posted
"stand the test of time"? I was reading a thread on the other side about Empire and someone made the comment that the book couldn't stand the test of time because of all its modern day references. That made me think.
Do authors expect or want ALL their books to stand the test of time? Or do they write to tell the stories they have to tell? Or is it a little of both?
Posts: 1132 | Registered: A Long Time Ago!
| IP: Logged |
posted
LOL. Not being an author I think that most authors write to tell a story not expecting it to last or be popular or win awards. I think if you write with that purpose in mind your story may not be as good. Notice I say may. I can certainly see a great author having a purpose for his/her book and still having it be awesome.
I think that comment just irritated me because I love OSC's books. Sure there are some I read once and never again and there are others I read repeatedly. Then again I have a poor memory so I can get away with it - they often feel new again Posts: 1132 | Registered: A Long Time Ago!
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dear, there are millions of writers. Might it be that within this population of writer-beings, there is every conceivable subset of ambition?
Great stories, great writing, will last forever, however. In Pompeii, on a wall, there is the lovely line about "Rex loves Octavian," from the Roman days.
Posts: 3060 | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think authors write their books about the things they feel are important, and whether those same things will still be important a hundred years from now, who can say.
Posts: 930 | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
However, a political fiction book like 'Empire' might at least be useful as a potential source for historians in the future.
It could be useful for them to gauge some of the political discussions taking place in popular culture and a few people's concepts of where the future potentially could be headed.
As for the discussion - I think most people are reasonably aware that they probably aren't creating deathless prose. I don't suppose that Dickens and Shakespeare really thought that their works would still be being read by now - they just looked forward to their fans enjoying it, and the money.
For all we know, ’Bridget Jones’s Diary’ might one day be seen as the defining work of our times. It’s impossible to judge from where we're standing.
Posts: 1528 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think it is possible to judge -- at the very least -- that if there's a defining work of our times, it ain't 'Bridget Jones' Diary'.
Posts: 2267 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TL: I think it is possible to judge -- at the very least -- that if there's a defining work of our times, it ain't 'Bridget Jones' Diary'.
posted
Hey! That was a really funny book. Maybe kids would like English better if funny books became defining works of their time...instead of, say, The Scarlet Letter.
I, for one, dearly love a laugh.
Posts: 834 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bella Bee: For all we know, ’Bridget Jones’s Diary’ might one day be seen as the defining work of our times. It’s impossible to judge from where we're standing.
Please, Zeus, let this not happen.
Posts: 3932 | Registered: Sep 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
a woman perpetually frustrated in love and the lack thereof? sounds like the voice of my generation.
Posts: 3936 | Registered: Jul 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
You could have thrown a correction at that quote, since Spock says "Greats" rather than "Giants". Kirk's line could use some editing as well, but I don't think anyone is geeky enough to admit knowing it verbatim. I'm certainly not.
Empire will be remembered by history...though perhaps not as favorably as one could hope. Still, it's going to be remembered. I doubt that any of Briget Jones's Diary (aside from the title) will be able to claim that honor.
In any case, when I write my final report on humanity, Empire will rate a mention and BJD probably won't. On the other hand.... Hey, is there some definitive work of modern porn? No, forget I asked. BJD doesn't get a mention, neither does the definitive work of modern porn.
Posts: 763 | Registered: Aug 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Bridget Jones's Diary has been incredibly influential in the publishing world. Based on its success, we essentially have a new genre: the humorous 1st person modern romance. Now, this publishing trend has only lasted a decade so far...maybe readers will tire of these "desperate singles" books. In the meantime, though, I think it's worth noting when we're considering what's enduring and what's not. Posts: 834 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh gosh I tried to read that book once on a plane when I had finished my book too soon, and someone handed me that one in my connecting airport. It was so bad! I just abandoned it in my seatback pocket.
If that's the defining book for our times, heaven help us! <laughs>
Posts: 6246 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Survivor: You could have thrown a correction at that quote, since Spock says "Greats" rather than "Giants". Kirk's line could use some editing as well, but I don't think anyone is geeky enough to admit knowing it verbatim. I'm certainly not.
Well, "Giants" is the way I remembered it. I didn't dig up the DVD to check, and I'm definitely not geeky enough to commit dialogue that precisely to memory. Posts: 241 | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by hugh57: Well, "Giants" is the way I remembered it. I didn't dig up the DVD to check, and I'm definitely not geeky enough to commit dialogue that precisely to memory.
Neither am I. However, I am geeky enough to own the novelization, and to be able to find the quote. You were right about "giants," but wrong about Danielle Steele (I thought she sounded wrong). It's actually:
quote:Kirk: You mean profanity. That's simply the way they talk here. Nobody pays any attention to you unless you swear every other word. You'll even find it in all the literature of the period. Spock: For example? Kirk: Oh, the complete works of Jacqueline Susann, the novels of Harold Robbins . . . Spock: Ah, the giants.
posted
Hmm. Well, I guess I don't think that "giants" makes a lot of sense in that context. I could blame Nimoy's funny drawl, but probably shouldn't. Also, I didn't know that Jacqueling Susann and Harold Robbins had any significance. I have heard of Danielle Steele, though.
I'm not trying to prove anything, by the way. Not saying you guys are geekier than me. No no no. We just care about different things, is all.
Posts: 763 | Registered: Aug 1999
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
about Empire and someone made the comment that the book couldn't stand the test of time because of all its modern day references. That made me think.
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Cry]](graemlins/cry.gif)
