posted
Keats, I agree. Further, it would lead to outlawing books like the Fire and Ice series and the like that merely describe underage sex.
Posts: 13123 | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Can someone provide a link to where this was made illegal? I definitely remember reading that it was declared legally protected speech. Was this overturned?
[edit: I'd look myself, but I'm not doing searches on "virtual child pornography" from work. Sorry.]
posted
Have you seen the stuff coming out of Japan right now?
None of those girls look a day older than 10 years old.
quote:Is there anything you can think of that the government has the right to outlaw that is done in the privacy of your own home and does not affect others?
Smoking marijuana fits nicely here. Yet the government makes it illegal.
Of course I am of the opinion that they have no right to do so.
Posts: 5656 | Registered: Oct 1999
| IP: Logged |
quote: I do find the precendent does exist because the damage spamming that type of porn would be on the public good is overwhelming in my mind.
At that point, though, your parameters that you set in your first post of not effecting others are no longer in effect.
Posts: 13123 | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
.
