Author
Topic: Oddly Enough - Reuters
Turgan
Member
Member # 6697
posted September 24, 2004 11:51 AM
HOLY CRAP! THAT'S AWESOME!!!!
Posts: 529 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
Farmgirl
Member
Member # 5567
posted September 24, 2004 11:51 AM
So Edgar Allen Poe can't live in California?? (wasn't that the rumor about him???) FG
Posts: 9538 | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged |
mr_porteiro_head
Member
Member # 4644
posted September 24, 2004 11:53 AM
No, Poe can't live in California. He's dead, you know. But now he could safely rest in California.
Posts: 16551 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
Telperion the Silver
Member
Member # 6074
posted September 24, 2004 12:57 PM
Um... I know it's sick and all.. but eight YEARS?? That's really really steep for a basically victimless crime. Rapists get only, what, 5 years or so?
Posts: 4953 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
Annie
Member
Member # 295
posted September 24, 2004 12:59 PM
Ewwwwww. Wish I hadn't read that.
Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999
| IP: Logged |
Sara Sasse
Member
Member # 6804
posted September 24, 2004 01:03 PM
Yeah. Ewwwwww ... About time for it to be addressed, sounds like.
Posts: 2919 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
CStroman
Member
Member # 6872
posted September 24, 2004 01:04 PM
Honestly, I have a few thoughts about the constitutionality of this law. Did this law in fact give RIGHTS to a corpse? That could have HUGE ramifications on other RIGHTS. If not, then what is the classification of a corpse that gives it a status other than "property". I could see if when a person dies, their corpse becomes an item of "property" ownded by their family/relatives. But what if that person is homeless or has no kin? What is to say that a man/woman having sex with a rubber blow up doll is ok, but having sex with a dead corpse is not? Just some interesting thoughts to ponder.
Posts: 1533 | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |