posted
Since I missed all the game up to Sorenson recovering the onside kick, what was so good about it?
Posts: 959 | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
I was there, and it was crap. The crowd spent more time booing and yelling about bad calls than anything else.
Maybe someone can explain to me why Driver's catch in the endzone toward the end of the game wasn't a touchdown. He caught the ball, his feet hit the ground, then it was stripped out of his hands. How much more control of the ball does a person need for a touchdown?
Posts: 4292 | Registered: Jan 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
The announcers kept saying that he didn't have control of it for long enough--he only got one foot on the ground when he looked like he had possession, then it got stripped.
posted
I am also a bit curious why it took so long for the officials to decide to eject Darius from the game. They called the penalty, and it wasn't until like five minutes later and a lot of arguing with Green Bay folk that they finally sent him off the field. I'd have thought that was a no-brainer.
Posts: 4292 | Registered: Jan 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
What Traveler said. There are two elements: You have to make a catch, and the ball has to break the plane.
To make the catch, control and two feet on the ground are required. I believe they can touch in succession, but I'm not sure. Once you make the catch, you possess the ball.
To score a touchdown, the ball must be in a player's possession while any part of it is across the plane. So if you have possession and enter the end zone, a touchdown is scored the instant the ball breaks the plane, even if you drop it immediately afterwards or no part of your body touches the end zone.
If you are catching the ball inside the end zone, the touchdown is scored the instant you have possession. And you don't have possession until both feet touch while you have control of the ball.