth, The Silmarillion,
[ August 04, 2004, 02:03 PM: Message edited by: Telperion the Silver ]
Posts: 4953 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
On the Galadriel issue, I think Cate did a great job! Galadriel was the only force holding Sauron at bay, at least on the magic/psychic level (Gondor was holding him back on a military level). She is a Third Generation High Elf after all of royal blood with a Ring of Power... she's almost a demi-god at this point.
Galadriel needed to be shown as a powerful ethereal figure. Of course the Galadriel goes nuclear scene is up for debate...
The look of her for the movie is great too. Pale skin and great hair and those eyes! Super cool. Cate shows the true authority that Lady Galadriel has.
[ August 04, 2004, 02:37 PM: Message edited by: Telperion the Silver ]
Posts: 4953 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The answers on the elf reproduction question cleared that up for me, dunno why I didn't think of those reasons myself. Never mind it was a minor gripe. This is what bugged me in the movies: First and foremost - pointy ears on the elves!!! I can't find anywhere in tolkien where it says they had those ears. Second, the silly way they all marched into Helm's Deep, like toy soldiers. I didn't like Cate Blanchett at first, but she was one of the oldest living things in Middle Earth, so eventually I thought that she had the right amount of gravitas for that,as opposed to Gandalf, for example, who was more a man of the people, so to speak.
Posts: 867 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Let the self proclaimed Tolkien scholar and geek-boy help!
Tolkien DID say the Elves had pointy ears. Well... the actual quote is that they are "leaf shaped"... but it's about the same thing.
But Tolkien didn't make too much of a deal about ears. To him the eyes were most important. It looked like reflected stars in their eyes (you can really see this in the Galadriel scenes). And of course the High Elves had a glow about them, residue from the Uttermost West.
Now, even though I'm a purist I'm also a pragmatist. I enjoyed the Elves at Helm's Deep as it reflected the themes from the Silmarillion. And I thought the Elves marching into Helm's Deep was really cool ....why? Because to me it showed their cultural superiority and how advanced they are over the fallen civilizations of Man.
And so called Balrog debate? Pha... If people would just read the book they would see that the Balrog DID have wings.
quote:The Balrog made no answer. The fire in it seemed to die, but the darkness grew. It stepped forward slowly on to the bridge, and suddenly it drew itself up to a great height, and it's wings were spread from wall to wall ; but still Gandalf could still be seen, glimmering in the gloom; he seemed small, and altogether alone: grey and bent, like a wizened tree before the onset of a storm.
posted
Tolkien's description of elven ears were that they were "leaf-shaped" So he definitely made mention of the fact that their ears were different from humans.
I think pointy ears makes sense, unless you want them to have ears shaped like a maple leaf.
Posts: 14428 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
I understand that in a previous version of Street Fighter 2, or perhaps in the planning, the boxer's name was originally M. Bison and the final boss's name was Balrog, but the names were swapped because M. Bison was too close to M. Tyson.
posted
C'mon Telp, it's not taht simple. If that passage were cut and dry, no one would be arguing the question.
Many people (myself included) think that's a metaphor referring to the shadow he cast, which in an earlier passage was described as having wings.
And, Tolkien was a master linguist, why use a metaphor of wings when the thing really had wings - why not just mention his winged shadow literally?
Then there's the description somewhere of the balrogs running or charging - obviously not flying though.
We're never given an indication that the Balrog can fly - if he did, why didn't he just fly when the bridge crumbled beneath him? And if he doesn't fly, of what use is there for him to have wings?
Posts: 14428 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
IIRC correctly, there *is* a reference of Balrogs flying into battle, but it's phrased in such a way that you cold interpret it as "flying with wings" or "running really fast".
Of course, there's also anough lee-way to flame others for days on end about how they aren't smart enough to agree with you.
Posts: 16551 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, why do flamingos need wings? and chickens?
Wings made the balrog seem more menacing. Flaming wings of death those were. wings made him seem like more of a demon, which i liked a lot. he wouldn't be the same without them. I'm not sure if he can fly but wings are necessary anyway in my mind.
