posted
if you're talking about the Malazan Books of the Fallen by Stephen Erikson, then yes, I've read them and I agree, they're unbelievable. I've read my share of fantasy and I've never come across a world so incredibly huge and detailed, with so many interesting characters, so many plotlines, so intricate....I'm running out of adjectives. Basically I'm addicted. I would buy anything by Erikson, sight unseen, based on these books. whenever i emerge from his books, I find myself swearing like a Malazan--Hood's breath!
Posts: 9 | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I like reading that. I just picked up a book by Stephen Erikson -- not sure of the title offhand. Funny thing is, I picked it up because it sold me in the first 13.
Posts: 3687 | Registered: Jan 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm not 100% clear on what 'high' and 'low' fantasys are, but i'd guess the Malazan books are more 'high' fantasy. it's definitely not typical sword and sorcery; he's got some very unique takes on magic, gods, and armies and everything in between. i haven't read George RR Martin or Keyes, so I couldn't really compare, but if you love epic fantasy, you'll like Erikson's books.
Posts: 9 | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Low fantasy is generaly low magic, magic is something that takes place off scene.
High fantasy is the more typical epic fantasy where magic is plentiful and big.
Magic can be weak or powerful in either setting, but in low fantasy magic is typically in the background and the stories are more humancentric (no elves or such).
If you haven't read Martin or Keyes I cannot recomend them more strongly.
George RR Martins, A Game of Thrones and the 3 books that follow (A Clash of Kings, A Storm of Swords and A Feast of Crows) are the best fantasy novels I've read. Greg Keyes books, The Briar King, Charnel Prince and Blood Knight are a close second.
The Greg Keyes books move closer to epic fantasy after starting in low fantasy.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
