posted
This seems like a really silly thing to do, to me. They bring out a Republican and the Republican ALWAYS says their guy won. Then they bring out a Democrat who ALWAYS says their guy won.
How is that supposed to be informative? It's a totally meaningless exchange, yet every channel seems to do this right after the debate is done.
Why not interview people who might say something we don't already know they will say?
Posts: 2432 | Registered: Feb 2001
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
