quote:Originally posted by MrSquicky: Samp, who seems to aspire to almost always being a jerk, but is giving Blayne problems for his posting history, not about this particular problem,
I guess if you think that my aspirations are 'be a jerk on hatrack' y'all prolly not had too many real jerks on hatrack.
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Blayne, an easy way to do it with your typical D&D dice is this: add the lowest number (1) to the highest number (4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 20) and divide by two.
So you get 2½, 3½, 4½, 5½, 6½, and 10½.
Posts: 158 | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
Blayne Bradley
unregistered
posted
the reiman sums is sorta in the integration/anti derivitive portion which my calculus class didn't need to do.
IP: Logged |
posted
But which you, personally, apparently did need. Your faith in the overlap between what your classes teach you and what you need to know would be touching if it weren't so obviously a defense mechanism to cover laziness. And, by the way, these are not Riemann sums.
[ June 07, 2009, 09:49 PM: Message edited by: King of Men ]
Posts: 10645 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |