FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » It's poison!

   
Author Topic: It's poison!
Rawrain
Member
Member # 12414

 - posted      Profile for Rawrain   Email Rawrain         Edit/Delete Post 
So, I had to say something eventually, but trying to avoid red 40, has brought distress amongst me and my girlfriend..... Not even mentioning the OTHER poisonous food dye's...

Anyone else think it's on purpose?
Red 40 is in-
Coolaid (advertised to kids)
Prenatal Vitamins (this pissed me off to the extreme, since my girlfriend was taking them (stopped after reading the lable))
Many snacks (advertised to kids)

And much more....

I don't get it!
Why do we need coolaid to be red?????
Why the hell does the prenatal vitamin need to be red?!
Why do snacks have to be red aswell?!

Why is it that these companies poison children, and get away with it...

Seriously, at one point in time the red M&M disapeared due to the problems that come along with the dye.


Unfortunetly it's not just red dye either, it's many others that are uselessly put into food with no obvious perpuse than coloring the food.

Posts: 461 | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Stephan
Member
Member # 7549

 - posted      Profile for Stephan   Email Stephan         Edit/Delete Post 
Reading the Wiki article about it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allura_Red_AC

quote:
A 2007 report from Southampton University questioned the safety of Azo food dyes in 3 year old and 8-9 year old children
quote:
The study found that increased levels of hyperactivity and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and lower IQs were observed in children.[6][7] Based on the study, the UK agency advises that cutting certain artificial colors (Sunset Yellow, Carmoisine, Tartrazine, Ponceau 4R, Quinoline Yellow WS, and Allura Red) from hyperactive children's diets might have some beneficial effects.[7]

Is it perhaps the sharing of genetic material with parents that allow their children 9 and under to partake in high amounts soda and sugary foods that causes low IQs? Perhaps the high sugary foods these dyes are typically in cause the hyperactivity?

I think moderation is key here.

Posts: 3134 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Phanto
Member
Member # 5897

 - posted      Profile for Phanto           Edit/Delete Post 
High sugar foods have not scientifically and conclusively been linked to hyperactivity.
Posts: 3060 | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rawrain
Member
Member # 12414

 - posted      Profile for Rawrain   Email Rawrain         Edit/Delete Post 
I was thinking more of the fact that, they (the dye's) are 'known' to cause problems, but they are still put into many useless things.....

Moderation is a crap, of course after a point everything is bad for you... I usually hear moderation and alcohol in the same sentence. Of which no one should be drinking in the first place.... I honestly cannot tell if I either care too much or not at all.. but bottom line is, people are typically stupid...

Main problem is ADHD's link to red 40, looking at my cousin's (I have many) they don't have any obvious ADHD signs in the family, and my cousins drank nothing but red coolaid growing up (ya bad parenting, but seriously
vitiman C +flavors+colors+sugar+water
isn't typically viewed as a bad thing expecially since children burn off the sugar pretty fast....


Anyways, I am to keep my child away from all these terrible things (ya), I have a thought in my mind that if my child were to develope any type of ADHD it would be mine, and it is not something I would want any kid to have...

Posts: 461 | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mucus
Member
Member # 9735

 - posted      Profile for Mucus           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Perhaps the high sugary foods these dyes are typically in cause the hyperactivity?
Well, they did a double blind experiment giving both sets of children fruit juice, with one group getting the additives. That basically controls for sugar.

http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research/foodcomponentsresearch/allergyresearch/t07programme/t07projectlist/t07040/

Posts: 7593 | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rawrain
Member
Member # 12414

 - posted      Profile for Rawrain   Email Rawrain         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Phanto:
High sugar foods have not scientifically and conclusively been linked to hyperactivity.

Meh, kinda wrong, when I was younger and sugar was useful, I would go into hyperactive fits if I had too much, but the effect is only temporary. The hyperactivity being talked about is ADHD :3
Posts: 461 | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Stephan
Member
Member # 7549

 - posted      Profile for Stephan   Email Stephan         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
quote:
Perhaps the high sugary foods these dyes are typically in cause the hyperactivity?
Well, they did a double blind experiment giving both sets of children fruit juice, with one group getting the additives. That basically controls for sugar.

http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research/foodcomponentsresearch/allergyresearch/t07programme/t07projectlist/t07040/

Ah, good find.
Posts: 3134 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Herblay
Member
Member # 11834

 - posted      Profile for Herblay           Edit/Delete Post 
So . . . the only study that found a problem showed a very statistically slight increase in hyperactivity in SOME children, and they recommended that it could be easily reversed in hyperactive children by avoiding the dye.

Why are you concerned? Saccharose is in almost everything you eat, and it has been shown in FAR more studies to have detrimental effects to health, including hyperactivity.

Posts: 688 | Registered: Nov 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rawrain
Member
Member # 12414

 - posted      Profile for Rawrain   Email Rawrain         Edit/Delete Post 
In Europe these dye's have been banned ._.
http://www.cspinet.org/fooddyes/
the fact that the snack company kellogs conforms show's just how desperate they are for easier money /:

Posts: 461 | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Herblay
Member
Member # 11834

 - posted      Profile for Herblay           Edit/Delete Post 
Hey, have you heard that aspartame changes into formaldehyde in your bloodstream? That's a good kick to get on. . . .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame_controversy

I feed my kids massive amounts of saccharin in their ice tea, myself. They are not hyper, of normal weight, and in the "no cavities club".