Posts: 1401 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
yeah but they didn't look REAL when they marched in to Helm's Deep. It was just too artificial for me. However, I'm very forgiving, and the realities of having to tell and depict in a completely different medium, and to early 21st century (as opposed to mid-20th) sensibilities, and to eyes not familiar with the stories necessarily, enabled me to basically ignore those things. Plus, the rest of the things in the movies were done so well. I LOVED the Balrog! For me, in the books, the two most powerful scenes were Frodo at the Ford of Bruinen, when the Nazgul were calling him to come to Mordor, and Gollum at the Cracks of Doom. Incredibly powerful. My favourite description of the elves is in the last part of the Appendix on the Eldar, where Tolkien gives a wonderful final summarising description of them, can't quote it, but I love it.
Posts: 867 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote: My favourite description of the elves is in the last part of the Appendix on the Eldar, where Tolkien gives a wonderful final summarising description of them, can't quote it, but I love it.
Yah... it makes me cry...
Posts: 4953 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:For me, in the books, the two most powerful scenes were Frodo at the Ford of Bruinen, when the Nazgul were calling him to come to Mordor, and Gollum at the Cracks of Doom. Incredibly powerful.
So, did the movie depiction of Frodo at the Ford upset you? It upset me immensely. It's upsetting me right now as I'm thinking of it.
Posts: 4534 | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Didn't upset me, more disappointment that they changed the Ford scene to involve Arwen more (but, hey the more Arwen on screen the better!). I thought Ralph Bakshi did the Ford scene really well though. The Cracks of Doom scene was okay. I was also looking forward to the Mouth of Sauron, but no Mouth ...
Posts: 867 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
At least it wasn't as bad as the ford scene in this movie. I've read the books about 5 times, and I still can't follow that scen in the movie.
Posts: 16551 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:How was it different? I couldn't get through the LOTR books. Sorry, don't hate me.
In the novel, Frodo races ahead of the group (I think because Glorfindel tells the horse to run) when the Nazgul arrive. He gets to the Ford of the Bruinen just ahead of the Nazgul, crosses, and stops on the other side. The Nazgul halt before crossing, calling to Frodo to come to them. Frodo fells the compulsion from them and from the Ring, and he is terribly weak--dying, in fact. Yet, somehow, he manages to call up some inner reserve of strength and draws his sword defiantly, telling the Nazgul that they shall have neither the Ring nor him. He is subsequently knocked unconscious by the Nazgul--who also break his sword--and then is saved by Gandalf and Elrond, who call up the river to drown the Nazgul.
In the film version, Arwen carries the semi-conscious Frodo on her horse, racing ahead when the Nazgul arrive. They chase her across the Ford, where she incants some sort of spell as she crosses. She then draws her sword and stands against the Nazgul--although I think that since she has already spoken her spell this is largely done to lure the Nazgul into the river, which she has enchanted to drown them. Frodo succumbs to the knife point in his wound just as the Nazgul are drowning, and Arwen cries about it.
Taking the moment of strength away from Frodo and turning him into a victim that needs to be cared for is unforgivable, in my opinion.
Posts: 4534 | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:At least it wasn't as bad as the ford scene in this movie. I've read the books about 5 times, and I still can't follow that scen in the movie.
Porter, that is the Ralph Bakshi version. You know, the Bakshi film gets all kinds of criticism, but I think that Bakshi actually did a better job of sticking to the spirit of the story. His actors were not as good, and the animation was kind of hokey, but I think he was at least paying attention to the story.
Posts: 4534 | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
The scene with Arwen and Elrond in the second movie, where he's challenging her about marrying Aragorn, and asks her if she doesn't love him (Elrond)too, and she runs to him and says she does love him, gets me every time. I have a daughter who married a lovely guy from California (they live in Utah), and I can relate to Elrond big-time in that scene. It's a dimension that isn't really looked at in the books, Elrond losing his only daughter.
Posts: 867 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
::shrug:: Well, I enjoy it, but that may have a lot to do with the fact that I was around 8 (±2) when I first saw it.
