quote: Sorry, boys. You can't even count on uber-skank Paris Hilton to give it up these days.
The sexy socialite, who's had a string of high-profile romances and once starred in a sex tape that was leaked on the Net, claims she is not as promiscuous as everyone assumes.
"People think I sleep with everyone, but I'm not like that," the Simple Life star says in British GQ's September issue. "Kissing is all I do."
In fact, Hilton tells the magazine she's only ever slept with two men in her entire life.
"The reason so many of my relationships don't work is guys are like, 'Hey what's going on? It's been like four months and I'm only getting a kiss here,'" she explains. "I feel good about it. I like the way guys go crazy when they can't have sex with you. If he can't have you, he stays interested, the moment he has you he's gone. Unless he is really in love with you."
In fact, Hilton, 25, says she has even taken a vow of chastity. "I'm not having sex for a year," she tells the magazine. “I've decided. I'll kiss, but nothing else."
Hopefully, someone has warned her on-again boyfriend Stavros Niarchos, who was spotted dirty dancing with the hotel heiress in Saint Tropez last week.
posted
""The reason so many of my relationships don't work is guys are like, 'Hey what's going on? It's been like four months and I'm only getting a kiss here,'" she explains. "I feel good about it. I like the way guys go crazy when they can't have sex with you. If he can't have you, he stays interested"
Don't those statements contradict each other? First she says that her relationships don't work because she doesn't let the guys have sex with her and then she says that it keeps them with her longer. Posts: 2054 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Okay...so if I have this straight, she only ever kisses, but she's taking a vow to not have sex for a year and only kiss.
So, she's one of those people for whom a vow she has taken today means that she's always been like that?
I'd like to sell tickets to a tour of her mind. It could be like a brief sort of warm-up for touring real minds, with, like, oh, what is it...thoughts?
Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |
When you dress, talk, and act like that, people are going to think you are a skanky ho. Get over yourself.
Posts: 1357 | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah, I bought the cream. Thank god I've got a good prescription drug plan.
The problem I have is that I feel soiled deep down in my soul and I don't read enough German to understand the directions on how to apply it to non-material existential aspects of myself.
I tried using Bablefish but I'm pretty sure the translation got garbled. Even if it didn't, I refuse to live in a world where the ineffable essense of what makes me me is reached by holding a retirement party for my neighbor's dog.
Posts: 10177 | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Walking venereal disease she may be, but girls everywhere seem to idolize the useless sack of antlers. If she's going to wield influence, I'm glad it might have the unintended side effect of making chastity popular -- one tires of watching twelve year old girls call themselves sluts.
Posts: 3293 | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Why in the world would you/how in the world could you hate someone you don't even know? Not only is it pretty silly, hating someone based on media reports of them, but goodness, what a waste of energy.
Posts: 7954 | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
Not that I hate her. But I figure people get worked up about all sorts of things that may not seem important, so this may as well be one of them. More important than Paris is how Mighty Cow articulates what he likes and dislikes in women/rich people/human beings by disliking her.
Posts: 26077 | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Also, regardless of her sex life or lack thereof, I'm not digging the whole dirty slut/walking venereal disease/skanky ho thing. I thought we were past calling women names based on their sexuality?
Posts: 7954 | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
You could hate her for her influence on young girls and for what she does. I agree about the waste of energy though, there are millions of girls like her and plenty that I know personally that are like her, but I don't hate them. People are the way they are. If you don't like them, just stay away from them and ignore them.
Posts: 2054 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by GaalDornick: You could hate her for her influence on young girls and for what she does. I agree about the waste of energy though, there are millions of girls like her and plenty that I know personally that are like her, but I don't hate them. People are the way they are. If you don't like them, just stay away from them and ignore them.
Does she have any influence over young girls?
Posts: 1158 | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by ElJay: Why in the world would you/how in the world could you hate someone you don't even know? Not only is it pretty silly, hating someone based on media reports of them, but goodness, what a waste of energy.
ElJay: I hesitate to say it but you may have just stumpled on the solution for the fossil fuel energy crisis!
People say George Bush went to Iraq to steal their oil, NO NO NO. He did it to ignite more hatred for the United States. Hatred that we can use for energy!
They are dumping billions of dollars worth of hate powered energy a day down there, why not use it?
edit: I'd be more than happy to have Paris Hilton also supply additional reserves of hate based energy. Shoot I would like her better if she worked AT a gas station, and held that job for a considerable period of time.
Posts: 14316 | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
What do you mean by sexuality? How she dresses/acts?
Because I think public perception of her is shaped by her sex tapes (plural), and tabloid exploits than by how she dresses.
Posts: 5462 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
LOL, oh I really do. I dont even know if thats right, that is was Rick Soloman, but there you go. I dont know whether im impressed or scared Ph!
Posts: 457 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by El JT de Spang: What do you mean by sexuality? How she dresses/acts?
Because I think public perception of her is shaped by her sex tapes (plural), and tabloid exploits than by how she dresses.
I was talking acts, actually, not dresses. There are all these negative words for women who enjoy sex, and very few for men. Male socialties who go around making out with celebraties (or even making sex tapes) don't get called skanks, hos, sluts, etc. Or walking venereal diseases.
I mean, someone was willing to bet $20 that pH couldn't name the man in the tape. Because no one cares if men have sex, and even make a tape of their conquests. But for the woman involved it's seen as shameful. Whatever.
I don't know and I don't care if Paris Hilton is telling the truth about how many people she's had sex with. But if you're labling women who have sex with multiple partners without the benefit of marriage, you're labeling me, too.
