quote: WASHINGTON (AP) -- What would it take to get someone to turn in one of those spammers who send millions of unwanted e-mails? At least $100,000, the Federal Trade Commission figures.
Six-figure incentives are the only way to persuade people to disclose the identity of co-workers, friends and others they know are responsible for flooding online mailboxes with unsolicited pitches for prescription drugs, weight loss plans and other products, according to an agency report Thursday.
The commission said a government-funded reward system could work if the payoff was between $100,000 and $250,000 -- higher than rewards in most high-profile criminal and terrorism cases. For example, the FBI pays $50,000 for tips leading to the arrests of most of its top 10 fugitives.
posted
So...any spammers over here? I'm just asking because...you know...I'm curious. The money? Bah...didn't even notice it. Posts: 1785 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's kinda depressing that I don't even have the opportunity to be a sell-out. I'm just a sell-out wannabe. ;(
Posts: 143 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Now, if Arthur Miller were writing Death of a Salesman today, Willy Loman wouldn't be killing himself so that his family could get the insurance check. Instead, he'd be setting himself up as a spammer so that his family could turn him in and claim the reward money...
posted
nice to know that being a serial killer will be easier to get away with than trying to sell you a pill to make your (pick a part) bigger.
is there a reward for turning in people who download mp3's illegaly? if the recording industry sponsered one, that would make more sense than this.
as annoying as deleting 80 crap messages a day, and constantly restructuring my filters is, i would rather see this kind of money spent on, oh, just about anything. like, maybe education? or road work? or something.
(was that the response you were hoping for?)
[ September 20, 2004, 02:59 PM: Message edited by: the master ]
Posts: 157 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
If that last line was directed at me, then my answer is, I wasn't hoping for any particular response. Though, I obviously disagree with you in this particular instance, I have to ask, do you really dislike rewards for turning people in in general because the money is ill spent, or because it turns people into stooges for the state with all that implies?
Posts: 13123 | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
What if it was a Spamming Murderer? You know, sent out emails and if you didn't send it to 10 people in the next 10 minutes, he'd come and kill you?
Posts: 51 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
And other than having a good heart, what would prevent a hacker from hijacking your machine, filling it with all the malware development code and tests as well as the malware itself, setting your computer to spam, then turning you in for the reward?
The reason I ask is that there is a college student in jail right now for eco"terrorism" -- arson at a SouthernCalifornia SUV dealership -- solely on the basis of emails claiming responsibility tracked to his computer. My problem is: what CalTech student is so oblivious as to how computers/networks work that s/he would send emails from her/his own computer without even bothering to cover the trail by spoofing?
Posts: 8501 | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Evil]](graemlins/evil.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Hat]](graemlins/hat.gif)
