posted
Well I strongly dislike Bush and Kerry (for reasons not really applicable to this thread); and I've decided that voting for either someone who I do not want in charge of my country comes too close to lying for my concious, so now I need to pick someone else... but who? The only 3rd party candiate I really know much about is Nader, and I don't want to vote for him either; so I'm asking the well informed, highly oppinionated crowd here, who else is there? Is there any good sites to reasearch their stances, or hear what they have to say? Who is it that I can vote for (besides writing in Lieberman or somnething, which I would feel really lame doing since he's already declined to run, if only since he was beaten by Kerry)?
posted
Sadly, none of the major third-party candidates are any better; they're all pretty much whack-jobs.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Darn! It was on birth control, you seemed to think I was intelligent and I felt bad leaving you with my poor explenation on it (after that one thread) and making you stop thinking that (because who want's Tom to think they're stupid? ) but I didn't want to start a big to-do at Hatrack about it. Anyways... umm.. just pretend you got it and it was really intelligent and you don't have to lower your opinion of me.
posted
I still contend that if the option "none of the above" was listed on the ballot, it would win this election (and the one four years ago).
There are no viable third party candidates. Unfortuantely, there are also no viable major party candidates either.
Posts: 279 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Um. Honestly, you're probably better off writing somebody in. None of the "viable" third-party candidates are worth voting for, and none of the other ones are any more likely to get more votes than a write-in.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Several of his positions appeal to me in theory, but they're too extreme to be useful. I think government strangles a lot of businesses with overregulation, but some regulations are necessary, and he doesn't seem to want to face up to it.
Posts: 1114 | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well I give up. I've looked through this whole list and found absoltuley nothing and no one who I actually want as president. I officialy have no clue as to what I'm doing come Novemember.
posted
You do realize that no matter what third-party candidate you choose, your vote will essentially be helping re-elect Bush, right? Much like a vote for Nader was a vote against Gore in 2000, a vote for pretty much any third party is going to be a vote against Kerry. I'm positive the next election is going to be close like the last one was.
Posts: 72 | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
A person should assess as much about the situation possible, imagine most of the possible outcomes, make a list of the countries biggest problems, think about our relations with the rest of the world, and then go with your heart, mind and soul.
<T>
I think W is all about War and Tax Cuts. I believe his buddies make great profits from war. I do not think he's smart enough for the job.
Kerr is not a genius either. He's also a super rich dude. But, in a time of World War III, I'd rather have a guy who gave his blood, sweat and tears as a soldier. He was in the middle of War. He knows the ramifications and price families must pay for the old rich mens wars. Plus, our ability to have good relations without countries that aren't tony blair land and mexico improve by 1000%.
If you want to cast a third party vote, vote for me.
THOR for President 2004!
Posts: 2752 | Registered: Feb 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Vote for me. My death eaters should make short work of the terrorists, dictators, and criminals. Of course, they will also make short work of grandmothers, children, and cute puppies. Hey, you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet.
I also promise not to torture anyone for information. We have much more efficient ways, specificially veritaserum. No, I will only torture people for fun.
So, Voldemort for Dark Lor- I mean, President of the United States. Well, I guess some people would consider them the same thing. Take the dark mark today and show your patriotism!
Posts: 3 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I voted for Nader in 2000. It was a vote for Nader, not Bush.
At the time (1999), neither major candidate was doing anything but paying lipservice to me. They kept talking about lockboxes and prescription drug reform for retirees.
Neither side was touching on anything that would fire me up. While it looks bad now, I felt that at worst, GWB would be about the same as GHWB, mediocre, but serviceable. In hindsight I was wrong, but you can't judge my decision in hindsight, because I didn't have it when I went into the booth.
I don't generally fall into the strict party lines that the "Other Party", whoever that is, is the Enemy. As a result, I wasn't going to knee-jerk vote for Gore out of some idea of being part of the team. The parties are there to make theyir best case TO US, not expect me to vote for them as a default.
Heck, if the Libertarians had a moderate wing, I might even vote for them!
This year, I'll likely be voting for Kerry; partially because Bush has proven himself (to me) to be a less than mediocre president, partially because Nader is banging on the same drum, he isn't adapting to the new climate.
posted
Hey Voldie, how do you respond to the charges of being weak on environmental issues? Cthulhu, the other Dark candidate, has a well known platform position of mastication on crime and grandmothers? This seems much more ecologically conscious than yours.
quote:But, in a time of World War III, I'd rather have a guy who gave his blood, sweat and tears as a soldier.
Hey man, World War III is over. And if you missed the coldness of it, you sure as heck will have trouble detecting the raging WWIV that is being fought silently all around us.
I'm bracing for world war 5...
Posts: 1870 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hey! On that site Jeni posted, it shows there is a Kansan running for President! As the "Peace and Freedom Party" candidate..
Oooo....
quote:The "Leonard Peltier for President" campaign seems to be an attempt to garner more publicity for an imprisoned cause celebre of the international progressive movement. Peltier, a prominent Native American activist, has been serving a life sentence in federal prison for the murder of two FBI agents in South Dakota in 1975, when they came onto the reservation.
Guess I definately won't be voting for this fellow Kansan come election day! How awful!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
What was it about?
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
) but I didn't want to start a big to-do at Hatrack about it. Anyways... umm.. just pretend you got it and it was really intelligent and you don't have to lower your opinion of me. ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Dont Know]](graemlins/dontknow.gif)
![[ROFL]](graemlins/rofl.gif)
![[Taunt]](graemlins/taunt.gif)
No wait... ummm... I'll get back to you on that. In the mean time, thanks for the link. ![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Grumble]](graemlins/grumble.gif)
