FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Discussions About Orson Scott Card » Trademark/ Copyright Issues

   
Author Topic: Trademark/ Copyright Issues
scottneb
Member
Member # 676

 - posted      Profile for scottneb           Edit/Delete Post 
If, when reading a book and a character comes in, my mind puts a Trademarked character in his place, do I have to pay the holder of the Trademark?

What about the writer of the original character? Do I owe him damages? Did I defame the character?

Should I cut my losses and live the rest of my life on the run?

[ May 09, 2005, 04:20 PM: Message edited by: scottneb ]

Posts: 1660 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dagonee
Member
Member # 5818

 - posted      Profile for Dagonee           Edit/Delete Post 
I think you should get your affairs in order and get ready to spend some time in Oz - the HBO one, not the Baum one.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Orson Scott Card
Administrator
Member # 209

 - posted      Profile for Orson Scott Card           Edit/Delete Post 
No, you don't have to pay the holder of the trademark. You have to stop letting your mind put other people's characters in your story AT ALL.

It's permission you have to ask for. You can't just decide to use someone else's creation and then pay a fee.

And even if the character is not trademarked - because few of us go to that expense - it's generally considered bad form to use other people's characters, except for purposes of satire. And even then it's a little iffy.

So whenever your unconscious mind puts someone else's character in your work, slap that unconscious mind silly and go back to work and invent a character of your own. It will ALWAYS work out better in your story. Mostly because you don't really KNOW enough about the other writer's character to be able to use that character effectively and accurately in your own story. The only characters you truly know are your own creations - because you get to decide what is true about them.

Posts: 2005 | Registered: Jul 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sid Meier
Member
Member # 6965

 - posted      Profile for Sid Meier   Email Sid Meier         Edit/Delete Post 
I know I didnt ask the original question but that is good advice if I ever get around to writing a story again or making an rpg. thanks Mr Card sir.
Posts: 1567 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
Um....Never mind. [Smile]
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sid Meier
Member
Member # 6965

 - posted      Profile for Sid Meier   Email Sid Meier         Edit/Delete Post 
I dont undertand.
Posts: 1567 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Avicus
Member
Member # 7652

 - posted      Profile for Avicus   Email Avicus         Edit/Delete Post 
Additional to what Mr. Card said:
Let's say after you contact the holder and ask for permission to use the character and agree on a fee, there's still not gaurantee that you'll be able to use it. They have to do a background check to make sure you know what you're doing and have had experiance in this type of work before to begin with. No experiance equals not a chance in hell. Second, you can't gaurantee yourself that your character will fall through. After editing it countless time there is always the chance that you may find the character is better left out or given a very small role. So you have to ask yourself is it worth the time and trouble that comes along with it when you could easily make your own character and develop it to be what you want.

Posts: 51 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kaioshin00
Member
Member # 3740

 - posted      Profile for kaioshin00   Email kaioshin00         Edit/Delete Post 
Hmm. Seemed to me like scottneb was joking.
Posts: 2756 | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, he was clearly joking. But I dislike explaining someone else's joke even more than I dislike explaining my own. [Smile]
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Portabello
Member
Member # 7710

 - posted      Profile for Portabello   Email Portabello         Edit/Delete Post 
Before the edit, didn't the original post say "writing" instead of "reading"? I didn't realize it was a joke at first, either.
Posts: 751 | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
I have no idea. But he edited it three minutes after writing it, and well before anyone replied.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Orson Scott Card
Administrator
Member # 209

 - posted      Profile for Orson Scott Card           Edit/Delete Post 
I thought that Scottneb's question was serious, and he was only joking at the end of his post.
Posts: 2005 | Registered: Jul 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
msquared
Member
Member # 4484

 - posted      Profile for msquared   Email msquared         Edit/Delete Post 
I will explain Tom's joke.

It was in reference to Sid Meier commenting on using other character names, or in this case game developers.

msquared

Posts: 1907 | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tater
Member
Member # 7035

 - posted      Profile for Tater           Edit/Delete Post 
I have a question..
I tried to save one of my pictures as my AIM icon, and it said "Please make sure you have the right to use and distribute the contents of this file."