Posts: 688 | Registered: Nov 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rawrain
Member
Member # 12414

 - posted      Profile for Rawrain   Email Rawrain         Edit/Delete Post 
Ayeeee my grandma uses saccharin :OO
The container has a warning on it
"May cause cancer"
Well at least they are honest :B

I think that a lot of the food companies are trying to get kids the ADHD I mean why else use these dye's are they seriously that much cheeper than other natural colors(the kind without side effects either)??
-----------------------
The fact that there is Red 40 in prenatal vitamins proves even more suspicious than anything.

Posts: 461 | Registered: Nov 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Herblay
Member
Member # 11834

 - posted      Profile for Herblay           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Rawrain:
In Europe these dye's have been banned ._.
http://www.cspinet.org/fooddyes/
the fact that the snack company kellogs conforms show's just how desperate they are for easier money /:

Yeah, but you're quoting a lobbyist group while most of the others here are quoting the science behind the bans. A lot of non-harmful or minimally harmful substances have been banned.

Have you read the articles linked above?

Posts: 688 | Registered: Nov 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kwea
Member
Member # 2199

 - posted      Profile for Kwea   Email Kwea         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Phanto:
High sugar foods have not scientifically and conclusively been linked to hyperactivity.

Latest research actually counters that argument completely, with the findings that there was no difference in activity levels between the high sugar and control groups.
Posts: 15082 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kwea
Member
Member # 2199

 - posted      Profile for Kwea   Email Kwea         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Herblay:
Hey, have you heard that aspartame changes into formaldehyde in your bloodstream? That's a good kick to get on. . . .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame_controversy

I feed my kids massive amounts of saccharin in their ice tea, myself. They are not hyper, of normal weight, and in the "no cavities club".

quote:
With regards to formaldehyde, it is rapidly converted in the body, and the amounts of formaldehyde from the metabolism of aspartame is trivial when compared to the amounts produced routinely by the human body and from other foods and drugs.[4] Ingesting aspartame at the 90th percentile of intake would produce 25 times less methanol than would be considered toxic
quote:
Reviews have found no association between aspartame and cancer. These reviews have looked at numerous carcinogenicity studies in animals, epidemiologic studies in humans, as well as in vitro genotoxicity studies. These studies have found no significant evidence that aspartame causes cancer in animals, damages the genome, or causes cancer in humans at doses currently used.[4][47][49] This position is supported by multiple regulatory agencies like the FDA[56] and EFSA as well as scientific bodies such as the National Cancer Institute.[55]
Concern about possible carcinogenic properties of aspartame was originally raised and popularized in the mainstream media by John Olney in 1970s and again in 1996 by suggesting that aspartame may be related to brain tumors. Reviews have found that these concerns were flawed, due to reliance on the ecological fallacy[57] and the purported mechanism of causing tumors being unlikely to actually cause cancer. Independent agencies such as the FDA and National Cancer Institute have reanalyzed multiple studies based on these worries and found no association between aspartame and brain cancer.[

quote:
One review noted the Ramazzini Foundation relied on science by press conference with the release of results through the media before being published in a proper peer-reviewed journal, helping fuel the controversy and publicity about the study in the media
From the same link......
Posts: 15082 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kwea
Member
Member # 2199

 - posted      Profile for Kwea   Email Kwea         Edit/Delete Post 
I bet the same websites you get your info from say that vaccines cause autism too. [Roll Eyes]
Posts: 15082 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Samprimary
Member
Member # 8561

 - posted      Profile for Samprimary   Email Samprimary         Edit/Delete Post 
If this is supposed to be about crap that's bad for you, you can stop talking about aspartame and start talking about bisphenol-a, the controversy du jour which actually has some meat on its bones.
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Herblay
Member
Member # 11834

 - posted      Profile for Herblay           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Kwea:
I bet the same websites you get your info from say that vaccines cause autism too. [Roll Eyes]

Uhm . . . I was being sarcastic with the whole asparatame link. That's why I posted the Wikipedia.

Cool, though. My step-sister is one of those new-age healing nuts that had been arguing against her niece getting surgery for severe scoliosis for years. Her mom just got her the surgery, and my step-sister freaked out. She was going to heal the girl with massage therapy and good intentions.

Ehh, I take my health advice from the government and base it on actual science [Big Grin] . All of these nut-job scare tactics are for the birds. Even a few reasonably safe OTC's are banned because of over-cautious government (ephedrine, spice, etc).

[ January 05, 2011, 05:54 PM: Message edited by: Herblay ]

Posts: 688 | Registered: Nov 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Phanto
Member
Member # 5897

 - posted      Profile for Phanto           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Phanto:
High sugar foods have not scientifically and conclusively been linked to hyperactivity.

Latest research actually counters that argument completely, with the findings that there was no difference in activity levels between the high sugar and control groups.


Not sure where we are disagreeing.

Me: Sugar ! link to hyperactivity
You: You're wrong, there is ! difference between activity of high and control sugar groups

Posts: 3060 | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2