FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » An incorruptible government... (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: An incorruptible government...
whydidntitakethebluepill
Member
Member # 8320

 - posted      Profile for whydidntitakethebluepill   Email whydidntitakethebluepill         Edit/Delete Post 
doesn't exist, I know. Nevertheless, I'm collecting ideas about a government that cannot be corrupted as easily as today's governments. Any ideas, even crazy ones (especially crazy ones) will help me zip through this assignment. thanks
Posts: 6 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
1) A perfect democracy, in which all citizens vote on all issues, and no issue is decided without a majority vote of the eligible population (and not just a voting majority.)

2) 24-hour surveillance of all government representatives, with web feeds available for persual online by any interested parties.

Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
My friend Don (he was in the wedding...) has this fantastic idea. Instead of electing people to Congress, we all get assigned at random to serve in the legislative branch for a specific term and then you go on your merry way. You don't have any campaigns, no funding, etc.

If the idea of the great unwashed being "in charge" for awhile makes you worried, we could make people pass a test first and then select at random from all the qualified candidates.

But I like treating it just like jury duty. Tag, you're it.

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tante Shvester
Member
Member # 8202

 - posted      Profile for Tante Shvester   Email Tante Shvester         Edit/Delete Post 
Can't we just make me supreme dictator? I'll be nice and fair. I promise. [Embarrassed]
Posts: 10397 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Verily the Younger
Member
Member # 6705

 - posted      Profile for Verily the Younger   Email Verily the Younger         Edit/Delete Post 
I actually came up with a concept for a government that I think would be superior to any form so far devised. But I won't post it here, 'cause then everyone will jump on it and tell me why it's a terrible idea. [Razz]
Posts: 1814 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mackillian
Member
Member # 586

 - posted      Profile for mackillian   Email mackillian         Edit/Delete Post 
Bob, I'd hate that, 'cause then I'd have to serve! Actually, I might not have to. I haven't even been called for jury duty yet.
Posts: 14745 | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
mack...my first jury duty experience was on a Grand Jury. It was GREAT! I highly recommend it.

And just remember, a hung jury has nothing to do with nooses.

Or genitalia.

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
whydidntitakethebluepill
Member
Member # 8320

 - posted      Profile for whydidntitakethebluepill   Email whydidntitakethebluepill         Edit/Delete Post 
Come on Verily the Younger, lets discuss your concept for a government
Posts: 6 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Irami Osei-Frimpong
Member
Member # 2229

 - posted      Profile for Irami Osei-Frimpong   Email Irami Osei-Frimpong         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
1) A perfect democracy, in which all citizens vote on all issues, and no issue is decided without a majority vote of the eligible population (and not just a voting majority.)
What's the big deal about deciding issues through the consent of the majority? It's not possible that 51 percent of the people can be corrupt?
Posts: 5600 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Homonculus
Member
Member # 7486

 - posted      Profile for Homonculus   Email Homonculus         Edit/Delete Post 
I like the idea of giving most of the power to the ordinary people. However, wouldnt they need to have some sort of qualification? i.e. some sort of higher education, distinction within their communities, etc.?
Posts: 20 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kojabu
Member
Member # 8042

 - posted      Profile for kojabu           Edit/Delete Post 
I feel like it would be very hard to get 51% of the population to agree on anything.
Posts: 2867 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tante Shvester
Member
Member # 8202

 - posted      Profile for Tante Shvester   Email Tante Shvester         Edit/Delete Post 
Um, didn't they agree to elect Al Gore to the presidency?
Posts: 10397 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Homonculus
Member
Member # 7486

 - posted      Profile for Homonculus   Email Homonculus         Edit/Delete Post 
Extension of previous post... What if there weren't any politicians?
Posts: 20 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
fugu13
Member
Member # 2859

 - posted      Profile for fugu13   Email fugu13         Edit/Delete Post 
No, that was a much smaller percentage, and even of those who voted it was a fraction of one percent total advantage to Gore.

