*makes with bedroom eyes at CT and jerks thumb over shoulders at luxuriant (non-apopoplectic-nor-surgerially-traumatic-emergency-service) thingomopainomatic.*
posted
It's not all that bad. I'm picturing CT in black leather, holding a whip, and having you under complete control of the thingomopainomatic.
Posts: 270 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
fallow, It's difficult for me to seperate your best work from your not so great work. Frequently I am left nursing a sprained brain after having attempted to assimilate your unique thought processes.
Is there a self-help book or tutorial that would help me in fallow comprehension? Or perhaps a pharmaceutical aid? Posts: 2022 | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Pffft. A Claudia Therese cannot be captured, nor chained. She can only be admired in her free and natural state. Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
let's see, can obtain the scarves and the hat... can keep canadian healthcare jokes to a minimum... don't even have a camera... know scotches well enough to make a good impression... have scads of children, the latest under 2 mos. old...
well, if I can just keep from telling her what an amazingly cool person she is, I should be in prime position to ensnare myself a lovely specimen... as soon as I can trick her into visiting Texas.
posted
I suggest the good ol' quantum physics method : At any given time, there is a non-zero probability that the CT is contained in the thingomopainomatic. Sit and wait.
Or if you prefer classical physics, the Newton method is for you : CT and thingomopainomatic attract each other gravitationally. We consider friction and air resistance as negligible. Sit and wait.
Posts: 10645 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
That tends to be the method everyone describes for classical physics, but I like this better (still using gravity):
CT and the <whatever> attract each other gravitationally. Thus at every moment the probability of any material part of CT being closer to the <whatever> is slightly greater than the probability of it being farther apart or closer. So at every instanst CT get's slightly closer to the <whatever>. Well statistically she may veer off and take other, rand paths, but the law of averages says that eventually she has to gravitate to her most statistically favorable point, which is, due to gravity, the <whatever>
Of course my way is way more long winded... maybe that's why I like it better.
Poor fallow, he ain't got no CT to call his own. It's the CT of broken dreams for you, boy! It's the CT that never sleeps.
Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
The Newton method indicates that your mass is non-zero. Surely that's not flattery in today's America?
Posts: 10645 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
No such thing! Unless you're talking about bubbling noises. Sometimes I make "aquarium music" for obnoxious telemarketers. My wife thinks it's disgusting.
Posts: 2655 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[ROFL]](graemlins/rofl.gif)
![[Cry]](graemlins/cry.gif)
I didn't know! I'm so sorry! <<<<<hugs>>>>>
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
(((((CT)))))![[Hat]](graemlins/hat.gif)
