posted
I know you had a thread about this already, but I was so excited to see your name I had to start a new one.
On page 3 of The West Australian today - a half page article entitled "Clint fires mercy killing row: America's moral outrage over Eastwood's Million Dollar Baby expected to spill into Australia"
From the 7th paragraph in:
quote: "Any movie that sends a message that having a spinal cord injury is a fate worse than death is a movie that concerns us tremendously" Marcie Roth, executive director of America's National Spinal Cord Injury association told the New York Times. There was an even angrier response from Chicago-based activist group Not Dead Yet, which picketed the film last month. "The movie is a corny melodramatic assault on people with disabilities", wrote Stephen Drake on the group's website. "It plays out killing as a romantic fantasy and gives emotional life to the "better dead than disabled" mindset lurking in the heart of the typical (read: non-disabled) audience member."
I'd say you managed to get your review some attention.
I'll let you know the response to the article if you wish. Also, if you keep clippings or anything I can send the page to you.
Posts: 4393 | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
i just went through the house looking for a copy of the West Australian to see the article but didn't find one... congrats though!
Posts: 46 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
So, then, this would the meme? (the statement part)
quote:"The movie is a corny melodramatic assault on people with disabilities", wrote Stephen Drake on the group's website. "It plays out killing as a romantic fantasy and gives emotional life to the "better dead than disabled" mindset lurking in the heart of the typical (read: non-disabled) audience member."
Did I really write that?
It does seem to be the one statement - out of many made by me and others - that is getting the most play, although "vendetta" is running a healthy second.
Posts: 4344 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
Also, I believe any sufficiently similar rephrasing would still be considered the same meme -- unless/until it mutates enough to no longer be recognizable (again following the gene analogy).
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |