posted
Toward the end of his life, my father composed papers that no eye has ever read. Time, he wrote, was a living entity, an endangered sentience that his trawlers would kill bit by bit. And when time died, so would all sentience, everywhere, every-when.
I never expected to have a temporal encounter, or serve as a mediator to save humanity, not to mention time itself. When my calling came, there I was, huddled in my spot, a scrap of cardboard beside the dumpster. The cardboard had made a nice box once. It didn’t take long for it to fall apart, just another thing I’d ruined. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Okay, this was Second Options. I've gone back and redid the opening, yet again. I'm trying to show the speculative element on the first page, and it's kind of an infodump, but I'm hoping it all goes with: The first paragraph's free. Maybe not?
As I'm currently in the middle revamping this story, I'm just interesting in the opening for now...
[This message has been edited by ChrisOwens (edited February 20, 2006).]
posted
It's a nice effort to tie the concept to the scene, but it seems to raise an irony that you don't exploit.
His father died a bit of a marginalized nut. Here the son is living on the remains of a cardboard box by a dumpster. His father constructed a theory about the transient nature of time itself, and this guy has reason to contemplate the ephemeral nature of his own house...granted, one made of cardboard.
If you could interweave those two in a way that both starts and ends with the current conditions of the narrator, I think it would work a little smoother.
posted
I was thrown off by this statement: "my father composed papers that no eye has ever read", yet your narrator goes on to describe what is IN those papers. An obvious contradiction, and one that comes across as an inaccurate choice of words rather than an intriguing mystery. It boils down to a POV violation... if no eye has ever read the papers, how would your POV character know about them?
If it's a trick, and they were somehow read WITHOUT an eye, you need to let the reader in on the joke immediately.
Don't be shy about revealing the speculative element here. You are better off hooking us earlier than you meant to, rather than risk turning us away because you aren't clear and we chalk that up to poor storytelling skills.
I sense a good hook about to happen, but it's not there yet.
posted
Maybe his father told him about them??!?!? Or perhaps he saw them with something besides his eye?!?!!
But really, perhaps he is just speaking from an older version of himself that already knows the information, which seems to be pretty clear to me. Maybe you should just make it a little clearer though. I like it personally, especially that second sentence--has a nice ring to it.
Hopefully the contradiction would be one that some would note in the back of their mind, but not stop them from reading. There’s a truth to the statement that becomes apparent by the end of the story.
"Time, he wrote, was a living entity, an endangered sentience ... And when time died, so would all sentience, everywhere, every-when."
The idea of time as a living thing that can die -- and take the universe with it -- has some very unsettling implications for me. I think it's a good hook.
The second paragraph could use a little work, as per some of the suggestions above but I feel it has potential.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
