Hatrack River Writers Workshop   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Writers Workshop » Forums » Discussing Published Hooks & Books » Analog

   
Author Topic: Analog
Bent Tree
Member
Member # 7777

 - posted      Profile for Bent Tree   Email Bent Tree         Edit/Delete Post 
Does anyone read Analog? I usually read Asimov's and Strange Horizons, but I picked up an April. I was really dissapointed. Nothing got my interest. I am sure the Joe Haldeman would be quite good, but it was the conclusion to a series, so I didn't bother. Nearly every intro I tried was in the first person and read like a detective novel.The one short story that I read through completion, I did out of spite, just to make sure that it was as bad as I thought it started. Complete with two incomprehensible setences, and two glaring stereotypes it was-- just as bad. I actually said What....well nevermind.

[This message has been edited by Bent Tree (edited March 11, 2008).]


Posts: 1888 | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Khalan
Member
Member # 5950

 - posted      Profile for Khalan   Email Khalan         Edit/Delete Post 
I usually read Asimov's and F&SF, but picked up a copy of Analog recently to give it a try. I guess I'm not the target audience, because I really didn't get into it. Now I'm not even sure where I put it.
Posts: 46 | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
The first SF magazine I ever bought was an issue of Analog...it was two or three years before I even realized there were other SF magazines...however I didn't buy another for a full year (concentrating on SF books, mostly), and started my subscription right after that (that pesky money thing, though I don't remember how much it cost).

I still subscribe, but I rarely submit things to them even when I've got something. Both my general disenchantment with SF reading, and something about the direction Analog has gone in, just get together and keep me from diving into it too much. I'll still leaf through the copies I get.

(Sidebar thought: when then-editor John Campbell changed the name from Astounding to Analog, it seemed (to him) to make the magazine more hip and edgy and technologically advanced. But what do, er, regular people, not SF readers, think of when they hear the word "analog" these days?)


Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kathleen Dalton Woodbury
Administrator
Member # 59

 - posted      Profile for Kathleen Dalton Woodbury   Email Kathleen Dalton Woodbury         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, if they are trying to figure out why their televisions won't work in a year and what to do about it, they may think "analog" means out-dated.
Posts: 8826 | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TheOnceandFutureMe
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
I picked up a copy of Analog once, and I don't think I'll do it again. If I wanted to get preached at, I'd go to church naked. The stories that I read were little more than angry scientists yelling about creationism. I'm not even a creationist and I was offended.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
"As soon as possible" would be a good time to change the name back to Astounding...
Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2