FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Discussions About Orson Scott Card » Shadow of the Giant question **may contain spoilers**

   
Author Topic: Shadow of the Giant question **may contain spoilers**
genius00345
Member
Member # 8206

 - posted      Profile for genius00345   Email genius00345         Edit/Delete Post 
In SOTG, many countries are listed as having petitioned for plebiscites, but OSC never actually confirmed that they joined the FPE.

If I was to make a list of the FPE countries, should I list those countries or not?

Posts: 206 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
genius00345
Member
Member # 8206

 - posted      Profile for genius00345   Email genius00345         Edit/Delete Post 
Never mind...I just re-read the ending and I remembered that OSC had said that only America had not joined the FPE yet.

I do have a list, though, of all the countries mentioned by name that joined. An asterisk means that their acceptance into the FPE was officially recognized in the book, all others were mentioned as FPE allies or as holding plebiscites.

NORTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA, CARRIBEAN:

*Haiti
Belize
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic


SOUTH AMERICA:

*Brazil (FPE capital-Blackstream, supervisor R. Bellini)
*Bolivia
*Chile
*Ecuador
*Suriname
*Guyana
*Peru
*Runa (parts of Ecuador, Bolivia, Peru)
Cayenne
Colombia


AFRICA:

*Rwanda (FPE capital-Kiyagi, supervisor F. Starman)
*Botswana
*Mozambique
*Cameroon
*Angola
*Ghana
*Liberia
*Nubia (SW Sudan)
Uganda
South Africa
*Nigeria
Namibia
Burundi


ASIA:

*Phillipines
*Thailand (FPE capital-Bangkok, supervisor Paribatra)
*Russia


OCEANIA:

*Tonga
*Vanuatu
*Kiribati
Fiji


EUROPE:

*Netherlands (FPE capital-Rotterdam, supervisor K. Boom)
*Slovenia
*Czechland
*Estonia
*Finland
Poland
Rumania
Hungary
Serbia
Austria
Greece
Belarus
Belgium
*Bulgaria
*Latvia
*Lithuania
Slovakia

Posts: 206 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Haloed Silhouette
Member
Member # 8062

 - posted      Profile for Haloed Silhouette   Email Haloed Silhouette         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
If I was
I remember hearing that it's more proper to say "if I were". But now that I think of it, it makes no sense! I was, we were!
Posts: 358 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Hamson
Member
Member # 7808

 - posted      Profile for Hamson   Email Hamson         Edit/Delete Post 
I commend you on your list.
Posts: 879 | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
0range7Penguin
Member
Member # 7337

 - posted      Profile for 0range7Penguin           Edit/Delete Post 
Did you just do this for fun or is it for a project of some kind?
Posts: 832 | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Feiwaltan
Member
Member # 7912

 - posted      Profile for Feiwaltan   Email Feiwaltan         Edit/Delete Post 
hey did you leave out some asian countries, such as, India, China, and some other once?
quote: "Did you just do this for fun or is it for a project of some kind?" the same thing i was thinking of.

Posts: 29 | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
genius00345
Member
Member # 8206

 - posted      Profile for genius00345   Email genius00345         Edit/Delete Post 
I was just doing it for fun as I was reading...I had planned on making a map.

Feiwaltan: When I read, I didn't see anywhere that India or China had actually petitioned for or held a plebiscite IN THE BOOK. I know that it says the only country not joined was America, but I don't think any other countries than what's above were listed by name. And, I can't check because I returned my (overdue) copy of SOTG.

Posts: 206 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Annie
Member
Member # 295

 - posted      Profile for Annie   Email Annie         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I remember hearing that it's more proper to say "if I were". But now that I think of it, it makes no sense! I was, we were!
That's because it's proper to use the subjunctive mood when you're speaking of subjective, hypothetical, or wishful situations. The example you give is in the indicative mood.

The subjunctive mood uses the third-person singular conjugation of the verb minus the S. In the case of to be, there is a past subjunctive form in addition to the typical present form: were. (the present subjunctive of to be can be seen in phrases like "be that as it may.")

It's proper to say "I wish I were homeward bound," "If I were a rich girl," and "Best take your yellow slicker, Nigel, lest it rain!"

But it's OK. It's not like anyone speaks English these days anyway. [Razz]

Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MidnightBlue
Member
Member # 6146

 - posted      Profile for MidnightBlue   Email MidnightBlue         Edit/Delete Post 
I speak American. [Smile]
Posts: 1547 | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Annie
Member
Member # 295

 - posted      Profile for Annie   Email Annie         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, that's handy, since North American English is one of the two remaining dialects to still utilize the subjunctive.
Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lock and key
Member
Member # 8073

 - posted      Profile for Lock and key   Email Lock and key         Edit/Delete Post 
north american, english, american, stark, it's all the same/greek to me
Posts: 9 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2