You know, I'm not sure when the last guy actually got the majority of the population voting in his favor. Decades, at least.

Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rollainm
Member
Member # 8318

 - posted      Profile for rollainm   Email rollainm         Edit/Delete Post 
I've got it! The perfect government:

There will be no rich or poor. Everyone will be equal. Jobs will be assigned by the government and...wait...

Posts: 1945 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kojabu
Member
Member # 8042

 - posted      Profile for kojabu           Edit/Delete Post 
Yea, with a turnout at 30% or lower and that being split, getting 50% to vote one way would be kinda hard. There'd have to be some sort of cash incentive or something. [Smile]
Posts: 2867 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
whydidntitakethebluepill
Member
Member # 8320

 - posted      Profile for whydidntitakethebluepill   Email whydidntitakethebluepill         Edit/Delete Post 
What if the voting process was made easier? Like portable electronic ballots built into cellphones or something (with finger print identification, of course). Anyway, to add to Bob and Homonculus' point, what if members of the congress weren't politicians, but people who contribute to society, like doctors and engineers?
Posts: 6 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Homonculus
Member
Member # 7486

 - posted      Profile for Homonculus   Email Homonculus         Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting idea. I wonder what Uncle Orson would have to say...
Posts: 20 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Danzig
Member
Member # 4704

 - posted      Profile for Danzig   Email Danzig         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong:
What's the big deal about deciding issues through the consent of the majority? It's not possible that 51 percent of the people can be corrupt?

Not in the same way as our elected and appointed officials are now, no.
Posts: 1364 | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Vadon
Member
Member # 4561

 - posted      Profile for Vadon           Edit/Delete Post 
Something that cannot become corrupt.

Simple, have a computer that is not able to be hacked in any shape or form, also, its programming is bug-free. (Just pretend it exists.) And have it make all of the decisions based on rationality.

Mind you, I would never follow under a government like this, for to teach a computer ethics would be very difficult.

But, it is, impossible to corrupt.

Posts: 1831 | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MrSquicky
Member
Member # 1802

 - posted      Profile for MrSquicky   Email MrSquicky         Edit/Delete Post 
Again, one of my favorite quotes. From Brecht's Galileo:
quote:
- Pity the land that has no hero.
- No. Pity the land that needs a hero.

The solution to corruption in not in a system. The best system can only keep it at bay somewhat. The only way to be free of corruption is change the people in the system.

I think approaching government as an entity working on a static population is a mistake. Rather, I think seeing it as a function that takes in a population with some characteristics and results in a population with different characteristics can be a very useful perspective.

Posts: 10177 | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Danzig
Member
Member # 4704

 - posted      Profile for Danzig   Email Danzig         Edit/Delete Post 
Appoint someone like me dictator. I am already self-serving, so you know what you are getting. On the other hand I have nothing against the populace, as mainly I would just want to enjoy a few simple pleasures. Therefore I would have an incentive to rule well, so that I may enjoy said pleasures for as long as possible without fear of assassination.
Posts: 1364 | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Homonculus
Member
Member # 7486

 - posted      Profile for Homonculus   Email Homonculus         Edit/Delete Post 
Danzig, that sounds all well and nice, and I'm not doubting that you would rule well. However, power corrupts, and I'm pretty sure that as a dictator, you would soon forget your initial plans. I wonder, how could we build a system that would be free from corruption and free from politicians? And as the bluepill guy said, a system governed by doctors, engineers, etc..
Posts: 20 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
DavidR
Member
Member # 7473

 - posted      Profile for DavidR   Email DavidR         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
My friend Don (he was in the wedding...) has this fantastic idea. Instead of electing people to Congress, we all get assigned at random to serve in the legislative branch for a specific term and then you go on your merry way. You don't have any campaigns, no funding, etc.
Read "Songs of Distant Earth" by Arthur C. Clarke. That book is the first place I came across this idea.
Posts: 148 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jhai
Member
Member # 5633

