Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Discussions About Orson Scott Card » Keeper of Dreams-Views on 'Freemarket' v. 'Capitalism'

Author Topic: Keeper of Dreams-Views on 'Freemarket' v. 'Capitalism'
New Member
Member # 12223

 - posted      Profile for sonofjefferson           Edit/Delete Post 
In reading "Keeper of Dream", I found the inter-use of the terms 'freemarket' and 'capitalism' disheartening. The Founders based our government upon righteous ideals. The economy was one based upon personal freedoms, a free market-thence freemarket. This ideal has been abused and destroyed. No longer is there a freemarket, instead we now have a capital-istic economy.

The differences may seem slight, yet it is the difference between cooperative consecration, and communism. On the one hand everything is being consecrated to a higher power, and then--by common consent--those material goods are redistributed for the good of the whole and the good of the individual.

On the other hand, Communism takes away all goods, for the common good, and then redistributes to the group. Power is usurped and force is the means of this leveling. As someone infamous once said, "Send me, I will take all of these, and not one will be lost, but give me the glory."

Even though the differences may be slight, the results are infinitely divergent.

My hope is that the clarity which OSC brings to the characters of his books can be enlarged to include the mundane. As always,

~A huge fan~

Posts: 1 | Registered: Nov 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Member # 8561

 - posted      Profile for Samprimary   Email Samprimary         Edit/Delete Post 
The Founders based our government upon righteous ideals.
You would have to explain what you mean by this, both overall and in terms of market economics.
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Member # 8122

 - posted      Profile for Clumpy           Edit/Delete Post 
I have to agree. Adam Smith never intended nor could have predicted the ridiculous, exploitative system we have now. Originally even in the U.S. it was illegal to have an interstate business until the megarich found out ways to subvert the rule. It's been said, and I agree, that Marx was nearly completely wrong about the benefits or feasibility of Communism, but he was completely right about capitalism.

A government that doesn't regulate capitalism isn't protecting freedom - it's just permitting those with power and money to aggregate even more and set the rules.

Posts: 127 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2