Hatrack River Writers Workshop   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Writers Workshop » Forums » Open Discussions About Writing » Starts of Authors

   
Author Topic: Starts of Authors
Phanto
Member
Member # 1619

 - posted      Profile for Phanto   Email Phanto         Edit/Delete Post 
I thought it would be a great idea to post the first thirteen lines of books which we love, and discuss the techniques the author uses to draw us in.

Would this be legally allowed?

If so, it should be informative and interesting to do so.


Posts: 697 | Registered: Mar 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
Jerome Vall
Member
Member # 1905

 - posted      Profile for Jerome Vall           Edit/Delete Post 
So long as we limit it to 13 lines, and so long as we state both author and work, it shouldn't be a problem. However, if we do this, we should probably stick to one intro per thread. Things would get too confusing if we're talking about several different intros. Since this is your idea, Phanto, why don’t you start.

More difficult, but perhaps more fruitful, would be a “reading thread.” What I mean is this: We pick a novel (preferably a short one) and discuss it at, say, one chapter per week. It wouldn’t matter if you’ve already read it so long as you’d be willing to reread it.

Is this something you all would be interested in doing?

Kathleen, what do you think?


Posts: 68 | Registered: Jan 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
Kathleen Dalton Woodbury
Administrator
Member # 59

 - posted      Profile for Kathleen Dalton Woodbury   Email Kathleen Dalton Woodbury         Edit/Delete Post 
I agree about limiting the quotes to the first 13 lines, and about having a different topic for each story. I could see about setting up a separate discussion area for this. Any ideas on what we could call it?

As for the reading thread idea, there would be no postings of lines from the books, but discussing the books chapter by chapter sounds fine. A good way to learn from what has already been done.


Posts: 8826 | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  | Report this post to a Moderator
TruHero
Member
Member # 1766

 - posted      Profile for TruHero   Email TruHero         Edit/Delete Post 
This may be corny, but You could name it:
INTRO: Hook, Line, or Sinker.
It would be easy to term it this way too. Three definitions as follows:

Hook: It definately hooked me.
Line: Eh? It's ok, just some lines.
Sinker: I thought it sucked, too boring.

You could add AUTHOR OR PRO in front of INTRO to clarify a bit more.
Good or no? I thought it was kinda catchy!

[This message has been edited by TruHero (edited February 02, 2004).]


Posts: 471 | Registered: Sep 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
PE_Sharp
Member
Member # 1654

 - posted      Profile for PE_Sharp   Email PE_Sharp         Edit/Delete Post 
How 'bout Hook, Line, and Floater. Eh... maybe not.

PE Sharp

[This message has been edited by PE_Sharp (edited February 02, 2004).]


Posts: 47 | Registered: Jun 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
Lord Darkstorm
Member
Member # 1610

 - posted      Profile for Lord Darkstorm   Email Lord Darkstorm         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Any ideas on what we could call it?

I would assume that "Writing Class" is there for that purpose. If you are looking to keep this concept separate, how about "Dissecting the Beginning" or just "Beginnings". Or someone could come up with a better one...


Posts: 807 | Registered: Mar 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
Jerome Vall
Member
Member # 1905

 - posted      Profile for Jerome Vall           Edit/Delete Post 
Kathleen,

The title needs to indicate that we are studying the works of published stories; we are not looking at our own work. Why not call it DISCUSSIONS ABOUT PUBLISHED FICTION. It’s not very sexy, but it precisely indicates the goal of the discussion area. You'd probably need a caveat indicating that the discussion area is dedicated to discussing ONLY published fiction, both short and long.


[This message has been edited by Jerome Vall (edited February 02, 2004).]


Posts: 68 | Registered: Jan 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
Kathleen Dalton Woodbury
Administrator
Member # 59

 - posted      Profile for Kathleen Dalton Woodbury   Email Kathleen Dalton Woodbury         Edit/Delete Post 
The pun-lover in me likes TruHero's idea of "Hook, Line, and Sinker" (though I'd change it to "Hook, Line, and Stinker"), but I think Jerome Vall is right.

I've decided to archive the Writing Decision Stories discussion area and I'll turn that into a Discussions about Published Fiction area. ("Been there, done that" appeals to me, too; but Jerome Vall's logic wins out.)


Posts: 8826 | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  | Report this post to a Moderator
Kathleen Dalton Woodbury
Administrator
Member # 59

 - posted      Profile for Kathleen Dalton Woodbury   Email Kathleen Dalton Woodbury         Edit/Delete Post 
Okay, it's up, under the title of "Discussing Published Hooks."

Thanks for the idea and suggestions on what to call it.


Posts: 8826 | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2