 - posted      Profile for Jhai   Email Jhai         Edit/Delete Post 
How about drastically lowering all of the perks of being a politician? Give them, say, the median wage of the US population, no gifts, and no access to previous earned (or inherited) wealth while they're serving their term. In fact, make it downright unenjoyable to serve in office. Couple that with very strict rules on campaign finance (just give everyone in the race X amount of dollars, and that's ALL they get to spend), and there's no incentive to run for office unless you want to go in there and do something good for your country.
Posts: 2409 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mr_porteiro_head
Member
Member # 4644

 - posted      Profile for mr_porteiro_head   Email mr_porteiro_head         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
and there's no incentive to run for office unless you want to go in there and do something good for your country.
Yes there is for anybody currently earning lower than the median.
Posts: 16551 | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Farmgirl
Member
Member # 5567

 - posted      Profile for Farmgirl   Email Farmgirl         Edit/Delete Post 
Because humans are fallible and no human government can be absolutely perfect, The only perfectly incorruptible government is a theocracy ("government of a state by immediate divine guidance or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided") with a infallible God as head.

FG

Posts: 9538 | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Troubadour
Member
Member # 83

 - posted      Profile for Troubadour   Email Troubadour         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Yea, with a turnout at 30% or lower and that being split, getting 50% to vote one way would be kinda hard. There'd have to be some sort of cash incentive or something.
Well of course you could just do what we do in Australia. It's illegal not to vote. You get fined if you don't. Even in local elections. It means usually at least one trip to the polls a year.
Posts: 2245 | Registered: Nov 1998  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jhai
Member
Member # 5633

 - posted      Profile for Jhai   Email Jhai         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, then there's an incentive for around 90% of the population right now (I'm just taking a guess at the percentage) since the base wage for the House and Sente is $158,100. The Speaker of the House gets $203,000. Plus other benefits: linky
The median household income in 2002 was $42,409.

The thing I'm trying to point out, however, is that there are a lot of benifits that come with being a member of congress or otherwise involved in politics. Many of those in power are also quite rich to begin with - they win campaign with their own money and then continue to live in a pretty nice manner while in office.

If you took that away, and made the time in office fairly "uncomfortable" - flying coach, living in a middle-class neighborhood, saving up for a vacation or night out - basically all the things the average American has to do, then I think a lot of the people who are in Congress now would decide that the power they gain from being in office isn't worth the loss of their old lifestyle. Especially if they didn't get anything from that power besides the ability to say "I am a U.S. Senator/Congressman/President."

Posts: 2409 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
El JT de Spang
Member
Member # 7742

 - posted      Profile for El JT de Spang   Email El JT de Spang         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
2) 24-hour surveillance of all government representatives, with web feeds available for persual online by any interested parties.
I'm no judge, but I'm pretty sure that's unconstitutional.
Posts: 5462 | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
KarlEd
Member
Member # 571

 - posted      Profile for KarlEd   Email KarlEd         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, yes, it's probably unconstitutional in the US, but we're talking about theoretically uncorruptible governments, not necessarily ways to make the US government uncorruptible.

In other words, if you're starting from scratch, you can easily make a goverment where such a thing would not be unconstitutional. Just don't put any right to privacy in your constitution. Or you could specifically deny any right to privacy to any holder of public office.