Posts: 7954 | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by katharina: More important than Paris is how Mighty Cow articulates what he likes and dislikes in women/rich people/human beings by disliking her.
I should probably be offended by this, but I'm too busy hating all women, rich people, and human beings to care.
Posts: 3950 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:I mean, someone was willing to bet $20 that pH couldn't name the man in the tape. Because no one cares if men have sex, and even make a tape of their conquests. But for the woman involved it's seen as shameful. Whatever.
Uh, I was joking to show how the people she kisses arent famous. Not that that matters per se, but I personally dont care if women have sex. Its not shameful in my book. Hey, the more the merrier I say, and if a few could include me, that would be great.
Although that actually might be shameful in and of itself...
Posts: 457 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Did you notice the part about skanky hos, sluts, etc. in my first paragraph? Because I wasn't taking offense at Humean's statement, I was using it as an illustration. And I believe I said the whole thing made me sad. No one brought offense into it until you, Cow.
Posts: 7954 | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:I mean, someone was willing to bet $20 that pH couldn't name the man in the tape. Because no one cares if men have sex, and even make a tape of their conquests. But for the woman involved it's seen as shameful. Whatever.
That's not because he's a man, it's because he's not famous.
Slut, skank, and ho are all, unfortunately, gender specific. There aren't any words for men who exhibit the same behavior, to my knowledge.
I describe promiscuous guys with some homemade slang, but I'm not sure it doesn't violate the TOS. I also use "male slut" to describe that behavior in men. I'm equal opportunity, so the old 'women are sluts while men are studs' inequality doesn't apply to me. You were speaking generally, though, and not just to me though, so I guess your argument is still plenty valid for a lot of people.
There's also an important distinction between between sexual and being a turbo-slut. I don't have any problem with independent, confident women. I have a problem with people whose only discernable talent is milking their sexuality for fame and fortune. If there was a man who was as guilty of that as Paris Hilton, I'd have just as little respect for him as I do for her.
Posts: 5462 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
"Oh, that sounds difficult. Maybe I'll hire someone not to have sex for me."
"And, if um, I get paid not to have sex, is that like being an anti-prostitute?"
"and I will focus all my on my research into the aerodynamic effects of LOX based exhausts on the stability of trans-atmospheric lift capabilities. Why yes, I am a Rocket Scientist."
"unless I'm really, really, really drunk. Care for a shot?"
"Oh, I'm sorry. Even I couldn't keep from laughing on that one. Can we try another take..."
"Unless, of course, its with that hunk Dan Raven."
Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
I wouldn't put Colin Farell in that category because he became famous because he's an actor. Not an especially talented one, at least at this point, but he does have some talent beyond making out with celebrities.
His extracurricular activities did enhance his reputation quite a bit, which is the main reason I can't stand him. But he's still two steps below Paris Hilton.
Posts: 5462 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by katharina: Colin Ferrel?
I'm trying to imagine Colin Ferrel making a vow of chastity for a year.
Colin Ferrell "milks his sexuality for fame and fortune"? Moreso than your average actor? And you believe that is his "only discernable talent?
I think you're being harsh. Colin Ferrell is about as sexy as they come, but he's a pretty good actor, too (IMO). He's done some less than stellar movies, but I don't think they were misses because of him. Tigerland was a great movie, and Farrell's performance in A Home at the End of the World was excellent as well.
Edit to add: If he ever does make a vow of chastity for a year, I'm praying he gets stranded in my town with no place to stay on the first anniversary of that vow. /slut
Posts: 6394 | Registered: Dec 1999
| IP: Logged |
quote:I mean, someone was willing to bet $20 that pH couldn't name the man in the tape. Because no one cares if men have sex, and even make a tape of their conquests. But for the woman involved it's seen as shameful. Whatever.
That's not because he's a man, it's because he's not famous.
Neither was she, really, until after the tape.
quote: You were speaking generally, though, and not just to me though,
Seeing as you hadn't, you know, actually made any pejorative comments in this thread, I wasn't speaking about you at all. I was answering your question, but certainly not saying that you were doing any of those things. As obviously a quick scan of the thread would show you weren't.
Posts: 7954 | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Come on, now. I saw her in either FHM or Stuff magazine at least 3 years before this tape surfaced. She was a good deal more well known than the guy, even if her fame was spurred a lot by the tape. Not even just the tape, but moreso her reaction to it.
quote:Seeing as you hadn't, you know, actually made any pejorative comments in this thread, I wasn't speaking about you at all.
I know, I just realized that my answer to your question didn't invalidate your larger point, which is the stigma on females who are sexually forward, so I thought I'd mention that I did realize that.
Posts: 5462 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm not saying she'd never been in a magazine, but I'd certainly never heard of her. I'd imagine some people knew who she was. But he was a musician, wasn't he? So there were probably people who knew who he was, too. And she's from an extremely wealthy family, so that might have something to do with why all the news stories were talking about her rather than him.
And really, the other thing you can say is that she did a much better job promoting herself from it than he did. They both had to sign a release in order for it to be distributed, and there is evidence that they actually went back and made a new, better quality tape for the distribution. (I read a really interesting article awhile back about the promotion of porn, and how people in the media spotlight frequently aren't trying to do what they want you to think they are. I'll see if I can find it.)
Posts: 7954 | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't think he was anything. Maybe that he called himself a producer, but I never heard of him being a musician. I'd google it, but, um, I don't wanna.
Posts: 5462 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[ROFL]](graemlins/rofl.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