Posts: 4534 | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
Just because something runs doesn't mean they can't fly....the 2 aren't mutually exclusive...
I really liked Galadrial, but unlike most of you I thought the scene with her and Frodo in the grotto was perfect....just how I imagined it. That is one of my favorite scenes in the books too, and I thought it was true to the spirit of the books, and to a large extent to the actual description of what happened.
I can find a lot of thing I DIDN'T like about the movies (can anyone say Scouring of the Shire? According to Tolkien, it was the most important chapter he had written....), but the 2 criticisms I can't stand are about this scene and the scene with Bilbo in Rivendale.
Both people change, and almost succumb to the One Rings power, although for different reasons....the ring exerts itself very differently with those who have borne it or another Ring of Power, and I think the movies did a great job showing that.
quote:Both people change, and almost succumb to the One Rings power, although for different reasons....the ring exerts itself very differently with those who have borne it or another Ring of Power, and I think the movies did a great job showing that.
My gripe with the scene in Rivendell is not that Bilbo was tempted by the Ring. My problem is that that scene contains one of the most poignant lines in the entire trilogy, and PJ left it out. In the novel, Bilbo wants the Ring, but he masters himself--with difficulty--and tells Frodo to put it away. This is crucial, in my opinion. It shows again how much more strength and character a humble hobbit might have than a noble man or elf. And every time I read the part where Bilbo asks, "Don't adventures ever have an end?" it puts a little lump in my throat. I don't get that from the scene as Jackson portrayed it.
Obviously Jackson needed to show Bilbo being tempted by the Ring, but I think it was wrong of him to take away Bilbo's moment of strength. Throughout the films, Jackson takes nearly every opportunity to take a moment of strength for a hobbit and give it to a human or elf. It's mind-boggling to me why he would do that.
Posts: 4534 | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
The hobbit strength comes from the friendship and loyalty of the halfings to each other.
And Frodo has a moment or two of personal determination - but PJ has always viewed the series as a triumph of the collective, focusing on loyalty and friendship.
As to the Council of Elrond, my favorite scene is still with Jack Black and Sarah Michelle Gellar.
posted
If Balrogs could fly, how were the eagles able to hide Gondolin with their air defense? Wouldn't Melkor send out his Balrogs flying all over Middle Earth to find this troublesome country?
Eagles might be a match for Ringwraiths, but against a flying Balrog...
Posts: 4116 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
When I think about Balrog vs. Egale, I'm reminded of that scene in Mulan where Mushu toasted the Falcon with his firey breath: Toast turkey anyone?
Posts: 4116 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
See, now you have done it....you have made me break out my red book and quote....
quote: To his amazement he found that he was no longer looking at Bilbo; a shadow seemed to have fallen between them, and and through it he found himself eying a little wrinkled creature with a hungry face and bony groping hands. He felt a desire to strike him.
I agree that in the book Bilbo was stronger, but how else would PJ be able to emphasized the power that the Ring still had over Bilbo. I always got the feeling that Bilbo was on the verge of taking the Ring there, but that Frodo stopped him. The movie just exaggerated it ...and not really that much. Bilbo still stopped, and realized the power of the Ring.......
I found one of the things I didn't like about the movies was the infantilism of the hobbits. In the books, hobbits were every bit as brave and intelligent as huimans...perhaps more so even, as they were always at a physical disadvantage against others. In the movies they were comical relief. Merry and Pippen planned with Sam to follow Frodo, as they had figured out that something was up.....but in the movies they fell into the adventure by accident, simply by being in the wrong place at the wrong time. They survived the Barrows and the Old Forest, although they had a lot of help, but that showed how resilient they were and how they were taking an active role in their own survival.
In the movies, they don't really ever come into their own until the last movie, and even then things had to be fabricated to show their newfound maturity. Who scaled a tower to light the beacons? I forgot that...lol....and so did Tolkien, I guess..
I understand that they couldn't show everything, and I feel that they did a great job in trying to keep the same flavor as the books....
But how much more would it have cost to have Glamdring glow in the Mines of Moria?