Posts: 6394 | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
fugu13
Member
Member # 2859

 - posted      Profile for fugu13   Email fugu13         Edit/Delete Post 
Jhai -- however, its extremely hard for a congressperson to live on just that salary, the cost of living goes up hugely. She must maintain a residence in his home state and DC (some congresspeople share townhouses and such to keep costs down), she must travel extensively, she must maintain a high end wardrobe, she usually has a family who need to travel regularly to and fro in order to have time with her, et cetera.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Xavier
Member
Member # 405

 - posted      Profile for Xavier   Email Xavier         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Well of course you could just do what we do in Australia. It's illegal not to vote. You get fined if you don't. Even in local elections. It means usually at least one trip to the polls a year.
Yikes. I would say one of the most fundamental rights in government is to be able to not vote.
Posts: 5656 | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jacare Sorridente
Member
Member # 1906

 - posted      Profile for Jacare Sorridente   Email Jacare Sorridente         Edit/Delete Post 
The perfect government is one ruled by a perfectly wise philosopher king aided by a bureaucracy of the perfect size to enact all of the mandates of the king and no larger, manned by people who have no personal ambition. The king will make all of the right decisions and can implement them immediately through the efficient bureraucracy.
Posts: 4548 | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
El JT de Spang
Member
Member # 7742

 - posted      Profile for El JT de Spang   Email El JT de Spang         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
In other words, if you're starting from scratch, you can easily make a goverment where such a thing would not be unconstitutional. Just don't put any right to privacy in your constitution. Or you could specifically deny any right to privacy to any holder of public office
I don't think I want to get rid of the right to privacy.

As long as we're starting over.


I think the new country should be smaller. Based just on the fact that people are more responsible, respectful, and considerate when dealing with people they know.

Keep your community small, and you have less problems. Especially since I think that most of our country's problems come from people taking advantage of the system, which there's no way to prevent.

Posts: 5462 | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Danzig
Member
Member # 4704

 - posted      Profile for Danzig   Email Danzig         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Homonculus:
Danzig, that sounds all well and nice, and I'm not doubting that you would rule well. However, power corrupts, and I'm pretty sure that as a dictator, you would soon forget your initial plans. I wonder, how could we build a system that would be free from corruption and free from politicians? And as the bluepill guy said, a system governed by doctors, engineers, etc..

You missed the point. I am already as corrupt as I am going to get. No one could bribe me because I would be at the top, and though I might be corrupt in the sense of being selfish it would be in my own self-interest to have loyal government officials and a reasonably content populace, with a system that could withstand foreign and domestic threats. I would never care for the citizens for their own sake. Also in my case it would work because I do not so much want to rule as I would prefer ruling to being ruled.
Posts: 1364 | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
El JT de Spang
Member
Member # 7742

 - posted      Profile for El JT de Spang   Email El JT de Spang         Edit/Delete Post 
An honest politician?

Danzig has my vote for dictator.

/"And I, for one, would like to welcome our new alien overlords."

Posts: 5462 | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jay
Member
Member # 5786

 - posted      Profile for Jay   Email Jay         Edit/Delete Post 
Why should people who don’t care or know anything about the issues vote?
I’m not saying not to allow them to vote, but we seem to encourage people to vote no matter what.

Posts: 2845 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kojabu
Member
Member # 8042

 - posted      Profile for kojabu           Edit/Delete Post 
I think that gets into a different issue of voter apathy, etc. If you don't care about an issue, you won't make the effort of learning about the issue, which means you're probably less likely to vote (unless it's some major issue or issues that is/are the ultimate deciding factor(s)). I don't really know what to do about that one though.
Posts: 2867 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
whydidntitakethebluepill
Member
Member # 8320

 - posted      Profile for whydidntitakethebluepill   Email whydidntitakethebluepill         Edit/Delete Post 
Several people have suggested a government that wasn't controlled by politicians -- or people whose lives are dedicated to furthering their own political goals -- but the idea doesn't seem to have caught on. Why do we need politicians, who don't seem too interested in serving the good of the people, to make all our decisions?
Posts: 6 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Danzig
Member
Member # 4704

 - posted      Profile for Danzig   Email Danzig         Edit/Delete Post 
Holy shit. I agree with Jay. Seriously, why is voting at all costs (or worse, mandatory voting) a good thing? All it will do is add more randomness to the process.
Posts: 1364 | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jhai
Member
Member # 5633

 - posted      Profile for Jhai   Email Jhai         Edit/Delete Post 
We need politicians because everybody doesn't have the time or desire to inform themselves of all the legislature that's being passed everyday Congress is in session. We don't want people randomly voting on laws anymore than we want people randomly voting for politicians who will then vote on those laws. The ancient Greek citizens had time to inform themselves because there was a large percentage of the population (slaves, workers, and woman) who kept the economy going while the citizens bickered about the laws.

