posted
Firefly poster gets professor in hot water. For those who don't want to follow a link to HuffPo (and I wouldn't blame you...wait, here's Reason's take for those of a different aesthetic bent) the upshot is a theater Professor at UW-Stout posted a picture showing Mal with the following quote from the pilot episode of Firefly: "You don't know me, son, so let me explain this to you once: If I ever kill you, you'll be awake. You'll be facing me. And you'll be armed."
Campus police took down the poster, explaining it constituted a threat of violence. In response, the professor posted a new picture, this time labeled "Warning Fascism: Fascism can cause blunt trauma and/or violent death. Keep fascism away from children and pets" along with a cartoon depiction of an individual being beaten by a policeman in riot gear. The police took this down as well, explaining it constituted a further threat of violence against the community and set up a disciplinary hearing for the professor with the university administration.
The resulting media focus has caused the administration to cancel the meeting, although the University President continues to assert that the police's actions were justified and not a violation of the Professor's 1st amendment rights. The quote in the thread title is an abridgment of the President's statement on the issue:
quote:This was not an act of censorship. This was an act of sensitivity to and care for our shared community, and was intended to maintain a campus climate in which everyone can feel welcome, safe and secure.
posted
The professor's an idiot, too, though; he doesn't have any First Amendment right to hang posters in his office.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Proving once again the potency of the Brown Coat community, just about the only thing we can't do is the get show back in production.
But just me personally, I like that quote just fine but it certainly is not my first choice to put on the wall. A picture of Kaylee wearing her silly dress and the quote "Girl was crying Cinderella tears. Shoulda seen her, when I said she could have that layer cake she's wearin'" would be my preference.
Posts: 2302 | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TomDavidson: The professor's an idiot, too, though; he doesn't have any First Amendment right to hang posters in his office.
I agree. But in the battle of these two idiots, I think the stupidity award here must go to the woman who thought removing a "boo fascism" was ever going to lead to anything good. I mean, that's media gold right there.
Posts: 2409 | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, the woman is just some low level flunky and it's not hard to imagine that with emotions running high in some tit-for-tat that this kind of thing can occur.
I think the real failure is that the leadership "Chancellor Sorensen, Provost Julie Furst-Bowe and Vice Chancellor Ed Nieskes" sat down, had ample time to think about it, and with all their training and distance from the professor decided that it would be a good idea to contribute, well, to the media gold.
Posts: 7593 | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Who was the initial threat of violence to, exactly? The far-flung ancestors of future Alliance doctors?
Posts: 17164 | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mucus: Well, the woman is just some low level flunky and it's not hard to imagine that with emotions running high in some tit-for-tat that this kind of thing can occur.
Low level flunky? She's the Campus Chief of Police! I mean, I guess that does just put her one step above Meter Maid, but she's got "chief" right there in her job title.
Posts: 3580 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TomDavidson: The professor's an idiot, too, though; he doesn't have any First Amendment right to hang posters in his office.
Is it the professor who's making the first amendment argument, or is it just the university president?
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
At least one of the articles I read indicated the University did it after consulting with their legal department about the possible outcome of hostile environment lawsuits. The idea being that students might feel threatened by the poster, and could bring suit against the University as a result. Which is a real concern for a University, I guess. You don't want the cost and the bad press of students saying they felt threatened by their professors.
Yet another reason to bemoan the increasing litigiousness of American society.
Posts: 2926 | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TomDavidson: The professor's an idiot, too, though; he doesn't have any First Amendment right to hang posters in his office.
Is it the professor who's making the first amendment argument, or is it just the university president?
<edit>My readings of that short email chain make me considerably more sympathetic to the police and less to the professor. The Chief seems to have interacted politely and professionally, while the Professor is belligerent and superficial in his criticism. Not that that affects the rightness or wrongness of the individuals' actions, but I can tell you whom I'd rather have a conversation with.</edit>
Posts: 2926 | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's kind of funny what junk you can dig up on the Internet. You can find the police chief's Facebook, their LinkedIn, their phone numbers in that linked set of emails.
You can even find the prof's ratemyprof profile including this gem
quote:Possibly the worst teacher i have ever had. He is very similar to Hitler due to the fact that he chooses the topics for speeches for you, and expects you to be a state champion speaker. he is horrible do not take him, I regret taking his class.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