It's just a picture.. of a cat..
can i do that?

Posts: 925 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tater
Member
Member # 7035

 - posted      Profile for Tater           Edit/Delete Post 
*cough*
Posts: 925 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
scottneb
Member
Member # 676

 - posted      Profile for scottneb           Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I was joking. My thought was, what if (in my mind) Ender looks like Han Solo. I never meant it seriously. I'm sorry for the inconvenience, Mr. Card. Maybe I should consider putting smilies in the post.

I edited out some of my bad grammar from the original post. It's mainly the same as the original.

Posts: 1660 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
scottneb
Member
Member # 676

 - posted      Profile for scottneb           Edit/Delete Post 
Tater, it depends on who took the picture.
Posts: 1660 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mothertree
Member
Member # 4999

 - posted      Profile for mothertree   Email mothertree         Edit/Delete Post 
"Ender looks like Han Solo"

Dude, are you crazy? I'm not sure what Ender looks like, but I'm sure I'll recognize him when we meet.

Posts: 2010 | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Orson Scott Card
Administrator
Member # 209

 - posted      Profile for Orson Scott Card           Edit/Delete Post 
The photographer who took the picture holds the copyright, and can sue for unauthorized use.

At the same time, smart people know that when you make an image visible to others, it enhances the reputation of the originator. So if you give CREDIT for the foto to the fotografer, you are actually doing him good, and SOME fotogs understand this. However, some don't - and you ARE in the wrong, legally, if you appropriate someone else's image without permission.

And it doesn't help if you whip out your digital camera and take a picture of the other guy's kitten picture. Any means of reproduction is off limits, if you're going to respect copyright.

That's how the law is, and how the publishing industry functions ...

Posts: 2005 | Registered: Jul 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kaioshin00
Member
Member # 3740

 - posted      Profile for kaioshin00   Email kaioshin00         Edit/Delete Post 
So do you automatically have the copyright over things your write, create, etc., or do you have to register it somewhere? Can no one reproduce the contents of this very post without my consent?
Posts: 2756 | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dagonee
Member
Member # 5818

 - posted      Profile for Dagonee           Edit/Delete Post 
There is no registration requirement to have a copyright, although before you can take action you must register. This is easy to do, and it allows you to take action for violations made prior to the registration.

Copyright attaches to the author (or the author's employer for works made for hire) at the moment the work is fixed in a tangible medium. There's not even a notice requirement, although using the (c) mark will preclude someone from using the innocent infringement defense.

Note that copyright does not prevent all reproduction - fair use applies. This is a VERY complicated concept, but it's why I can quote portions of a news article and then comment on it in a forum.

Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
teoivan
Member
Member # 8049

 - posted      Profile for teoivan   Email teoivan         Edit/Delete Post 
Be generous. Yeh but not so much. I am not sure that there is something so wondreful that everyone want to have it thats why it is not necessery to hold the rights for everything what is yours.
Posts: 22 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dagonee
Member
Member # 5818

 - posted      Profile for Dagonee           Edit/Delete Post 
Copyright and patent law are based on an economic incentive model. The Constitution specifically states that the justification for both is that granting a temporary monopoly will encourage people to create works of authorship and/or inventions.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tern
Member
Member # 7429

 - posted      Profile for tern   Email tern         Edit/Delete Post 
So just out of curiosity, if someone makes a Master of Orion type game and puts in a Ringworld, would they be in violation of Larry Niven's copyrights?
Posts: 561 | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dagonee
Member
Member # 5818

 - posted      Profile for Dagonee           Edit/Delete Post 
Tricky. The test for this is called the abstraction test. All points of similarity between the original work and the new work are compared. Then unprotected elements from that list are discarded. For example, the concept of two people falling in love is an idea that may not be copyrighted. The story of a man named Romeo and a woman named Juliet from feuding families who declare their love in a balcony scene and end up killing themselves because of a failed attempt to fake the man's death is probably protected (or would be if it weren't already public domain).

So to answer your question, it would depend on how similar the planet is to Ringworld. An artificial world built in a ring around the sun would probably be OK. The more features or characters that match up with Niven's story, the more likely it would be to infringe.

Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2