I think we need to find a way to funnel the people interested in serving the common good into the job of politican, rather than the power/prestige-hungry politicans we see today.

Posts: 2409 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Angiomorphism
Member
Member # 8184

 - posted      Profile for Angiomorphism           Edit/Delete Post 
i think plato had it right --> an intellectual ruling class

i agree that democracy is flawed, because even if people do vote, most of them are idiots, and why would you want to put your future in the hands of the bumbling masses? with a big enough, self-policing, intellectual ruling class, you could get rid of corruption because everyone in power would be expendable, since all the people in the ruling class would be smart enough to rule, so in order to stay in power, you would have to do what you do good (haha i know you could think of a million scenarios in which this doesnt work, but the same goes for good ol democracy) yeah.. im not sure if im totally serious about what i just said, but it would be worth a try (oh and an intellectual ruling class doesnt imply a return to the class system as as whole)

Posts: 441 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
whydidntitakethebluepill
Member
Member # 8320

 - posted      Profile for whydidntitakethebluepill   Email whydidntitakethebluepill         Edit/Delete Post 
Jhai, I think you're right. What if members of the community, served as politicians for a year or two, then went back to their regular jobs. There would be no incentive to further their political goals, since their entire political life would end within two years.
Posts: 6 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
advice for robots
Member
Member # 2544

 - posted      Profile for advice for robots           Edit/Delete Post 
But who would run the agency that selected the leaders? And who would enforce their laws? Voila, there’s where all the power-hungry would end up.
Posts: 5957 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jhai
Member
Member # 5633

 - posted      Profile for Jhai   Email Jhai         Edit/Delete Post 
Random selection (as suggested above) could do the trick. Not that I'm suggesting that as a real option but it's a fun intellectual game.

(I once read a philosophy essay that suggested (tongue-in-cheek) that we do a "child swap," where every child in the US would be moved every 4 years to a different family, with the child spending the first 8 years with its original family, as well as at least one other "swap" before he turns 20. The author thought that would greatly improve education and social conditions in places where they may be lacking)

Posts: 2409 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dan_raven
Member
Member # 3383

 - posted      Profile for Dan_raven   Email Dan_raven         Edit/Delete Post 
If you are only in a political position for a couple of years, then off to private employment, wouldn't some be tempted to push government policy, and government contracts, to thier future employees--see Boeing and the Pentagon for an example or 100.
Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Teshi
Member
Member # 5024

 - posted      Profile for Teshi   Email Teshi         Edit/Delete Post 
1. Campaign Funding Restrictions
2. At least somewhat un-biased constituency border-drawing.
3. Better, more honest and cleverer journalists.
4. A focus on preventing economic corruption rather than getting distracted by social scandal.

Posts: 8473 | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ElJay
Member
Member # 6358

 - posted      Profile for ElJay           Edit/Delete Post 
I don't believe I'm seeing this. This is Hatrack? What happened? Normally if a question even smells like it might have to do with school all the asker gets is a chorus of "Do your own homework!" But this person flat out said it was homework!

quote:
will help me zip through this assignment.

Posts: 7954 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
whydidntitakethebluepill
Member
Member # 8320

 - posted      Profile for whydidntitakethebluepill   Email whydidntitakethebluepill         Edit/Delete Post 
It's not homework. It's just something I've been thinking about for the past few weeks. I guess 'assignment' was the wrong word to use, but I would never ask for help on an assignment, especially since I'm not taking any classes right now.
Posts: 6 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2