FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Discussions About Orson Scott Card » Phrenology

   
Author Topic: Phrenology
Stephan
Member
Member # 7549

 - posted      Profile for Stephan   Email Stephan         Edit/Delete Post 
I was reading November's Discovery magazine and came across a picture of a skull from the 19th century owned by Napoleon III's physician to study and teach phrenology. Got to show it to my fiance who just finished reading Seventh Son, not believing the practice was real.

I think the picture is fascinating:

Click Here to see

Posts: 3134 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
antichris
Member
Member # 8785

 - posted      Profile for antichris   Email antichris         Edit/Delete Post 
My personal favorite is in Pratchett's Discworld books (forget which exactly) where Sam Vimes runs through the office of a Retro-Phrenologist.

Stands to reason, of course, that if you can read personality traits and other things by examining bumps on the head, you can certainly induce personality traits and such by creating new bumps on the head.

Usually with a large mallet.

Posts: 5 | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
[ROFL]

Sadly, phrenology has been used to lampoon psychology ever since, despite the progress made in the field. When phrenology was in vogue, physicians were still bleeding patients and worrying about "humors."

Heck, the germ theory of disease wasn't even universally believed by physicians (despite the knowledge since the late 17th century that microbes existed in samples from diseased patients.)

Ah well. phrenology persited into the mid 1800's as a respected "science" before being discredited.

The history of science and medicine, especially as it relates to the mind and personality, is full of stuff that is just laughable in retrospect.

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ClaudiaTherese
Member
Member # 923

 - posted      Profile for ClaudiaTherese           Edit/Delete Post 
But don't go dissing on leeches, now. That's some high-end stuff in plastics these days.
Posts: 14017 | Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Storm Saxon
Member
Member # 3101

 - posted      Profile for Storm Saxon           Edit/Delete Post 
Oh, here we go with that PC bs. 'Don't dis leeches! Don't dis hookworms! Don't dis Karl Rove!' My Bob, you bleeding-heart liberals make me sick!
Posts: 13123 | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Storm Saxon
Member
Member # 3101

 - posted      Profile for Storm Saxon           Edit/Delete Post 
Sick, I tell you!
Posts: 13123 | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Orson Scott Card
Administrator
Member # 209

 - posted      Profile for Orson Scott Card           Edit/Delete Post 
It's funny now to realize that while you can't tell much from external bumps, in fact the brain DOES shape the skull inside (as the skull shapes the brain) and certainly human brains do differ from other animals' brains in the relative size of different brain areas ... which has an influence on the shape of the skull. The phrenologists were rightish in theory, sort of, but hopelessly unable to access the information they sought through the methods available to them.
Posts: 2005 | Registered: Jul 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Orson Scott Card
Administrator
Member # 209

 - posted      Profile for Orson Scott Card           Edit/Delete Post 
Certainly by looking at (or toward) the physical brain, they were coming closer to finding the source of madness than Freud was by looking at your mother's childhood treatment of you.
Posts: 2005 | Registered: Jul 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Icarus
Member
Member # 3162

 - posted      Profile for Icarus   Email Icarus         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm not a fan of Freud—and his harmful, absurd excesses—but if you're saying that all mental illness is rooted in physiology, and none of it in experience, I don't agree.
Posts: 13680 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Survivor
Member
Member # 233

 - posted      Profile for Survivor   Email Survivor         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, he didn't say that. He just said that looking at the brain was more of a right direction in the search for madness than what Freud was doing.

Although, to be fair, Freud was more interested in the workings of "normal" minds, I think. Or at least, the workings of a mind within a physiologically normal brain, it seems a bit of a stretch to call the Freudian mind normal just because the brain is undamaged.

My own analysis of the concepts involved suggests that a behavior pattern resulting entirely from a physically normal brain cannot be "illness" unless we accept the term as being rather vague in actual meaning. Which I think it is, really.

But then again, Card used the less popular but much more precise term "madness".

Posts: 763 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2