FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Discussions About Orson Scott Card » Sighting of Ender's Game

   
Author Topic: Sighting of Ender's Game
Omega M.
Member
Member # 7924

 - posted      Profile for Omega M.           Edit/Delete Post 
From this essay:
quote:
Say you have a species that has already stressed the planet's resources to the point that relatively few of them have a decent standard of living. At some point, reason dictates that people stop reproducing so much. Let's say you have a generation of two billion people — one billion breeding pairs — and they realize, holy crow, we have to get the population stabilized... henceforth, there will be two children per couple, no more. And let's say that as much as 99% of the population goes along with this. The remaining 1% (perhaps after one too many readings of Ender's Game) say hell with that and have on average four children per couple. Within six generations, the descendants of the 1% outnumber the descendants of the 99%: selfishness wins.

Posts: 781 | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
That I think would only work if resources were still availiable enough for the 1% to sill outproduce the remaining 99%, this I think also doesn't include the possibility of "persecution" and living space. Also I am skeptical of the math, I don't extactly is how say 1% of 2 billion people will be able to outnumber the remaining 2 billion given any amount of time. Even within 6 generations, next as with the Wiggins they "supposedly" forsaken their parents and tried to live within Hegemony law and have only 1-2 children only getting Ender with permission.

What happens if 99% of those born from that 1% also accept the child limitation? Then your still technically stuck with 1% of the population not accepting the law yet 99% of the total still accept the law.

Thats my reasoning.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Orincoro
Member
Member # 8854

 - posted      Profile for Orincoro   Email Orincoro         Edit/Delete Post 
well its simple geometric expansion


2billion people with 1billion breading pairs and only 2 children each, produce another 2 billion people, or less, and 1billion breading pairs

BUT

20 million people, doubling that output each generation will produce an average of 2 billion 360 million by the SEVENTH generation, barring any other limitations on expansion -simple math but it would take SEVEN generations

Posts: 9912 | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Simple math yes but in reality probly only 1% of that breeding will at anyone time keep breeding 4+ children.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2